• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is the moon getting nearer ?

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No , you are arrogant and like most science types hate the very fact that a nobody amateur can explain the Universe better than science and has created the god equation , not to mention flawed all your silly ideas about gravity , light and mass etc .

It is not I whom is clueless, is it now ?
But you can't. Did you forget the lesson about Joey Speaking French?

You parrot terms that you do not understand and put them together in a way that tells us that you have no clue. Just ask if was obvious to you that Joey could not speak French, we can see that you have no understanding of the sciences.

And yes. You are the clueless one here.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I might start a mini series on youtube , science comedy classics .

Did you know they use to think light traveled all on it's self :eek:

100's of years and they couldn't work out the simplicity of gravity o_O

Equations with words like mass, but they didn't know what mass was :(

A big bang , comedy gold :p

Time slows down :handok: Quality comedy

And apparently , just because I don't know some irrelevant maths , I've got problems :tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy:
I am sure that it would comedy gold. But not for the reasons that you think it would be.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
But you can't. Did you forget the lesson about Joey Speaking French?

You parrot terms that you do not understand and put them together in a way that tells us that you have no clue. Just ask if was obvious to you that Joey could not speak French, we can see that you have no understanding of the sciences.

And yes. You are the clueless one here.

I know what I am , that is a scientist ! One of the best this world as seen .

Are you denying light travels because it is high energy state being attracted to low energy state ?

No velocity by it's own mechanism .
 

gnostic

The Lost One
10 + 15 = 25 so why are creating/use stupid malarkey maths ?

It makes no sense .
It is not malarkey.

You should have known what SZ was doing, because it was from high school maths in Year 9.

You were wrong, and your -5 answer was wrong, but you won’t admit it.

SZ didn’t give you 10 + 15, he gave you 10 - (-15). You should be working on his question.

You really need to go back to school and retake Maths.

Did you enter SZ’s question into the calculator, as I’ve asked you to, in the order they were written, with the brackets?

Input 10 - (-15), and then find the answer. Your -5 is incorrect.

If you think everyone is lying to you, then input those numbers as given.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
It is not malarkey.

You should have known what SZ was doing, because it was from high school maths in Year 9.

You were wrong, and your -5 answer was wrong, but you won’t admit it.

SZ didn’t give you 10 + 15, he gave you 10 - (-15). You should be working on his question.

You really need to go back to school and retake Maths.

Did you enter SZ’s question into the calculator, as I’ve asked you to, in the order they were written, with the brackets?

Input 10 - (-15), and then find the answer. Your -5 is incorrect.

If you think everyone is lying to you, then input those numbers as given.
my calculator says 25 . . . Hmm, something must be wrong with it:D
 

gnostic

The Lost One
I know what I am , that is a scientist ! One of the best this world as seen .
You? A scientist?

If you were a scientist, you could have solve SZ’s basic math problem without a calculator.

But it would seem that you cannot even use calculator, because you are still arguing and you are still ignorant of not only basic maths, but you do not realise how incompetent you are with science.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
What rubbish, if the moon increased its momentum it would fly off in a straight line . Real escape velocity .
As the Moon has an orbital momentum, it of course would escape the Earth in a radial motion and not in a straight line.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
No , you are arrogant and like most science types hate the very fact that a nobody amateur can explain the Universe better than science and has created the god equation , not to mention flawed all your silly ideas about gravity , light and mass etc .
I generally agree in this. One can point out several flaws, contradictions and metaphysical "matters" in "the Standard Cosmology" but the standard normalists still lean on the their standard cosmology dogmatism - and as their individual critics and alternative thinking is set out of the order, they´ll never learn to solve the standing cosmological problems.
 

Etritonakin

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't it be awesome if you could do something about it?

Position, knowledge, interface...

18For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. 19For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. 20For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, 21Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

21Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.

Think locally. Act universally!
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
So: WHAT is "Light". Tell us!

Light is electromagnetic radiation. It comes in endless frequencies, so it is clearly not "high energy" since even the coldest objects will emit very very low level radiation. It comes in little packets called "photons". Each photon has a specific frequency. Of course that frequency can be changed if one is moving towards or away from the source.

That is already probably more than you know about light.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
As the Moon has an orbital momentum, it of course would escape the Earth in a radial motion and not in a straight line.
Let's go over this a little bit more just for fun.

Say that the force of gravity suddenly disappeared between the Earth and the Moon. The Moon would go off, but not on a radius, but on a tangent. You forgot the conservation of momentum. It would go in a straight line, starting as a tangent to its orbit at the time that gravity "stopped". You mentioned "orbital momentum", the correct term that you wanted to use is "angular momentum". That would have to be conserved too. But angular momentum is the cross product of the momentum and the radius. The object would not move in a circle since its radius would keep growing larger and larger. The angle between the radius and the momentum would keep getting smaller but since the radius is growing that would make up for it. The angular momentum would be conserved. The magnitude of the angular momentum would be m*v*r*sin(angle between r and v).
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Light is electromagnetic radiation. It comes in endless frequencies, so it is clearly not "high energy" since even the coldest objects will emit very very low level radiation. It comes in little packets called "photons". Each photon has a specific frequency. Of course that frequency can be changed if one is moving towards or away from the source.
That is already probably more than you know about light.
"It comes in little packets called "photons"? I assume you mean "particle photons" here? If so, your electromagnetic explanation is pure nonsens.
 
Top