Islam will dominate!

[tumbleweed41]

I merely pointed out your dishonesty.

Pity that you seem to revel in it.

 

[xkatz]

Indeed. They are smoking crack pot, no prayers, no muslim looks, no preacher next to them. As secular as their gone astray australian youth and brotherns.

Do I hear "No true Scotmans" fallacy?

 

[Kilgore Trout]

I dont think so watch that youtube video and it will show secular crack pot smoking villans with guns turned again into rightouse muslim atrocity.

I am daily finding it really hard here you value turth and honesty. :no:

Are you finding it really hard to spell simple words correctly?

 

[tumbleweed41]

Also the main issue stated was the Imams response, not whether the boys were, in your opinion, 'real' Muslims.

 

[301ouncer]

I merely pointed out your dishonesty.

Pity that you seem to revel in it.

I also merely pointed out that gang's preacher is a congucted falsehood.

I also merely pointed out the dishonesty of your comrads in editing and deleting accusations and slander.

I also merely pointed out attributing pot somking crack heads are mostly likely Creator denying secularists and not rightouse muslims.

Pity that you and your comrads revel in it from time to time.

 

[301ouncer]

Also the main issue stated was the Imams response, not whether the boys were, in your opinion, 'real' Muslims.

No. My initial response and initial search was whether the imam was the gang's preacher.

Do secularisim and athisim promote slander?

Those christian and muslim named labanies boys are the fruits of secularisim and not ours. So please keep them. They belong to that system.

 

[The_Evelyonian]

I also merely pointed out that gang's preacher is a congucted falsehood.

Yes, you falsely accused gnostic of using the term "gang preacher". You have still yet to apologize

I also merely pointed out attributing pot somking crack heads are mostly likely Creator denying secularists and not rightouse muslims.

No true scotsman in all its glory

 

[The_Evelyonian]

No. My initial response and initial search was whether the imam was the gang's preacher.

An interesting thing to search for as no one ever claimed that the imam was the gang's preacher.

 

[301ouncer]

Yes, you falsely accused gnostic of using the term "gang preacher". You have still yet to apologize



No true scotsman in all its glory

Never.

 

[301ouncer]

An interesting thing to search for as no one ever claimed that the imam was the gang's preacher.

It was claimed by your dishonest comrad.

Just as this claim of this dishonest iraq dossier:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7939726.stm

Does secularisim promote dishonesty and lies?

Out.

 

[The_Evelyonian]

It was claimed by your dishonest comrad.

So you say, yet can provide no evidence.

I'm really not surprised as you've yet to provide any evidence for the majority of your claims.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

Never.

Indeed - never apologizing when wrong, is a sure sign of someone who is dishonest and/or willfully ignorant. However, don't worry - it's not really a secret in your case anyway.

 

[The_Evelyonian]

I once hypothesized that our dear friend 301 was a Poe. Someone who is trying to skew people's perception of Muslims (how they act, how they think) in order to generally "give Muslims a bad name". I also said that, based on his behavior, he was either a Poe or someone who was deluded to the point of insanity. In order to give 301 the benefit of the doubt, I went with Poe. I'm beginning to think I was wrong and that option B may be closer to the truth.

 

[Wotan]

You have been caught in a lie 301, you failure to recognize that is a poor reflection on your faith.

Poor perhaps. Accurate for sure as to "your faith."

 

[Wotan]

I once hypothesized that our dear friend 301 was a Poe. Someone who is trying to skew people's perception of Muslims (how they act, how they think) in order to generally "give Muslims a bad name". I also said that, based on his behavior, he was either a Poe or someone who was deluded to the point of insanity. In order to give 301 the benefit of the doubt, I went with Poe. I'm beginning to think I was wrong and that option B may be closer to the truth.

I submit Sir, that NEITHER is correct.

We have here a fundamentalist religious fanatic. They are millions like him claiming both Islam and Christianity as their "faith." They are in mindset exactly as here presented. And they are dangerous in the extreme.

There is nothing so frightening as a man who thinks he is absolutely Right.:cover:

 

[The_Evelyonian]

I submit Sir, that NEITHER is correct.

We have here a fundamentalist religious fanatic. They are millions like him claiming both Islam and Christianity as their "faith." They are in mindset exactly as here presented. And they are dangerous in the extreme.

There is nothing so frightening as a man who thinks he is absolutely Right.:cover:

Perhaps so...

 

[Badran]

Do a google, type in "2000 gang rape Muslim Lebanese Sydney". It is probably in wikipedia too. The trial is public record.

You could also do search on the gang leader's name, Bilal Skaf, and on the imam's name Taj El-Din Hamid Hilaly.

Do you think I am lying?

301, if this is the post you are referring to, gnostic said "do search on the gang leader's name, Bilal Skaf, and on the imam's name....".

So, he didn't say gang preacher, or suggested anything like that, i think you just misunderstood. His point was of what the imam said as a justification for the rapists.

The point of this wasn't to show a crime done by muslims, it was done 10 years ago, he could have found something newer if he wanted to do that. The point was the lame things that imam said to justify the crime, by blaming it on the woman.

 

[301ouncer]

some Lebanese Muslim youths gang-raped a girl

This is yet another proof of resorting to use such dishonest tactics to save a face.

Including Muslim = Lie and dishonesty. It should have been said "some lebanese Secular youths".

[youtube]7wl_PD2guw4[/youtube]
YouTube - Lebanese Gang Video News Report Sydney

This is really an insult to islam but very much so of the compelet picture of secular australian youth, rap, bad language, gang, hollywood, crack pot somke, girls in mini skirts and fast cars.

I am really not buying it. Christanity and islam has nothing to do with vile and sick system.

All pointers to australia social fabric. reasonable and understandable.

 

[Badran]

This is yet another proof of resorting to use such dishonest tactics to save a face.

Including Muslim = Lie and dishonesty. It should have been said "some lebanese Secular youths".

This is really an insult to islam but very much so of the compelet picture of secular australian youth, rap, bad language, gang, hollywood, crack pot somke, girls in mini skirts and fast cars.

I am really not buying it. Christanity and islam has nothing to do with vile and sick system.

All pointers to australia social fabric. reasonable and understandable.

Well, i agree that there behavior is not Islamic at all. But if they are muslims, i mean if they adhere Islam, then gnostic wasn't lying. Like i told you he is also not trying to blame Islam for their behavior, this story's aim was about what the imam said, as a justification.

I don't see why their behavior points to Australia's social fabric. All this things you said about pot and gangs are all over the world, not just Australia.

 

[Wotan]

301, if this is the post you are referring to, gnostic said "do search on the gang leader's name, Bilal Skaf, and on the imam's name....".

So, he didn't say gang preacher, or suggested anything like that, i think you just misunderstood. His point was of what the imam said as a justification for the rapists.

The point of this wasn't to show a crime done by muslims, it was done 10 years ago, he could have found something newer if he wanted to do that. The point was the lame things that imam said to justify the crime, by blaming it on the woman.

You are to-o-o kind.:sad4: