Your posts veer off into histrionic personalYou’re the one making up BS.
criticism because they defend Israel without
being able to defend its heinous acts. So the
ad hominem is the only argument available.
Such bigotry. Such evil.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your posts veer off into histrionic personalYou’re the one making up BS.
No. That’s what YOU did. Cite the post in this thread where I did what you accuse me of. Try it. You’re so blinded by hatred that you can’t even see straight. Your comprehension skills on this matter are non-existent.Your posts veer off into histrionic personal
criticism because they defend Israel without
being able to defend its heinous acts. So the
ad hominem is the only argument available.
Such bigotry. Such evil.
Doubling down again on the ad hominem argument, eh.You’re so blinded by hatred that you can’t even see straight. Your comprehension skills on this matter are non-existent.
I asked you for evidence. I invited you to cite the post in this thread that clearly triggered you. You can’t do it. You’ve provided no evidence that I hate Muslims or that I continually defend Israel.Doubling down again on the ad hominem argument, eh.
You need new material. Aside from being tedious, it still
doesn't justify your continual defense of Israel's oppression
& genocide.
Why hate Muslims? What did they ever do to you?
I don't recall that. I skip the nastierI asked you for evidence.
You asked a question with an embeddedI invited you to cite the post in this thread that clearly triggered you.
Another rhetorical trick, ie, claim that yourYou can’t do it.
Oh, that.You’ve provided no evidence that I hate Muslims or that I continually defend Israel.
Thank you for proving my point (again). You’re creating a long track record of being unable to point to any evidence, post, or other information that supports your ridiculous claims against me. I’ve made invitations. You attack. I ask you to cite a lost to support your position. You attack.I don't recall that. I skip the nastier
& more tedious parts of your posts.
Not worth reading.
You asked a question with an embedded
insult, ie, "triggered". Calm down.
Try to be civil. Think about issues.
If you want to discuss something, then
go ahead.....without hostility in the posts.
Another rhetorical trick, ie, claim that your
challenges can't be met. It doesn't work.
Oh, that.
Your posts filled with blind defense of Israel's
every evil act, & your personal attacks on Israel's
critics demonstrate inhumanity towards Muslims.
Let's not forget that you're avoiding the issue with
accusations of hating Israel. Such deflection by
veiled bigoted barbs of anti-semitism serve to
deny Israel's crimes. That bespeaks hating Muslims.
You're still at this?Thank you for proving my point (again).
I can go all night. You going to provide any evidence to back up your claims against me?You're still at this?
Like a dog with a bone.
That's not what she said.I can go all night.
Thanks so much boss for "giving me a chance", ffs.
Tell me how you interpret paragraph 20. I've copied it here, not for your benefit, but for everyone else who is reading this thread. I think your feeble attempts at gaslighting will be clear to everyone, nice job:
This isn't the only paragraph that supports my claim, but it's a good place to start.
Much like the Quran, the charter is riddled with inconsistencies. If I lived in Israel paragraph 20, all by itself, would be quite troubling.Looks like you stopped reading before the part that describes the 1967 Israel-Palestine border as the "national consensus" that Hamas supports.
As I've said several times in this thread, I hold the UN accountable.BTW: I'm still waiting for you to explain why people who were born after an election should be held responsible for its outcome.
Much like the Quran, the charter is riddled with inconsistencies. If I lived in Israel paragraph 20, all by itself, would be quite troubling.
I'm not sure what this has to do with what you quoted.As I've said several times in this thread, I hold the UN accountable.
It's not worth my time to connect obvious dots for you. Especially when you strawman my positions, sigh."Their charter is riddled with inconsistencies" doesn't really come close to "Palestinians voted in leaders whose stated charter is the total destruction of Israel," which was your original position and your justification fot why you think it's okay to murder Palestinian civilians indiscriminately.
I'm not sure what this has to do with what you quoted.
We tried that in Lebanon with, I think, Security Council resolution 1701. Not very promising since the UN is anti-Jewish.So how do you totally eradicate Hamas? I think an international force must step in and take over for Israel. This international force can take it's time, minimize "civilian" casualties, be under international scrutiny, all the good things, but it must completely remove Hamas from Gaza. Once that's done, it must stay in Gaza and make sure no terrorist organizations return.