Atheist scientists usurped Christian scientific method? You're kidding, right? No...perhaps you're not. *shrugs*
Explain to me, perhaps, what supernatural means to you, and how this concept can be used in science? Speaking for myself, I'm a methodological naturalist, which is possibly an unusual label for an atheist. It could/should make some sense to a Christian though. What are your thoughts?
Atheist scientists usurped Christian scientific method? You're kidding, right? No...perhaps you're not. *shrugs*
Explain to me, perhaps, what supernatural means to you, and how this concept can be used in science? Speaking for myself, I'm a methodological naturalist, which is possibly an unusual label for an atheist. It could/should make some sense to a Christian though. What are your thoughts?
I have more to say about the first comment than the second. My answer to the second may not be what you're looking for.
I assume you know who the father of the scientific method is. I would agree with him that that was what the Christian scientists at the time were ignoring. As for my statement, you took it out of context. I was referring to Charles Lyell who wrote
Principles of Geology. I would say he's the first one to publicly criticize catastrophism or that the geological changes to the Earth happened rapidly. What he found, he proposed new theories of how the Earth was formed slowly and could back it up with examples of what he found in his travels. You have to understand this brought about a century of change, so the creationists at the time were feeling a lot of pressure.
"Uniform Processes of Change
Lyell's version of geology came to be known as uniformitarianism, because of his fierce insistence that the processes that alter the Earth are uniform through time. Like Hutton, Lyell viewed the history of Earth as being vast and directionless. And the history of life was no different.
Lyell crafted a powerful lens for viewing the history of the Earth. On Darwin's voyage aboard the
Beagle, for example, he was able to decipher the history of the Canary Islands (right) by applying Lyell's ideas to the volcanic rock he encountered there. Today satellite measurements reveal that mountains may rise an inch a year, while radioactive clocks help show how they've been rising that way for millions of years. But Lyell could never have grasped the mechanism — plate tectonics — that makes this kind of geological change happen.
Yet geologists today also know that some of the factors that changed the Earth in the past cannot be seen at work today. For example, the early Earth was pummeled by gigantic hunks of solar debris, some as big as Mars. For the first one or two billion years of Earth's history, plate tectonics didn't even exist as we know it today.
Lyell had an equally profound effect on our understanding of life's history. He influenced Darwin so deeply that Darwin envisioned evolution as a sort of biological uniformitarianism. Evolution took place from one generation to the next before our very eyes, he argued, but it worked too slowly for us to perceive."
Uniformitarianism: Charles Lyell
What do plate tectonics signify though? Catastrophism.
As for supernatural, it simply is creationism. I think the creation scientists themselves can explain better than I here what the problems are.
"If creation is scientific, then why don’t you publish in peer-reviewed secular journals?"
Creationism, Science and Peer Review - creation.com
If that isn't a sufficient answer, then what type of answers were you looking for in regards to creationism?