Pragmatist
Member
I think "839311" has posed some excellent questions, which should be seriously considered by all Judicially based monotheists, as well as all students of that subject.
I first became aware of this problem in reading Max Weber. Should the godly separate themselves from the ungodly? The Amish seem to have solved the problem: somehow they manage to adhere to their "lifestyle," without separating themselves from the community. They don't run away from the outside world. This kind of flight from others is one of the defining features of what I would call a "cult."
Perhaps. There are so many variations of "Abrahamic" religion. To make things simple, we talk about the big three, but each of these subdivides into an infinitude, and the borders between them are not always secure. I am tempted to assert, Yes, rejection is a universally defining element, But, there may be other elements, less easy to define, which offset this tendency.
No. Rejection plays a central role here as well. Unclean foods are to be rejected (and everyone who eats them). Idols are to be rejected (and everyone who sacrifices to them). Blood is to be rejected (especially human menstrual blood). True, I have described a fundamentalism, but every religion has fundamentalist tendencies.
Is the rejection of others a cornerstone of Abrahamic religions?
I first became aware of this problem in reading Max Weber. Should the godly separate themselves from the ungodly? The Amish seem to have solved the problem: somehow they manage to adhere to their "lifestyle," without separating themselves from the community. They don't run away from the outside world. This kind of flight from others is one of the defining features of what I would call a "cult."
Is it fair to say that rejection is one of the defining characteristics of the Abrahamic God, as well as most of the adherents of Abrahamic religions?
Perhaps. There are so many variations of "Abrahamic" religion. To make things simple, we talk about the big three, but each of these subdivides into an infinitude, and the borders between them are not always secure. I am tempted to assert, Yes, rejection is a universally defining element, But, there may be other elements, less easy to define, which offset this tendency.
Is Judaism the exception, where rejection does not play a central role?
No. Rejection plays a central role here as well. Unclean foods are to be rejected (and everyone who eats them). Idols are to be rejected (and everyone who sacrifices to them). Blood is to be rejected (especially human menstrual blood). True, I have described a fundamentalism, but every religion has fundamentalist tendencies.