• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israeli Duty to Warn? What unmitigated gall (chutzpah)

Israeli Duty to Warn? What unmitigated gall (chutzpah)


  • Total voters
    15

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
And almost all are still Jewish, and still Israeli, and still crying out for "an eye for an eye". As their Talmud tells teaches.
Actually, it's from the Torah, but the Talmud adds qualifications and limitations.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
In fact, Hamas is inextricably entwined with both. But that's a good trick, there, making them appear as if they're some violent rogue entity having no connection to the abuse of the Palestinian people by Israeli Jews or the abuse of many Muslim nations by the oil-hungry (mostly Christian) west.
"Good trick"? "Making them appear"? That is as stupid as it is slanderous. My long-standing position on the occupation should be clear to anyone not drunk on their own vitriol.

I'm done with you.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
So how do you weigh that against the fact that Palestinians voted in leaders whose stated charter is the total destruction of Israel?

It seems to me that that changes the conversation about what ought to constitute war crimes - at least to some degree?

Well you seemed wrong .. as it does not change the conversation in any way shape or form ... does not change the definition of a war crime. That the Occupied hates the Occupier does not change fact that that Israel has committed countless war crimes and crimes against humanity .. prior to October 7.

That the Zionist charter is the removal of all the "Animals" from the Promised land .. the "Cleansing of the Promised Land" changes the conversation how ? Does this make the extermination of thousands of Children, so many Biden says he doesn't believe it, any less a war crime ?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
"Good trick"? "Making them appear"? That is as stupid as it is slanderous. My long-standing position on the occupation should be clear to anyone not drunk on their own vitriol.

I'm done with you.
I find it useful to regularly state long held positions.
It helps others remember. Criminy, not too long ago
I had to correct one poster that I am not a creationist.
 

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
And yet a rocket(s) were fired out of Gaza by Hamas towards Tel Aviv last week, so they obviously have no intention to surrender.
Umm .. remember..

On 31 July 2024, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas, was assassinated along with his personal bodyguard in the Iranian capital Tehran by an apparent Israeli attack.

I believe he was responsible for negotiations .. who would that be now, then?
The truth is, that Netanyahu and co. are not interested in peace .. they see that they
have the backing of the US administration to carry on with the war .. escalate the war.

Netantyahu has already reported to have said that Iran is going to get a bloody nose.

..so what is there to surrender from? You think that Israel is going to stop harassing Palestinians?
Of course not.

Hezbollah said the rockets over the northern border would stop, if the genocide in Gaza would stop.
..and that didn't happen.

The world population aren't fools. The longer the Israeli offensive goes on, the more there is for the
world to remember. :expressionless:

You can't subjugate the opinion of a significant proportion of the world through military might.
You can try .. but it spells eventual failure, and consequences.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Hamas, unprovoked and without warning, attacked Israel on Saturday, October 7. The Israelis, as was inevitable, fought back, hopefully hard. The New York Times' print edition contained an article "Gazans With Nowhere to Hide Issue a Plea: At Least Warn Us." The Times' electronic edition (link, not paywalled) modified the headline to "Nowhere to Hide in Gaza as Israeli Onslaught Continues." Either way, the article and contents constitute unmitigated gall, or, as the Yiddish expression goes, chutzpah. Excerpts:

The UN High Commissioner for human rights continues this thoroughly disingenuous theme:

Both the "Gazans" and Mr. Türk miss the delicious irony; Hamas gave no "warning" to the attendees at a rock concert that it killed, tortured and/or kidnapped. Ditto the Israeli homes invaded. Presumably, Israel is to meekly accept these attacks. The Gazans, somehow, are entitled to warnings so they can fight another day. The Israeli rock concert attendees, and other innocents, should just die.

After all, they are only the Joooooos, and should follow the pattern they adopted during the Shoah, with 6,000,000 going down with barely a whimper.
Sounds like you're equating Hamas with the people of Gaza.

FYI: while Hamas didn't warn Israel of the impending attack, Israeli intelligence warned Netanyahu 4 separate times about an impending attack before Oct. 7 happened.


Saudi Arabia and Egypt also warned Israel:

A statement on Saturday from Saudi Foreign Ministry emphasized the plight of the Palestinians, saying the kingdom had warned repeatedly “of the dangers of the explosion of the situation as a result of the continued occupation, the deprivation of the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights and the repetition of systemic provocations against its sanctities.”


Egyptian intelligence had warned Israel of 'something big' from Gaza but Israeli officials focused on the West Bank, The Associated Press reported on Monday. An Egyptian intelligence official said Egypt had spoken repeatedly with the Israelis about "something big" but Israeli officials played down the threat from Gaza. "We have warned them an explosion of the situation is coming, and very soon, and it would be big. But they underestimated such warnings,” the official was quoted as saying by the AP.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Sounds like you're equating Hamas with the people of Gaza.

FYI: while Hamas didn't warn Israel of the impending attack, Israeli intelligence warned Netanyahu 4 separate times about an impending attack before Oct. 7 happened.


Saudi Arabia and Egypt also warned Israel:





One might conclude that Netanyahu intended that
many Israelis die, so that he could go to war for
political benefit....which he appears to currently enjoy.
 

jbg

Active Member
Umm .. remember..

On 31 July 2024, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas, was assassinated along with his personal bodyguard in the Iranian capital Tehran by an apparent Israeli attack.

I believe he was responsible for negotiations .. who would that be now, then?
The truth is, that Netanyahu and co. are not interested in peace .. they see that they
have the backing of the US administration to carry on with the war .. escalate the war.
Is a massacre a starting point for negotiations?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
One can only hope.
You're hoping for a larger scale war?
Perhaps you're unaware of how much taxpayer money
was spent fighting Iraq over so many years. Iran is
more capable. So USA would spend even more money
& years killing even more people.
Do you think this would go un-noticed by other
Muslim countries, & by major players (Russia, China)
sensing opportunity to weaken USA, & gain power
in the region.
Hoping for war is stupid, inhumane, & just plain wrong.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Umm .. remember..

On 31 July 2024, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas, was assassinated along with his personal bodyguard in the Iranian capital Tehran by an apparent Israeli attack.

Um, remember that Hamas attacked unarmed civilians on 10-7, and you actually think that's justified. Sick.
 

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
Is a massacre a starting point for negotiations?
There is no "starting point" as far as Netanyahu & co. is concerned.

They have made that very clear .. before as well as after Oct 7. :expressionless:
Naturally, Netanyahu & co. want to paint a picture of "animals attacking civilians" ,
as that justifies his genocide .. or so he thinks.

Exaggeration and disinformation is all part of his war .. his agenda for the region.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
If it comes to that I hope that they do. As it is the number of Hamas dead and wounded probably already greatly outnumber the Israeli dead and wounded. I do not mind punishing Hamas, but I do not want to see innocent civilians harmed. Restraint must be used.
:facepalm:
 

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
Um, remember that Hamas attacked unarmed civilians on 10-7..
How could I forget! .. what were Netanyahu and co. thinking?
Where were the IDF in their watchtowers?
Why didn't they heed the multiple warnings from various nations and their own security forces?

I tell you what is sick .. trying to justify killing masses of people in bombing raids and destroying the vast majority of buildings and infrastructure, because they apparently didn't secure their 'Gaza prison' properly!

It's all too "convenient", in my view.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
They were fooled. We elected Trump. He is not much better. People make mistakes. And now they have suffered for it. But the people to punish are those that misled them and broke international law. Imprison them. Don't harm civilians. And especially not children who had nothing to do with the decision making process.

No side is innocent here. I do not want Israel to become the monster that Hamas currently is.
So how do you totally eradicate Hamas? I think an international force must step in and take over for Israel. This international force can take it's time, minimize "civilian" casualties, be under international scrutiny, all the good things, but it must completely remove Hamas from Gaza. Once that's done, it must stay in Gaza and make sure no terrorist organizations return.
 
Top