Then Jesus need not have gone to the cross ,if you and everyone else , were fine on their own .Ah, the old "everyone is evil and deserves to burn in hell" argument. Sorry, but it doesn't wash.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then Jesus need not have gone to the cross ,if you and everyone else , were fine on their own .Ah, the old "everyone is evil and deserves to burn in hell" argument. Sorry, but it doesn't wash.
By Definition the word literally means ' good news ' . Gospel.Just because the writers (or the compilers) say it is good news does not make it so. The reasons for it not being good news have also been clearly articulated. I also counted them out: 2 bad news and 1 conditional good news are presented in the gospel. You have failed to show why these reasons are incorrect. To still insist that the gospels are good news seems irrational on your part. But what you choose to believe is up to you of course.
I think the reality is that no created being can ever be perfect simply because only God is God, only God is perfect. Human beings are not God; never will be, therefore on our own or by our own less than God ability cannot be perfect. The sensible love offered by God is that He provides a way to receive righteousness and perfection through Christ as a free gift. God does not desire any to be separated from Him in eternal damnation with satan, but neither does He force anyone into heaven. Each one is free to choose to be in the new heaven and earth with Him forever or not. That is true freedom and love.And this is exactly the thing which makes the belief set so monstrous. Its sets up a false dichotomy of perfect imperfect. Well, God is a loving father who is set on bringing up his children. His preference is teaching us. He tailors how he responds to where we are. Does he hate sin? Yes. But he loves his children. There is no sense of that love in this "You aren't perfect so I'm condemning you to eternal hell" kind of thing. No love at all.
Psalm 19Ok, should they know then? How does it work?
How do people infer the Christian God just by observing "creation"?
Ciao
- viole
The truth is that 10 out of 10 people die . The truth ( according to the bible) is that without God a person does indeed end up in hell . Now this isn't the ' Gospel ' this is the reality of peoples destiny without Christ .As I said: The gospel has 2 bad news (we are sinners and that we deserve hell) and 1 conditional good news (that if we believe in Jesus we get saved from hell). To still say that the gospel has entirely or predominantly good news seems irrational when you too agree that these are the three basic points of the gospel.
I also showed what would be considered a true gospel: that God does not consider us sinners at all and everybody will be going to heaven (or be one with God). This alternative gospel will be entirely good news and hence a true gospel in the literal sense of the word.
Before you repeat that you disagree, you need to tell me which part of what I am saying you are disagreeing with. Are you saying that
a) the news that we are sinners is actually good news?
b) Are you saying that the news that we, in the default state are going to hell is a good news?
c) Are you saying that the statements a) and b) are not said in the gospel?
d) Are you saying my counting of the two bad news and one conditional good news is wrong? If so how?
e) Are you saying that the alternative gospel formulated is somehow a less of a good news than your Christian version? If so how?
If you have any other reasons to share, please do. Reasons.
I will be honest. From my point of view, I am suspecting that you are thinking somewhat like this.
"the book is called the gospel, so it must be good news. Hence I believe its good news. Because otherwise I will disbelieve God's word which I believe the gospel to be. I cannot disbelieve God's word as I will then go to hell as the gospel says. So I must believe the gospel is good news so that I can go to heaven."
I would like to be proven wrong in this conjecture. I will await your reply.
That's not the point. The question is, will a loving father reject his children simply because they are not perfect? That is not a loving father, that is an abusive father. A loving father disciplines and teaches his children so that they become better, raises them to maturity. He doesn't cast them aside because they don't meet the standard of perfection.I think the reality is that no created being can ever be perfect simply because only God is God
Jesus' death accomplished nothing. There was no reason for it. I'm sorry.Then Jesus need not have gone to the cross ,if you and everyone else , were fine on their own .
We only become a ' child of God ' through the new birth. John 1.12 . Every one who is not ' born again ' and in Christ, is not a child of God .That's not the point. The question is, will a loving father reject his children simply because they are not perfect? That is not a loving father, that is an abusive father. A loving father disciplines and teaches his children so that they become better, raises them to maturity. He doesn't cast them aside because they don't meet the standard of perfection.
That's not what the bible says .Jesus' death accomplished nothing. There was no reason for it. I'm sorry.
The 1st truth is obvious.The truth is that 10 out of 10 people die . The truth ( according to the bible) is that without God a person does indeed end up in hell . Now this isn't the ' Gospel ' this is the reality of peoples destiny without Christ .
So what? The book's name is wrong then.By Definition the word literally means ' good news ' . Gospel.
You're conflating "beliefs" with "facts" and "objective" with "subjective", thus it might be wiser to start your sentence off with "I believe...".We only become a ' child of God ' through the new birth. John 1.12 . Every one who is not ' born again ' and in Christ, is not a child of God .
The bible says We only become a ' child of God ' through the new birth. John 1.12 . Every one who is not ' born again ' and in Christ, is not a child of God . According to the bible.You're conflating "beliefs" with "facts" and "objective" with "subjective", thus it might be wiser to start your sentence off with "I believe...".
Would my odds to go to Heaven be higher, lower, equal?
ciao
- viole
oh dearPsalm 19
Psalm 19
Kjv
19 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
Rom 1
( This describes how people wind up worshipping Turtles and elephants also)
18¶For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24¶Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
That's according to the Bible along with the view that the Bible is absolutely inerrant, which really makes it a form of idolatry. The Bible is about God from a subjective perspective, but with that being said, it isn't God. The Church never viewed the Bible as being totally inerrant or perfect.The bible says We only become a ' child of God ' through the new birth. John 1.12 . Every one who is not ' born again ' and in Christ, is not a child of God . According to the bible.
I would be interested in further elaboration of your thoughts.
That's according to the Bible along with the view that the Bible is absolutely inerrant, which really makes it a form of idolatry. The Bible is about God from a subjective perspective, but with that being said, it isn't God. The Church never viewed the Bible as being totally inerrant or perfect.
The good news? The good news is that God, who loves you, also has plans to torture you for all of eternity. Why? Because you were born into a world where you need to be saved from deserved torture. BUT, because he does love you, he has allowed an escape clause from his eternal damnation. The clause is, he wants you to believe he came down in human form, to have himself murdered 2,000 years ago. Then he went back to heaven where he came from. He did this on your behalf so that he doesn't have to punish you for what you do wrong. The good news is, a human sacrifice event, a vicarious redemption, has to be believed or you will be tortured for all of eternity. I'd call this very sad news, not good news at all.
Actually, this is what you asked " Ok, should they know then? How does it work?oh dear
I asked you how to infer things without the Bible, and you clarify that by mentioning the Bible? Lol
is that all Christianity reduces to? A pointless exercise of circular reasoning, that collapses after the simplest logical challenge?
ciao
- viole