Is the moon getting nearer ?

[james blunt]

10 + 15 = 25 = 10 - (-15)

-(-15) = 15

That's stupid , ridiculous even , 10 + 15 = 25 is correct , the other is made up malarkey . Numberang lmao .

 

[james blunt]

I wouldn´t say that. It´s rather logics and natural sense.

Logic that over rules the fake science .

 

[james blunt]

"N-field" would be the Nuttah field, I take it, named after the eminent, strait-jacketed physicist Dr. Antoine Bärking-Nuttah.

Regarding the interpretation of this, I see you say that what this means to me is proportionate to the inverse - of its meaning, presumably, i.e. what it does not mean. It seems to me this is a condition that can only be satisfied when the meaning is exactly zero, since the inverse of zero is also zero. That makes sense, at any rate.

The bit about increasing density make sense, too.

Yes we are all going to go insane ......

 

[ratiocinator]

That's stupid , ridiculous even , 10 + 15 = 25 is correct , the other is made up malarkey .

This is basic arithmetic they teach at key stage 3 (11 to14 year olds): Positive and negative numbers

 

[ratiocinator]

Logic that over rules the fake science .

It isn't fake - it works. Evidence (correct predictions) is what is important in science.

The universe doesn't care about what you or I understand, what we find intuitive, or what we want it to be like. Scientific theories stand or fall by how well their predictions match reality.

 

[james blunt]

This is basic arithmetic they teach at key stage 3 (11 to14 year olds): Positive and negative numbers

No, it is numberang to try make science seem smart .

10 - 5 = 5 is proper maths , 0 - 5 = -5 is proper maths, what you presented is useless garbage .

Tell , give me one realism example of your equation ?

 

[james blunt]

It isn't fake - it works. Evidence (correct predictions) is what is important in science.

The universe doesn't care about what you or I understand, what we find intuitive, or what we want it to be like. Scientific theories stand or fall by how well their predictions match reality.

Well science doesn't want me , don't worry , have you seen me attack politics yet ?

Oh boy , the poor world is going to get it off me !

 

[james blunt]

The son came to the earth and the quickening arrived !

 

[Subduction Zone]

There is no need to tell you, is there? You´ll still hold on to the strange mathematical quantum idea that light is particles - even if you schizophrenic started with explaining light as an electromagnetic radiation.

So you can't support your claim at all. And you have the nerve to call me and reality "schizophrenic" .

Once again, either support your claim or admit that you are wrong and I will explain why we know that I am right and why you are wrong.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You and your pathetic and patronizing "you don´t know this or that".
Everything from the smallest atom to galactic motions of course have angular momentum, you just fail to combine the smallest parts with the bigger part. Of course you´re excused in this because everything in your mind starts off with a Big Bang and the strange linear time scale - where the angular momentum cannot be dynamically explained at all. So you just hold your horses with your artificial besserwissen attitudes.

I don´t give a daim for your mathematical calculations when it comes to anything else but calculating "how much a wooden board expands in sunshine -)

Modern cosmology start to went completely wrong in the Einsteinian mathematical period.

Enjoy this video

Oh my Gawd! I am not being patronizing. I am being excessively polite. I have not called you names. I have not pointed out that you do not have even a high school level of science education.

You do not have a clue as to what angular momentum is. I gave you the definition. I could do so with links. Real links to valid sources. You cannot do the same. You linked a video by an idiot. Try to find something that passed peer review. Idiots are a dime a dozen on YouTube.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I wouldn´t say that. It´s rather logics and natural sense.

But you were using ignorance and nonsense.

Try again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That's stupid , ridiculous even , 10 + 15 = 25 is correct , the other is made up malarkey . Numberang lmao .

I see that the number line is still beyond your comprehension.

 

[james blunt]

I see that the number line is still beyond your comprehension.

I see you can't give a realism example of use .

 

[ratiocinator]

Tell , give me one realism example of your equation ?

Let's say you have a bank account and you consider deposits to be positive and withdrawals to negative. Say your in the unfortunate position of withdrawing £1 more than you deposit each day, so the change in balance per day is -1.

If you have £100 today, then in (say) 5 days, you'll have
100 + (-1 x 5) = 95.

How about 5 days ago? If the future is positive, then the past must be negative, so five days ago, you had
100 + (-5 x -1) = 100 + 5 = 105.

 

[james blunt]

It isn't fake - it works. Evidence (correct predictions) is what is important in science.

The universe doesn't care about what you or I understand, what we find intuitive, or what we want it to be like. Scientific theories stand or fall by how well their predictions match reality.

Lights fallen , tell me it hasn't and lie ?

Wheres my recognition ?

I won't get any because my face doesn't fit , science will claim its them who thought of this .

 

[Subduction Zone]

I see you can't give a realism example of use .

Wrong again. A debt is a real life example of a negative number in action.

These are concepts you should have learned in elementary school, or the British equivalent of that. Put it another way, you should have learned this by the age of twelve years old.

 

[james blunt]

Let's say you have a bank account and you consider deposits to be positive and withdrawals to negative. Say your in the unfortunate position of withdrawing £1 more than you deposit each day, so the change in balance per day is -1.

If you have £100 today, then in (say) 5 days, you'll have
100 + (-1 x 5) = 95.

How about 5 days ago? If the future is positive, then the past must be negative, so five days ago, you had
100 + (-5 x -1) = 100 + 5 = 105.

That sounds really scientific , honestly ! NOT

Basic maths does that without trying to add another set of maths that does the same thing !

 

[Subduction Zone]

Let's say you have a bank account and you consider deposits to be positive and withdrawals to negative. Say your in the unfortunate position of withdrawing £1 more than you deposit each day, so the change in balance per day is -1.

If you have £100 today, then in (say) 5 days, you'll have
100 + (-1 x 5) = 95.

How about 5 days ago? If the future is positive, then the past must be negative, so five days ago, you had
100 + (-5 x -1) = 100 + 5 = 105.

LOL! I made a quick reply before seeing your more well explained example.

 

[james blunt]

Wrong again. A debt is a real life example of a negative number in action.

These are concepts you should have learned in elementary school, or the British equivalent of that. Put it another way, you should have learned this by the age of twelve years old.

You're talking rubbish that does not relate to Quantum science . Trying to undermine with garbage so the readers thing I have no smarts.
You science people are not clever , end of period . I have it correct and lots of science is wrong .

 

[Native]

rrathe

What are "logics" and what are "dingenotes"?

Anyway - the point is that mathematical physics is mathematical physics, we are applying the same techniques to cosmology as everything else. To go back to your previous mistake, the reason the moon would escape the earth tangentially, and in a straight line, is the same reason people throw the discus the way they do: Tangents and Circles

In the video modern cosmological and mathematical principles and it´s logics - rather the lack of it - are discussed and the author reveals the inconsistencies of the "theoretical gibberish" based on pure speculations.
"Dingenotes" is in generally what you are referring to when you avoid to get into the critiques in the video. You also could call this for willfully denial and explaining away