Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Maybe I missed it, but did the site itself specifically state that it's aim was to "eradicate religion", or is that just how the OP presented it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One would hope. What's your point?
No, I don't. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Actually, it's mostly side conversations, I don't think there's been any meaningful discussion of the OP. My amusement at the melodramatic phrasing certainly doesn't count.So far it seems this thread is just 10+ pages of an unwarranted knee jerk reaction.
About the Reason Project | The Reason ProjectMaybe I missed it, but did the site itself specifically state that it's aim was to "eradicate religion", or is that just how the OP presented it?
About Section said:The Reason Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. Drawing on the talents of the most prominent and creative thinkers across a wide range of disciplines, The Reason Project seeks to encourage critical thinking and wise public policy through a variety of interrelated projects. The foundation will convene conferences, produce films, sponsor scientific studies and opinion polls, publish original research, award grants to other charitable organizations, and offer material support to religious dissidents and public intellectuals all with the purpose of eroding the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.
While the foundation is devoted to fostering critical thinking generally, we believe that religious ideas require a special focus. Both science and the arts are built upon cultures of vigorous self-criticism; religious discourse is not. As a result, unwarranted religious beliefs still reign unchallenged in almost every society on earthdividing humanity from itself, inflaming conflict, preventing wise public policy, and diverting scarce resources. One of the primary goals of The Reason Project is to change this increasingly unhealthy status quo.
We are always looking for creative ways to involve the community in our efforts. If you would like to contribute to the work of The Reason Project, please fill out a volunteer application. We encourage you to consider the work of The Reason Project your own.
Actually, it's mostly side conversations, I don't think there's been any meaningful discussion of the OP. My amusement at the melodramatic phrasing certainly doesn't count.
The op apparently does.You interpret that as "eradicating religion"?
So far it seems this thread is just 10+ pages of an unwarranted knee jerk reaction.
That was what I was thinking when I hit FH's comment. When in the company of those who believe in an invisible friend one has to expect this type of reaction.You are aware that you're on RF, right?
No, I don't. Stop putting words in my mouth.
My quarrel with this statement is that it characterizes all religions as imperialistic and seeking political power. They're not.Let's press the reset button. Here is my first post on the topic...
"I see very little political distinction between religion and communism. Both are irrational, imperialistic belief systems that seeks to vault itself into power."
Would you like a lesson?(I'm not good at the forum's "quote" thing.)
When you say "religion" as if it were some monolithic entity, you include all religions.If you took this to mean I'm making a statement about your religion then you have it wrong - at least the imperialist part.
My religion is quite political, but that doesn't equate to imperialism, either. We're religious secularists.If your religion is apolitical then you have no cause to take offense.
I have little regard for those who opine from ignorance, so I'm just as glad you're not compelled to waste my time.The rationality of your religion is something else. If your beliefs have the slightest precept of divine or super natural knowledge then I consider your beliefs irrational and I have nothing more to say about that.
1) I wouldn't mind if you clarified what you meant by "political distinction."If you want to debate the veracity of the statement - that there is very little political distinction - then we have something to go on.
UU is founded upon the 7 Principles:How so?
Jackytar
I thought I made that clear, and rather suspect you're being deliberately obtuse.I would hope that your congregation values constitutional, liberal democracy. Otherwise you get proposition 8.
You asked how my religion was political, I answered. I already told you we're religious secularists. We're still religious, though, and I doubt the so-called "Reason Project" would have us.Other than that, these are all secular notions that your religion has co-opted. So what are you telling me? That your religion is secularism? Perhaps you should join the Reason Project.