It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?

[Shad]

And to quote said study:

We find that the probability of an unarmed black suspect being killed by a white police officer is significantly greater than the probability of a black suspect being killed by a black police officer.

I never endorsed the study. I searched around for a bit and found a common reference.

 

[Rational Agnostic]

I thought you read her tweet

I did. What is wrong with it?

 

[The Reverend Bob]

I did. What is wrong with it?

Go read it again.

 

[Shad]

Bring 'em. Let us look at those raw numbers.

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

It is a few years behind. The other sources I found do not link perpetrators with the victims. I didn't find anything like the linked source on the FBI's website. It just has the total sums without the linked between the individuals.

The question itself is invalid as the causes of crime are not determined by strict demographics nor do demographics explain much. A crime involving family for example could be blamed on a relationship issue which isn't unique.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

It is a few years behind. The other sources I found do not link perpetrators with the victims. I didn't find anything like the linked source on the FBI's website. It just has the total sums without the linked between the individuals.

The question itself is invalid as the causes of crime are not determined by strict demographics nor do demographics explain much. A crime involving family for example could be blamed on a relationship issue which isn't unique.

It's not telling us much about white/black police officers killing unarmed people

 

[Shad]

It's not telling us much about white/black police officers killing unarmed people

That link was about violence based on victim/perpetrator demographics not cops.

You are asking for data from two topics in two conversations with two different users. I should have been more clear.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

That link was about violence based on victim/perpetrator demographics not cops.

You are asking for data from two topics in two conversations with two different users. I should have been more clear.

I was asking @Stanyon for the raw numbers when he said more black cops shoot unarmed black people than white cops shoot unarmed black people.

So I ask again.
Where is the data?

 

[Shad]

I was asking @Stanyon for the raw numbers when he said more black cops shoot unarmed black people than white cops shoot unarmed black people.

So I ask again.
Where is the data?

I told you the second link was about violence involving demographics. It was in response to It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?

 

[Shad]

And to quote said study:

We find that the probability of an unarmed black suspect being killed by a white police officer is significantly greater than the probability of a black suspect being killed by a black police officer.

You are adding a criteria not present before. The question was not about unarmed.

It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?

 

[Stanyon]

I was asking @Stanyon for the raw numbers when he said more black cops shoot unarmed black people than white cops shoot unarmed black people

That's not quite what I said is it? Maybe you misunderstood my post or you are simply lying and or misrepresenting what I said for your own benefit.your style is very familiar

 

[The Reverend Bob]

That's not quite what I said is it? Maybe you misunderstood my post or you are simply lying and or misrepresenting what I said for your own benefit.your style is very familiar

You know we can read your post

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Black cops kill equal to or greater number of blacks than white cops, this is a fact. Why do you think news outlets typically report mostly only the "white cop shoots black suspect" stories?

Irrelevant to what I said.

 

[metis]

Wiki? That's the best you can do as a "teacher" of CR?
You'll understand , even if you aren't able to, that I don't believe a word you said.

No surprise whatsoever as you seem quite content in "projecting" dishonesty onto others who cite and link you to the realities that you are so unwilling to accept.

Either way, I'm done.

 

[Stanyon]

View attachment 31164
You know we can read your post

And "unarmed" did not appear anywhere in my post, thank you for proving my point. Unarmed or not if you charge a police officer you are asking to be shot, tazed, or beaten senseless.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

And "unarmed" did not appear anywhere in my post, thank you for proving my point. Unarmed or not if you charge a police officer you are asking to be shot, tazed, or beaten senseless.

No.no. You said that black officers kill a greater number of black people. I asked for the data.
Again, where is the data?

 

[Shad]

No.no. You said that black officers kill a greater number of black people. I asked for the data.
Again, where is the data?

I linked a study which you ignored via your injection of a premise. Ad hoc rescue

 

[Stanyon]

You said that black officers kill a greater number of black people.

They do and non LE black people kill each other at disproportionate rates.

 

[Shad]

They do and non LE black people kill each other at disproportionate rates.

It is only about 10% higher than white on white violence. Some relations between perpetrator and victim have nothing to do with community or culture. Crime involving family for example.

 

[The Reverend Bob]

I linked a study which you ignored via your injection of a premise. Ad hoc rescue

Where?

 

[The Reverend Bob]

They do and non LE black people kill each other at disproportionate rates.

Where is the data that Black LE kill more black people than white LE do?
Produce it.