It seems that unevidenced claims and logical fallacies are all that make up the attempted arguments against science here.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is the evolutionary doctrine a racist doctrine?
- Thread starter Eli G
- Start date
Now you seem like a clon of those I ignore already. I won't send you to the same hole. I need you to make readers realize how ridiculously evolutionists can behave.
Argentbear
Well-Known Member
That about sums it up
I think readers recognize what is going on and who is behaving well and who isn't. They also see who understands science and who doesn't. They see who is ridiculing others and who isn't.
Unlike some, I don't assume that people that just read these forums without participating are stupid.
Unlike some, I don't assume that people that just read these forums without participating are stupid.
Getting personal is absolutely not my thing ...
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Ignorance is the creationist armor. That is true for almost all creationists. They cannot afford to learn the basics and they seem to know that.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Are you serious?Getting personal is absolutely not my thing ...
It absolutely does seem to be, based on the evidence. Passive aggression doesn't make bad behavior turn into good behavior.Getting personal is absolutely not my thing ...
I've listed some of that evidence.
Again
And to prove it I won't continue on this useless dialog.Getting personal is absolutely not my thing ...
Have a wonderful night.
Other than ridicule, do you actually have any legitimate points or questions here?Getting personal is absolutely not my thing ...
That isn't evidence refuting what has already been noted. And no loss to me in any event.
I am having a wonderful night. Thank you so much for that.
I'll be waiting for an expert in that "science of evolution" (whatever that is) to tell me if I am wrong about what evolutionist believe on that.Are you sure I am "making stuff up"?
Evolutionists say that the first human-ape female was interbreeding non-human male apes and her descendants after her, until after several centuries of descendants, the first ape-human male (or one of his descendants) met one of her genetic descendants, so they formed the first truly human couple.
If I am wrong an expert evolutionist will surely "educate" me.
A YES or a NO may be enough. Thanks in advance.
If you don't know anything about the science how would you know if you are right or wrong about anything you say?I'll be waiting for an expert in that "science of evolution" (whatever that is) to tell me if I am wrong about what evolutionist believe on that.
A YES or a NO may be enough. Thanks in advance.
Maybe you should focus on proofreading your posts first before making further silly statements.
You have a wonderful, wonderful evening.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It does not take an "expert". Sadly you refuse to learn. You probably know that you cannot afford to.I'll be waiting for an expert in that "science of evolution" (whatever that is) to tell me if I am wrong about what evolutionist believe on that.
A YES or a NO may be enough. Thanks in advance.
Hehehe, I know A LOT OF THINGS about sciences ... not all of course, like neither do you.
I am not "teaching" anything. I am here debating the beliefs of the evolutionists.
Maybe I am able to debate things which no one had really proved or showed evidences.Maybe you should focus on proofreading your posts first before making further silly statements.
Thank you very much. I came first though.You have a wonderful, wonderful evening.
PD: If you wanna tell me something else, please do it on the topic and don't get personal. Thank you.
There was never a human being born to non-human parents.
Female. That's Marjorie Taylor Greene. She's had work done on the brow ridge and bleached and let her hair down, but the noses and muzzles are a dead giveaway:
I'm pretty sure, based on what I've seen, that I know more science than you do.
No. You have made up your mind that everyone that accepts science is wrong and you are using passive aggression to ridicule them and the science. It's is pretty clear from the evidence.
Where are you doing this? It hasn't been on this forum. Here, I haven't seen you debating.
That sounds like a personal issue with self control.
Your accusation is incorrect and in the wrong direction. I believe you should be looking in a mirror when you say that.PD: If you wanna tell me something else, please do it on the topic and don't get personal. Thank you.
I wish you would say on topic and actually debate here. That is listening to others and refuting what you don't agree with using evidence. No ridicule or silly claims. If anyone needs to stay on topic, I think most recognize who that is.
Don't you know the story of the mitochondrial Eve and the Y-chromosomal Adam in the evolutionist Bible?
It seems to be the same general case. It seems reasonable to me that a fear of knowledge that might upset a personal applecart is a big driver here.
That is not a story of a non-human ape giving birth to a human baby. Good grief!Don't you know the story of the mitochondrial Eve and the Y-chromosomal Adam in the evolutionist Bible?
Can't you come up with a real objection or legitimate challenge to the science?
Apparently, you don't know the story either.