• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel: Ethnic Cleansing or Genocide.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The U.S. has spent over $15,000,000,000 in the Syrian civil war and bombed and killed thousands. It maintains military bases in Syria which have been attacked killing American service members. The U.S. has no bases in Israel. If U.S. involvement is your primary criteria for concern of conflicts you should be more concerned with the U.S. involvement in Syrian than what is happening in Gaza.
More whataboutism, eh.
I'll choose my concerns.
This is just as you choose to be unconcerned
with Israel's attacks on of Palestinians....for
which US taxpayers have paid much more
than $15B.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Nice dance.
How exactly is it a "dance" for me to acknowledge the obvious fact that I am not responsible for Israeli military strategy?

Also, editing my response to remove the subsequent explanation is flagrantly dishonest. Here's the bit you deliberately missed in order to misrepresent me:

"that's the job of the IDF. I would hazard a guess, however, that cutting off aid, food, water and killing tens of thousands of civilians - including Israeli hostages - isn't strictly "necessary"."

I thought you were above this. Apparently, you're not. Please spend less time jerking your knees at people expressing an opinion no less controversial than "Israel shouldn't do war crimes" - a sentiment YOU AGREE WITH.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
How exactly is it a "dance" for me to acknowledge the obvious fact that I am not responsible for Israeli military strategy?

Also, editing my response to remove the subsequent explanation is flagrantly dishonest. Here's the bit you deliberately missed in order to misrepresent me:

"that's the job of the IDF. I would hazard a guess, however, that cutting off aid, food, water and killing tens of thousands of civilians - including Israeli hostages - isn't strictly "necessary"."

I thought you were above this. Apparently, you're not. Please spend less time jerking your knees at people expressing an opinion no less controversial than "Israel shouldn't do war crimes" - a sentiment YOU AGREE WITH.

There was absolutely nothing dishonest about my post. I frequently limit my quotes to that part of a post that is relevant yo whatever comment I intend to make.

I was curious about what you felt might be necessary, not what you deem not "strictly 'necessary'". Your response was evasive at best. Stop whining.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
There was absolutely nothing dishonest about my post.
Yes there was.

I frequently limit my quotes to that part of a post that is relevant yo whatever comment I intend to make.
You accused me of "dancing" despite me directly addressing your criticism, and you deliberately omitted the part of my post where I did. You cannot pretend it was not deliberate.

I was curious about what you felt might be necessary, not what you deem not "strictly 'necessary'"
Now who's dancing?

Your response was evasive at best. Stop whining.
This is pathetic and beneath you. Do better.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
There are many Christians there too, who don't seem to get a look in. Many of them have also condemned Israel.

Yes, and I believe the fact that victims of Israel's policies are not exclusively Muslim bears repetition and emphasis. The world's oldest Christian community, located in Bethlehem, canceled all celebrations last Christmas in response to Israel's actions in Gaza:

Brother John Vinh, a Franciscan monk from Vietnam who has lived in Jerusalem for six years, told the AP in Bethlehem that a nativity scheme in the Square showed baby Jesus wrapped in a white shroud, evoking a similar image of the thousands of children killed in Gaza.

 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Yes, and I believe the fact that victims of Israel's policies are not exclusively Muslim bears repetition and emphasis. The world's oldest Christian community, located in Bethlehem, canceled all celebrations last Christmas in response to Israel's actions in Gaza:



Another group of victims is, of course, Jews:


 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Yes, and I believe the fact that victims of Israel's policies are not exclusively Muslim bears repetition and emphasis.

Yet you ignore the reasons for those policies: the unjust war that is waged against israel and jews by the nation of Palestine.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And I do not agree.

What would you view as necessary to eliminate Hamas as an existential threat and free the hostages?
This pro Israel position is either deluded paranoia
or outright dishonesty.
Hamas doesn't pose an existential threat to Israel
which has full military & financial backing of the
most powerful country on the planet.
Treating Hamas as an existential threat a facade to
justify unleashing overkill, massacring tens of thousands
of innocents in bogus pursuit of "eliminating" Hamas,
& then driving the survivors out of Gaza permanently.
This last goal is the final criterion to make it genocide
under the 1948 UN definition
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
An inadequate gesture is mere propaganda.

The bottleneck on aid distribution is not israeli. Air drops of aid are also ongoing. Diversification of distribution methods in this way reduces looting and bandits which have become a problem. The aid to Gaza is increasing.

The point is: israel's intention is not to harm the innocent civilians directly via bombs or indirectly by blocking aid. They do not intend to drive them from their homes, steal their land, or the the other anti-israel talking points which are being regurgitated. They are documenting their actions, per the ICJ's request. There is accountability and transparency built into the SLA framework. That's it's "raison d'etre".
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The bottleneck on aid distribution is not israeli. Air drops of aid are also ongoing. Diversification of distribution methods in this way reduces looting and bandits which have become a problem. The aid to Gaza is increasing.

The point is: israel's intention is not to harm the innocent civilians directly via bombs or indirectly by blocking aid. They do not intend to drive them from their homes, steal their land, or the the other anti-israel talking points which are being regurgitated. They are documenting their actions, per the ICJ's request. There is accountability and transparency built into the SLA framework. That's it's "raison d'etre".
Words say one thing.
Actions say something very different.
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Words say one thing.
Actions say something very different.

The actions are the convoy of trucks that are now reaching northern Gaza in spite of UNRWA/HAMAS. The actions are the air-drops of aid scattered across Gaza. The actions are the repair of water lines. The actions are the rebuilding of bakeries and providing them with flour. The actions are protection of safe neighborhoods in central Gaza where markets are operating and the suffering is manageable. The actions are DAILY pauses in military operations in 6 hour increments to permit movement throughout the war zone to access support services. The actions are field hospitals setup throughout Gaza. The actions are opening the ports to naval hospitals docking off the coast of Gaza. The actions are delivering fuel to the hospitals and securing those deliveries.

The actions are the warnings given to the public, surrendering the military advantage of a surprise attack.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What is your method for collecting evidence of the lack of military necessity of israel's actions?
News, eg, soldiers shooting children, shooting people
in the back of the head, shooting into crowds of civilians,
shooting their own hostages holding a white flag,
the stated intention of prioritizing destruction over
accuracy.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Some people are throwing the word "genocide" around here like it's candy being tossed around at a parade.

If Israel were to use actual genocide, they would begin to kill and/or detain all Palestinians in all areas that it controls. Are they doing that? Obviously, not.

OTOH, if "Palestinians" would get the upper hand, what do you think they would do? We've already seen some of what they would do on 10-7.

Let me leave some here again with this question: If a group of terrorists send by a governing power, gang raped your daughter, kidnapped your son, and is firing rockets into your village, what do you propose doing? just talk about it? relitigate the past? I'll tell ya right now what most of you would most likely do as we've seen so many examples of this in the past: Pearl Harbor; bombing cities during WWII; 9-11; etc.

I know I keep asking this question, but I don't get any responses from those who simply just can't deal with reality but yet are so willing to blame Israel for basically everything. There's a name for that kind of bigotry.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
I haven't seen any evidence of rape occurring except from the Israeli propaganda machine, there were no rape kits, DNA evidence etc. I've even heard reports that half the Israelis killed were by friendly fire
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I haven't seen any evidence of rape occurring except from the Israeli propaganda machine, there were no rape kits, DNA evidence etc. I've even heard reports that half the Israelis killed were by friendly fire

Maybe try this: Sexual and gender-based violence in the 7 October attack on Israel - Wikipedia

Also, an elderly women released about three weeks ago said she saw one of the younger woman gang-raped while in one of the tunnels. But then, do you really give a damn?
 
Top