Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jesus peace be upon him said that he didn't come to destroy the law, he came to fulfill it. This is key here. According to this law, as I showed, anyone who is hung on the tree is cursed and I mentioned the reference. This means anywhere, if they were able to crucify Jesus peace be upon him, he wouldn't be a prophet, or it will disprove who he was or what he said he was even if they crucified him on the moon. The law of the prophets goes everywhere and not only in a certain place.
Hi
Just to add a bit, I actually do agree with the forumer who says that there are clues in the gospels that Jesus didn't die on the cross. To name a few:
He bled when pierced on the side.
He was given healing herbs/ointments when taken down from the cross.
He went into hiding and didn't proclaim himself after he left Joseph's tomb.
The above are just a few out of many.
Thanks
Syed
there are clues in the gospels that Jesus didn't die on the cross
There are indeed very strong clues in the Bible to confirm that Jesus could not and did not die on the Cross.
Regards
syed ahmad said:I completely agree that myrrh and aloe were used in burial practices, but would like to make the point that I am not aware of any practice where these two herbs, both renown for their healing properties were applied to dead bodies, and in particular such a huge amount.
These spices were used for scent a lot, where they were burnt, and in some other cases spices/oils were applied to the body in order to wash it, as mentioned in the Tamara and earlier Jewish traditions: Shab 23:5 indicates that the corpse was anointed and washed, i.e. it was first smeared with oil to remove the dirt and then washed to cleanse it of the oil.
Jesus’ body was anointed with the spices, but was not washed, so it cannot be for this reason. Furthermore, it would have been a complete waste of money and effort to wash a body with myrrh and aloe, both of which were incredibly expensive; more expensive than gold.
A further point is that, later in the gospels it is recorded that some women came to the tomb days later to 'anoint Jesus with spices'. According to Mark (15:46), Joseph took the body of Jesus and wrapped him in linen cloths. But he would not have done so if he had not already cleaned the body; otherwise the sweat and blood of the body would have stuck to the cloth. Then leaving the body for a day and a half in such a state would have made it almost impossible to access it to clean; since it would have required peeling off the sheets, which would probably have peeled off parts of the skin as well. No Jew would therefore wrap a body in linen cloths without first cleaning it. However, neither Mark nor the other gospels mention anyone washing the body of Jesus before wrapping it, which would have been the standard procedure for shrouding a dead body.
Luke 23:52-56 said:52 This man went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. 53 Then he took it down, wrapped it in a linen cloth, and laid it in a rock-hewn tomb where no one had ever been laid. 54 It was the day of Preparation, and the sabbath was beginning. 55 The women who had come with him from Galilee followed, and they saw the tomb and how his body was laid. 56 Then they returned, and prepared spices and ointments.
Matthew 27:59-60 said:59 So Joseph took the body and wrapped it in a clean linen cloth 60 and laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn in the rock. He then rolled a great stone to the door of the tomb and went away.
15:46 said:46 Then Joseph[l] bought a linen cloth, and taking down the body, wrapped it in the linen cloth, and laid it in a tomb that had been hewn out of the rock. He then rolled a stone against the door of the tomb.
Either the Qur'an is a true prophecy, delivered by a true prophet, or the Bible is a true prophecy, delivered by true prophets
.
Originally Posted by paarsurrey
There are indeed very strong clues in the Bible to confirm that Jesus could not and did not die on the Cross.
No there is not.
You have no clue what your talking about.
You promote bias and hatred of others beliefs
The 2nd thing I want to address, in that same quote of yours:
No where does the Acts or in any Pauline letters mention anything about Jesus being in India.
It is quite clear you have never read Acts or Paul's letters, because if you have read any of these NT texts, you would know this.
You are basing your claim about Jesus in India, on 19th and 20th century myth, in which a few authors. Each of these claims about India, that have cropped up every now and then, has been repeatedly refuted and rejected, and criticised for shoddy scholarship.
So you can't blame Paul about this pseudo-scholarship and pseudo-history that first began in 1869.
You should really do better research, because you are being sloppy, and no one is going to take you seriously if you keep bringing up claims that you can't back up.
It does get tiresome to hear the claims about Jesus in India. I really appreciate this post of yours. Thank you, I tried to give a frubal, but couldn't. I guess it's been too soon since the last one.
Well your factually wrong.
It is not either OR
They both could be wrong. And by all historical accounts they both are :slap:
Shad,
It's worth looking at the 'whale story' a little closer!
When the scribes and pharisees demanded that Jesus show them a sign to prove he was the Christ, Jesus said, 'For as Jonas was three days and nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.' (Matt. 12:40)
He also said;'An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas.' (Matt.12:39)
So Jesus himself points to the story of Jonah as an important sign demonstrating the authenticity of his ministry. What is he pointing to? To the fact that as the Christ and Saviour he, Jesus, will have to die. He will die and then remain in the grave for three days and three nights.
Some people think that Jonah never died when he entered the whale's belly, but the text clearly states that he did. The same was true of Jesus.
'Out of the belly of hell (sheol) cried I' (Jonah 2:2)
Sheol is the place where the souls of the dead descend.
'For thou wilt not leave my soul in sheol; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.' (Psalm 16:10)
Like Jonah, the soul of Jesus descended into sheol.
This is confirmed in Ephesians 8:9, 10 where it says,'Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended above all heavens, that he might fill all things.' (Ephesians 4:8,9)
We are told that Christ preached to the departed souls so that his word might fill all things.
Jesus says these things to the Pharisees whilst free and under no threat of crucifixion. To the likes of Outhouse, it is prophecies like this that should add credibility to both Jesus as a true prophet and the Bible as a true prophecy. A true prophet does not provide false information about future events.
When the scribes and pharisees demanded that Jesus show them a sign to prove he was the Christ, Jesus said, 'For as Jonas was three days and nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.' (Matt. 12:40)
Yes, he cried out from the GRAVE. This is sheol, where his soul resided in death. He was conscious in the grave. See Luke 16:19-29.
inChrist said:It does get tiresome to hear the claims about Jesus in India. I really appreciate this post of yours.