• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
So? You are looking for a reason to reject the study which you had accepted as of 5 mins ago.
Which study? I haven't accepted any study because none presented have the raw numbers to back his claim. He made a claim, now he has to provide evidence or wear the Scarlet B of Bull ****
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Which study? I haven't accepted any study because none presented have the raw numbers to back his claim. He made a claim, now he has to provide evidence or wear the Scarlet B of Bull ****

You had no issue quoting part of the abstract with your injected premise. So no you accepted it until it not longer told you what you wanted to hear.

The one I just linked. Stop playing dumb.
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
You had no issue quoting part of the abstract with your injected premise. So no you accepted it until it not longer told you what you wanted to hear.

The one I just linked. Stop playing dumb.
And it said the exact opposite of what he said and you posted it yesterday not 5 minutes ago
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
No it said it was insignificant.
Really?

We find that the probability of an unarmed black suspect being killed by a white police officer is significantly greater than the probability of a black suspect being killed by a black police officer.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Really?

We find that the probability of an unarmed black suspect being killed by a white police officer is significantly greater than the probability of a black suspect being killed by a black police officer.

You are still injecting unarmed into the question. The question was never about unarmed. I linked your blunder already. Do I need to again?

Try again. Less dishonesty next time.
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
You are still injecting unarmed into the question. The question was never about unarmed. I linked your blunder already. Do I need to again?

Try again. Less dishonesty next time.
He said the black police officers killed a greater number of black people. That is what I ask for numbers on. None of you have been able to produce any any raw date that would substantiate that claim.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
He said the black police officers killed a greater number of black people. That is what I ask for numbers on. None of you have been able to produce any any raw date that would substantiate that claim.

Look at the study again. Without your fake premise. Table 8
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
I clarified with an edit in the previous post.
Which previous post. Are we playing hide and seek the post now? Hell, I don't even know where the goal post is anymore because you and stanyon been moving it around so much.

Face it, stanyon's claim was bull****
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
Yawn. You couldn't scroll up or do you not know what previous means?

It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?
You keep trying to say he said something he didn't say, Mr. Goalpost Mover. He didn't say that black officers are more likely to shoot an black suspect. He said they kill black suspects in greater numbers. Do you understand the difference number and likelihood? Does someone has have to explain that there is a difference between the two concepts? Maybe you can go back to grammar school learn the difference then come back.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
You keep trying to say he said something he didn't say, Mr. Goalpost Mover.

No I said you are injecting a premise into what he said.

He didn't say that black officers are more likely to shoot an black suspect. He said they kill black suspects in greater numbers. Do you understand the difference number and likelihood? Does someone has have to explain that there is a difference between the two concepts? Maybe you can go back to grammar school learn the difference then come back.

You had no problem quoting the abstract which was about probability. Yawn. You know probability is based on statistics right?

It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?
 
Last edited:

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
No I said you are injecting a premise into what he said.



You had no problem quoting the abstract which was about probability. Yawn

It's offensive to NOT wear a Hijab? Shame on Miss Michigan?
So you are conflating "greater number" with "likelihood"? Because I don't think you understand English very well. H
He said:
"Black cops kill equal to or greater number of blacks than white cops, this is a fact."

Do you understand the above sentence because really don't think you do.
 
Top