Jordan and Syria were already inhabited by Muslims. I meant that it is unnatural to take an entire nation and transfer them into a country which is already occupied by another nation.
Actually, Jordan was pretty much inhabited by nobody.
What they did was take an entire nation - the Hashemites of the Hijaz, which was invaded and conquered by another nation, the Saudis of the Nejd, and place them to rule over a loosely defined area of the British Mandate of Palestine East of the Jordan river.
The area was sparsely populated by various Arab tribes at the time.
After the establishment of the State of Israel, many of the Arab refugees ended up in Transjordan, East of the Jordan river and then, of course, in Jordan, West of the Jordan river.
Jordan tried to absorb most of those particular tribes until they tried to overthrow the government of Jordan (Black September) at which point, Jordan kicked out that "Palestinian" nation where they migrated to Lebanon to destroy that country until the Israelis finally kicked them out of there...
But, from the tone of your response, it doesn't really matter what nation invaded what nation and occupied them, you appear to believe that as long as they are Muslim and not Jewish or Christian or any other Middle Eastern religion, it's okay.
But, if they were to be Jewish or Christian or some other tribal religion, even though they had lived there for the last 3,000 years, it's not okay because they aren't Muslim.
Isn't that a tad racist?