Who said that all mammals must be related? That is an assumption, not a probable fact. Many different creatures are mammals....Australia has several that are difficult for scientists to figure out....especially the monotremes.
Adaptation does not create new “kinds”....it creates new varieties within a “kind”.....real evidence has proven that.
The phantom “common ancestors” have never been identified......and there must be millions of them.....so, where are they? It is asserted that they “must have” existed, but we never see them named. Science
assumes that some creatures are part of an evolutionary process, but they cannot prove that a “chain” of evolution has ever existed.......and they happily tell us that there is no “proof” for any of their assumptions......sounds like a snow job to me....smoke and mirrors....the power of suggestion.
The “rate of change” is also an
assumption. Adaptation has never been seen to go outside of a single species. Suggesting that change can lead to new creatures is not provable......it is a hypothesis, not a fact......defined as.....”a
supposition or
proposed explanation made
on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation”.....but you’d never know this judging by the zealous defence of different aspects of this theory, as if it’s not contestable. It is clearly contestable. Empty protests really change nothing.
Suggestions and assertions are not facts and never will be.
Indeed....gotta love nature......and that motivates gratitude for its Creator for me.
Who do you thank? “Mother Nature”?
Wrong parent IMO.
