• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

It just seems like religion only benefits men...

GardenLady

Active Member
I grew up in the ALC synod, which later merged into the ELCA, because of problems I had in the late 1960's with their anti-science [opposed to the ToE] and the blatant racism at my former church.

I'm not familiar with the ALC history, but the ELCA is currently the more progressive synod, not anti-science, not biblical literalists, and with female pastors and open communion for baptized Christians. In some previous encounters, I have heard anti-ToE, anti deep time, biblical literalism, and opposition to ordination of women from those in the Missouri and Wisconsin synods.
 

Ashoka

श्री कृष्णा शरणं मम
The claim is made in the post but where is the evidence?

I pointed to a post where quotes were made by popular theologians. That's the post I am talking about. Not the first post. For simplicity, I will post it here:

I was Catholic for a while. I saw that it was full of blatant misogyny. Women cannot become priests. Popes have spoken against women serving at the altar. Some object to altar girls, or even Eucharistic ministers. In my diocese, women can't even do readings.

Church fathers have also had some nasty things to say about women. Tertullian said that a woman is a temple built over a sewer. St. Jerome thought pregnant women were disgusting and shouldn't be allowed out in public. Clement of Alexandria said that "Every woman should be filled with shame with the thought that she is a woman." Aquinas taught that women were a genetic mistake.

I'm sorry, I mean no rudeness, I am simply pointing out how women have been viewed throughout history, especially in religion. We can partake, but only in a limited way. We can practice, but only if a man oversees it and says it's okay.
 

GardenLady

Active Member
During their teenage years their brains go temporarily insane.

I find this highly offensive. It is entirely consistent with the historic and outdated perception of [women + hormones = instability], which has been used to limit the legal, educational, and employment opportunities of women.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I find this highly offensive. It is entirely consistent with the historic and outdated perception of [women + hormones = instability], which has been used to limit the legal, educational, and employment opportunities of women.
Very sorry. Its physiological truth, not intended to be offensive; and if we can't talk about it then perhaps we shouldn't ever hope to tackle human trafficking. The truth is there is a hell of a lot of human trafficking even today, and that is made possible by human psychology. We're all a little bit nuts.
 

JustGeorge

Imperfect
Staff member
Premium Member
Very sorry. Its physiological truth, not intended to be offensive; and if we can't talk about it then perhaps we shouldn't ever hope to tackle human trafficking. The truth is there is a hell of a lot of human trafficking even today, and that is made possible by human psychology. We're all a little bit nuts.

Its possible teenage girls go temporarily insane. I suspect I may have.

However, teenage boys also seem to, as well. Mine certainly has.

I think teenagers in general could be classified as insane... though I believe the truth is, its not really insanity. Its just a lot of change, physical and chemical in the body, and a mess of change and pressure from society at the same time...

Well, its enough to drive anyone nuts.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I'm not familiar with the ALC history, but the ELCA is currently the more progressive synod, not anti-science, not biblical literalists, and with female pastors and open communion for baptized Christians. In some previous encounters, I have heard anti-ToE, anti deep time, biblical literalism, and opposition to ordination of women from those in the Missouri and Wisconsin synods.
This is why I wrote "That was then and this is now", so some positions from the 1960's within the ALC Synod has changed and become much more liberal.

The ALC [American Lutheran Church] came mostly from Scandinavian and German settlers here in the States, but later then merged with the LCA and a couple of other synods to form the ELCA. My mother's side was Swedish, thus this is the church I was raised in.

I had thoughts about going into the ministry, and when my Catholic wife and I first got married, we went to my church, but when the problems I raised became overwhelmingly evident, we switch and started going to her local Catholic parish. However, I didn't convert until many years later.

And you are correct that the Missouri, and especially the Wisconsin Synods. are much more conservative, and we have friends in both.
 
Religions have, throughout history, in some form, denigrated women. I'm coming to the conclusion that women don't gain much from religion. So what's the point? Why should a woman even want to be religious?

Thoughts?

I worry about this too
But my mother, cousins, and many other women in history are religious
Maybe they see it differently ?
 
The buying and the selling of women is the typical human state. Women are frequently flooded with oxytocin and various strong hormones creating psychological problems for them. During their teenage years their brains go temporarily insane. They are incredibly vulnerable. Look up books on how pimps manipulate women. You will see that they are particularly vulnerable to manipulation and enslavement. Now look again about books on human psychology and our tendency towards dominating others. You'll see misogyny is the natural state of humanity.

Teen boys are manipulated too
 
I see. It sounds like God really did a number on Eve. No wonder she is given more grace. But I agree with you, no matter what the natural corruption we are inclined towards is we should still become just, and perform our duties to one another, part of which is not being sexist in my opinion.

Do you think God hated Eve more? What do you mean
 

Lain

Well-Known Member
Do you think God hated Eve more? What do you mean

At the Fall: "to the woman He said, I will greatly multiply thy pains and thy groanings; in pain thou shalt bring forth children, and thy submission shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."

Here are some commentaries on what this entails. I mean what I said, and I don't think you got it. God bless.
 
At the Fall: "to the woman He said, I will greatly multiply thy pains and thy groanings; in pain thou shalt bring forth children, and thy submission shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."

Here are some commentaries on what this entails. I mean what I said, and I don't think you got it. God bless.

THis resources are just sexist but maybe God is too
 
Top