• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Isis delighted with Trump's ban

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
I recall many claims of Iranian involvement in terrorism under the Obama administration.
But as I said, I can't explain the inclusions & exclusions.
I have no info on the new admin's reasoning.

No reasoning involved Just Gut reaction against those that he had no business connections to.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Grief, you're as bad as Trump and his cronies. Read the exchange between us. It was you who commented about Isis and the media!!

I mean't our media. Besides, nobody likes ISIS, so if ISIS says Trump is bad the people over there will love Trump. And since we all know American media is totally corrupt and biased, when they repeat Trump hate propaganda we know we can trust Trump all the more, or "The Donald" if you prefer.
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Lets see now, the media has said.
Let's vet each claim...
Putin loves Trump,
This is true. From Interfax (Russia's news source) И после конференции Путин сказал, что Дональд Трамп - очень яркий и талантливый человек и абсолютный лидер президентской гонки. Translation: After the conference Putin said: Donald Trump is a very smart and talented man and is the absolute leader in the Presidential race. That's a quote... from the original Russian.
the KKK loves Trump,
So many quotes I could use. How about I just provide a GIF of the KKK's Newspaper: The Guardian
kkkhead.jpg
ISIS loves Trump.
They do and they've joined the other bigots who supported Komrade Trumpsky. From a son of one of their leaders:
Zak Ebrahim said:
"To hear a presidential candidate say we need to kill innocent people — that is pure propaganda for groups like ISIS. They love men like Donald Trump. He certainly isn't working for them, but he is making their jobs much much easier. They point to these sorts of comments and frankly the policies that come out of these sorts of comments."
But what they never say is America loves Trump,
Most of us don't: Only 42% approval rating as of this weekend per http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/gallup-trump-approval-rating-falls-week-one
even though the election would prove they do, moreso than Hillary.
Dude, Clinton won 48.2% percent of the vote compared to Komrade Trumpsky's 46.1%. That's almost 3,000,000 votes!

So, the media's been spot on here. Good job in not debunking the media.


I mean't our media.

Yeah, we got that and the results are the same. We can rely on our media for the truth. We can rely on Komrade Trumpsky for xenophobia, racism and other bigotries. You didn't have to be a bigot to have voted for Komrade Trumpsky: but it certainly helped.
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
Is it possible that they happen to be the most likely to be at risk for having terrorists coming here?

Yes but I suspect that's the narrative designed to distract from the real logic behind Trump's decision.


There is indeed a problem with a violent radical segment of Islam, & this would mean that
some majority Muslim countries would pose a greater risk than countries like Tibet, Norway,
Peru, Switzerland, Lesotho, or Canuckistan. Note also the admin's claim that Saudi Arabia,
Indonesia, & many other Muslim countries are not included in the ban.

I don't disagree but if this were truly about stopping radical Muslims from coming to the States as opposed to playing to a crowd then why has he not suspended all travel to America by Saudi Arabia - a country whom the American intelligence community knows had a hand in the 9/11 attacks; Afghanistan which is seeing an increase in Taliban activity; or Pakistan which is the Muslim version of Israel (not that you'll ever hear them complaining about it)?


Btw, if you want to know how the risk levels are determined, I haven't a clue.

None of us do. All we can do is infer Trump's motives from what he has done and has not done.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Anyone ever hear of reverse physiology?
One must look at all possibilities before making a conclusion using only one assumption.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Let's vet each claim...
This is true. From Interfax (Russia's news source) И после конференции Путин сказал, что Дональд Трамп - очень яркий и талантливый человек и абсолютный лидер президентской гонки. Translation: After the conference Putin said: Donald Trump is a very smart and talented man and is the absolute leader in the Presidential race. That's a quote... from the original Russian.
So many quotes I could use. How about I just provide a GIF of the KKK's Newspaper: The Guardian
kkkhead.jpg
They do and they've joined the other bigots who supported Komrade Trumpsky. From a son of one of their leaders:

Most of us don't: Only 42% approval rating as of this weekend per Gallup: Trump Net Approval Rating Drops 8 Points In First Week In Office
Dude, Clinton won 48.2% percent of the vote compared to Komrade Trumpsky's 46.1%. That's almost 3,000,000 votes!

So, the media's been spot on here. Good job in not debunking the media.




Yeah, we got that and the results are the same. We can rely on our media for the truth. We can rely on Komrade Trumpsky for xenophobia, racism and other bigotries. You didn't have to be a bigot to have voted for Komrade Trumpsky: but it certainly helped.
Works the same as KKK support, everybody hates the KKK so when the Dems need a little boost the KKK comes out in support of their enemies. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure it out. Masked people the same as ISIS, Al Queda etc. Take off the masks and you'd probably find Hillary or the Pope.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Is it possible that they happen to be the most likely to be at risk for having terrorists coming here?
There is indeed a problem with a violent radical segment of Islam, & this would mean that
some majority Muslim countries would pose a greater risk than countries like Tibet, Norway,
Peru, Switzerland, Lesotho, or Canuckistan. Note also the admin's claim that Saudi Arabia,
Indonesia, & many other Muslim countries are not included in the ban.

Btw, if you want to know how the risk levels are determined, I haven't a clue.
Well the anti Muslim terrorism is already begun, makes them no better than any other terror extremist just cause they are targeting muslims makes no difference.
Quebec mosque attack: Canada is not immune from anti-Muslim backlash
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Anyone ever hear of reverse physiology?
One must look at all possibilities before making a conclusion using only one assumption.
What are you trying to say? That ISIS can't possibly find any sympathizers? That muslims will more than happy to just stay away and or be deported?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well the anti Muslim terrorism is already begun, makes them no better than any other terror extremist just cause they are targeting muslims makes no difference.
Quebec mosque attack: Canada is not immune from anti-Muslim backlash
Do you know that this is an anti-Muslim attack by non-Muslims?
It's awfully early to be certain of such a thing, particularly because
There's fake news about it, eg, The Daily Beast (who have since
retracted their earlier blaming of white supremacists.)
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Anyone ever hear of reverse physiology?
One must look at all possibilities before making a conclusion using only one assumption.

, No I've never heard of reverse physiology and I don't think anyone here has either, what is it, homeopathic medicine???
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
We have to realize that what Trump has been doing with his ban is feeding ISIS and other hate groups, upsetting our Muslim allies, and this is going to make us far less safe. Words have consequences, but discriminatory actions are even worse.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I don't disagree but if this were truly about stopping radical Muslims from coming to the States as opposed to playing to a crowd then why has he not suspended all travel to America by Saudi Arabia - a country whom the American intelligence community knows had a hand in the 9/11 attacks; Afghanistan which is seeing an increase in Taliban activity; or Pakistan which is the Muslim version of Israel (not that you'll ever hear them complaining about it)?
I wonder why the Obama admin also excluded Saudi Arabia from special attention for terrorism risks.
I question Trump's decision, but also Obama's.
This appears to be a bi-partisan selection.
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
There was a suggested correlation in the news. I posted about it here Judge halts implementation of Trump's immigration order

If true it seems unlikely to be chance but there could be some third confounding variable like existing laws passed by the Obama administration that directed his business. I do consider it possible Trump is acting on previous actions of Obama.

I'll see if I can find more later but right now I am posting from my phone. It does however seem to be a very poorly planned order.
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Anyone ever hear of reverse physiology?
Nope. Can't say that I have! Perhaps, and since you're a Republican I can't be certain, but perhaps you meant "reverse psychology"??? I'm not trying to put words in your mouth or anything, but I bet that's what you were going for.
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
I wonder why the Obama admin also excluded Saudi Arabia from special attention for terrorism risks.
I question Trump's decision, but also Obama's.
This appears to be a bi-partisan selection.

In Obama's case it was probably to avoid offending an ally. Trump's behaviour indicates that's significantly less of a concern since Iraq & Mexico are U.S. allies and Trump hasn't batted an eye about pissing them off. And what about Egypt? The government hasn't exactly been pally-pally with the White House of late. I suspect his decision on who to include and exclude on this travel ban is influenced more by his own business interests than not.
 
Top