At this point? Possibly
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is YE Creationist Kent Hovind right?
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
At this point? Possibly
Astrophile
Active Member
It might depend on other circumstances. If the brilliant scientist was in their 60s and the other person was in their 20s, or if the scientist was unmarried and childless while the other person had dependent children, it might be better to save the other person. What if the other person was a famous writer or musician or painter?
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
All talk about who will be saved, and 3 world war priorities, and terrorism was not part of this thread. It came to be, because they have said, that my CV has zero importance in RF. It is Nihilism.
rational experiences
Veteran Member
If a scientist theist designer human built civilization as men brothers by minds the conscious agree. Then they claimed I own everything.
O earth owned all products as a term God.
Garden nature the food.
Each self only owned their self.
A human.
That human mind says I am so conniving yet I know I am in danger of life lost as my own on earth.
I must warn myself but how?
First I must tell myself look only at the living biology. You are only one body better in life than an ape living life.
Convince yourself that you did not invent creation. You must.
So then he tells by his control of using fear as his known tactic. Rich men he says wants all population human except their self to die out.
Seeing the scientist was first only a small group agreed choice as a community. About summarises men in power by group status worldwide today.
Everyone stops to think why? What have I done wrong.
Natural history....all wrongs the rich man's game against humanity.
Who claim man was now the God by taking all earth products and nature and controlling it by human fear induced false status.
To be rich and in control.
Yet he doesn't control space.
He doesn't control the sun.
The stars.
The moon.
The heavens or the planet.
So humanity by consensus self included said God the earth will sure show you who is boss. Because it always did.
Self destroyer end of life reasons about humans for humans.
O earth owned all products as a term God.
Garden nature the food.
Each self only owned their self.
A human.
That human mind says I am so conniving yet I know I am in danger of life lost as my own on earth.
I must warn myself but how?
First I must tell myself look only at the living biology. You are only one body better in life than an ape living life.
Convince yourself that you did not invent creation. You must.
So then he tells by his control of using fear as his known tactic. Rich men he says wants all population human except their self to die out.
Seeing the scientist was first only a small group agreed choice as a community. About summarises men in power by group status worldwide today.
Everyone stops to think why? What have I done wrong.
Natural history....all wrongs the rich man's game against humanity.
Who claim man was now the God by taking all earth products and nature and controlling it by human fear induced false status.
To be rich and in control.
Yet he doesn't control space.
He doesn't control the sun.
The stars.
The moon.
The heavens or the planet.
So humanity by consensus self included said God the earth will sure show you who is boss. Because it always did.
Self destroyer end of life reasons about humans for humans.
Daniel Nicholson
Blasphemous Pryme
Evolution isn't even a theory anymore. It's a straight up fact, proven over and over again in so many ways. So no, Hovind is not right on this topic. Even people in his camp don't agree with him.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Reject Kent Hovins plan of God you mean....
Creation is by God's plan not plan and not Kovid's. Science is the best witness we have of God's plan
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
I get what you mean
the coment you qouted me on was meant as a joke But I dont trust science....
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
You don't trust science, but you trust some charlatan who mispresents science? Why?I get what you mean
But I dont trust science....
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
As a spiritual person its more easy to trust spiritual people who gone the path before. And of course the faith in God.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
So you openly acknowledge that you are trusting in a charlatan? Just because he calls himself a "spiritual person?"
Is it a "spiritual" thing to rip off your followers and employees via tax fraud?
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
Umm i do not believe in Kent Hovin if you thought that.
I Speak about my spiritual belief in sufi teaching.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
He never accepted the accusations.
Are you suggesting your spirituality is why you don't trust science?
What about science don't you trust?
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Stupid Science has proven, that humans are not humans, but animals. Bears and wolfs do not built churches, movies, schools, statues, etc.
Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
The science that seeking God, they will not be able to find God by science.
Spiritual practice is all about realising God, and how to purify ones own being, science is to develop tools to make life more easu (comfortable)
This sounds like stupid education. You don't know science.
Humans are primates, and mammals, which are categories in animal classification. Like it or not but we humans evolved with other life forms on this planet, from more primitive types.
Bears and wolves don't build churches but they have complex social interactions like humans.
Why do you keep talking in code? This makes no sense.
I disagree. I think the more a believer seeks to justify their belief they will fall deeper into despair. There is no coherent meaning to the word god, so believers remain confused and uncertain. They blame themselves and try to work harder to understand, but there is nothing to find, thus more blame on the failures of the spiritual self. Religion offers a trap, and it becomes a prison. The believer is his own guard.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
so, you agree?
Not with the rest, which you got wrong.
Is being wrong about science what a "quest for truth" is all about?