samtonga43
Well-Known Member
I look forward to reading the evidence which leads to your belief that Jesus' claim is propaganda.Sure start with I am the only way the truth and the life. no one comes to God except through me. Pure propaganda.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I look forward to reading the evidence which leads to your belief that Jesus' claim is propaganda.Sure start with I am the only way the truth and the life. no one comes to God except through me. Pure propaganda.
By all rights, you could test the ideas in the scriptures of other religions, not just the New Testament, and come up with the same outcome, so what does that tell you?
Now there is an interesting (and astonishing) response, Tb. I can’t imagine having faith in God without loving Him. How does that work?That is separate from faith. One can have faith without love.
Oh, it works, Tb. You too may see one day that it works... perfectly.No, Jesus is not God, only in your imagination is Jesus God. This is how Christians try to claim superiority over every other religion but it won’t work because Jesus is not God, and Jesus is not “better” than any other Manifestation of God.
I have better things to do, I looked at maybe ten minutes, and I would rather stick pins in my eyes than watch any more.Top 10 Reasons Why Jesus is not God
I see that no Trinitarians showed up to try to refute what was said in the video.
Really? Are you sure about this?No, people did not speak that way, but Baha’u’llah was not a person.
So Jesus cannot be a 'manifestation of God', since He spoke the language of the marketplace. Isn’t this what I’ve been telling you, Tb? Time to connect the dots.He was a Manifestation of God, and they tend to speak differently than ordinary people.
No. ONE BEING; THREE PERSONSThe Holy Spirit is not a person so it did not have a ministry. Jesus was a person who had a ministry. The Holy Spirit was the Bounty of God that was sent to Jesus by God and Jesus brought the Holy Spirit to humanity. The Holy Spirit was sent again when God sent it to Baha’u’llah in the Black Pit prison.
B. was just a man who lived under the delusion that he was something he was not. There are thousands, if not millions of people like this.Baha’u’llah was the Spirit of Truth as written in Acts 2. Acts 2:17-21 was spoken by the prophet Joel, and it was a prophecy that referred to the last days, the days when Christ would return.
The Holy Spirit is the Third Person of the Trinity. Wait!! Please tell me you’re not thinking of the word ‘Person’ (as in Triune God) as you think of a human ’person’. Surely not!!The Holy Spirit might guide us in our everyday lives but it does not do the following things that are in John 14, 15 and 16; only a person could do those things. The Holy Spirit is not a person, it is a Spirit! That is why it is called the Holy Spirit.
I have better things to do, I looked at maybe ten minutes, and I would rather stick pins in my eyes than watch any more.Top 10 Reasons Why Jesus is not God
I see that no Trinitarians showed up to try to refute what was said in the video.
Really? Are you sure about this?No, people did not speak that way, but Baha’u’llah was not a person.
So Jesus cannot be a manifestation of God, since He spoke the language of the marketplace. Isn’t this what I’ve been telling you, Tb? Time to connect the dots.He was a Manifestation of God, and they tend to speak differently than ordinary people.
I was also a nonbeliever before I became a Baha'i. I was not raised in any religion and my parents had both dropped out of their respective churches (my father was raised Anglican and my mother Greek orthodox).I was also an atheist, and as an atheist I looked into each of the world religions and I found them all to be strangely interesting but easily dismissed as wishful thinking, myth, irrational etc.
Forward several years, and I had become involved with a University atheist group. I re-read the Bible in order to arm myself with the facts needed to discuss theology with Christians.
As I was reading, something remarkable happened. I very slowly began to see, as I read on, and on and on, that what I had dismissed as nonsense, was now imbued with a sense of Truth.
The very last thing I wanted was to experience this volte-face, and I fought against it all the way, before I submitted.
There was no moment of “Hallelujah, I am saved!!” Rather, it was a long process of being drawn (unwillingly at times) to the Son by the Father.
Everything turned upside down. My life changed. I cannot say that it was easier, that problems were erased, that doubts fled, but I can say that the Truth set me free.
It was my first experience of the active Presence of the Holy Spirit.
You cannot imagine it because you are not me. A person can have faith that God exists and is there for them without loving God or feeling love from God. This thing about needing love from God is a Christian thing; although all Baha’is I know love God, they do not love God becaue they “need” God’s love. They love God because Baha’u’llah wrote that God loves us and that we should love God. For example:Now there is an interesting (and astonishing) response, Tb. I can’t imagine having faith in God without loving Him. How does that work?
I am 100% certain that Baha’u’llah was a Manifestation of God, just as I am certain that Jesus was a Manifestation of God, which is not a person.Trailblazer said: No, people did not speak that way, but Baha’u’llah was not a person.
Really? Are you sure about this?
That’s right, because them you might have to face the fact that Jesus is not God, a fact that you choose to ignore even though Jesus Himself made it abundantly clear. You do not want to know the truth; you just want to keep on believing what you believe because it is comfortable for you.I have better things to do, I looked at maybe ten minutes, and I would rather stick pins in my eyes than watch any more.
I never said that, and besides, Jesus did speak differently than ordinary people. Jesus spoke in parables, and that is because that is what people needed at that time because that is what the people Jesus spoke to were able to understand. I love Jesus’ parables but we no longer need parables to understand spiritual truths and that is why Baha’u’llah usually spoke directly, just as Jesus promised the Comforter/Spirit of truth would do when He came.Trailblazer said: He was a Manifestation of God, and they tend to speak differently than ordinary people.
So Jesus cannot be a 'manifestation of God', since He spoke the language of the marketplace. Isn’t this what I’ve been telling you, Tb? Time to connect the dots.
We know that the Christian Trinity is not true because we know that Jesus is not God for all the logical and scriptural reasons given in that video you don’t have time to watch.No. ONE BEING; THREE PERSONS
Jesus was also just a man, not God. The Christians tried to make Jesus into God at the Council of Nicaea and you bought off on the lie. Jesus was a Manifestation of God, not God incarnate. God cannot become flesh and die on the cross.B. was just a man who lived under the delusion that he was something he was not. There are thousands, if not millions of people like this.
The website got this right:We are definitely living in the last days. And yet the last day has not come. The last days refers to the period of time we are now in—between Christ’s death/resurrection/ascension and his second appearing or return. This is also called “the last time/s” (Jude 1:18; 1 Pet. 1:20) or “the last hour” (1 John 2:18) or “the end of the ages” (1 Cor. 10:11).
See more here:
Yes, We Really Are Living in the Last Days
I look forward to reading the evidence which leads to your belief that Jesus' claim is propaganda.
One thing we do know, John 14:6 was not written by Jesus.You can't even produce evidence Jesus existed, period! If he never existed obviously his claim "I am the only way to God" was written by churchmen to lure pagans into the religion. Pure insidious evil.
He, Dr. Carrier, and 50 respected CHRISTIAN Biblical scholars of the Jesus Seminar.I have been reading Ehrman for years and I agree that he is highly respected in his field. Does this mean I ought to believe everything he says, and agree with his every conclusion? Are you really saying that the Gospels are not reliable because Ehrman says so?
Have you read anyone else on this subject?
Why do Christians think it's rational and non-Christians think it's irrational?If it is true, and I believe it is true, can it be irrational? Is your definition of 'irrational' something you do not believe to be true?
I was just about to give you an Informative when I realized that I already knew that.He, Dr. Carrier, and 50 respected CHRISTIAN Biblical scholars of the Jesus Seminar.
According to the Seminar, Jesus was a mortal man born of two human parents, who did NOT perform nature miracles nor die as a substitute for sinners nor rise bodily from the dead.[4][5][6]
Jesus Seminar - Wikipedia
But I do not believe that Jesus was a sham. Rather I would say that certain Christian beliefs are a sham.Conclusion: Jesus was a sham.
But he existed.
Here's how the Jesus seminar described Jesus:I was just about to give you an Informative when I realized that I already knew that.
Jesus did NOT perform nature miracles nor die as a substitute for sinners nor rise bodily from the dead.
But I do not believe that Jesus was a sham. Rather I would say that certain Christian beliefs are a sham.
Poor Jesus, he would be aghast at what Christians believe about him, but it is not his fault. You can blame the Church and Paul for that.
How Paul changed the course of Christianity
Well, I think He said that, probably, but all Manifestations of are in a sense one person, as they reflect the same God.One thing we do know, John 14:6 was not written by Jesus.
As such, for Christians to try to use it to claim superiority over all the other religions is a Hail Mary.
Why do you think Jesus said that? How could we ever know if He did, passed down by oral tradition decades after He "might" have said it?Well, I think He said that, probably, but all Manifestations of are in a sense one person, as they reflect the same God.
Well, I think He said that, probably, but all Manifestations of are in a sense one person, as they reflect the same God.
Bart Ehrman can produce evidence that Jesus existed. Haven't you read his famous book "Did Jesus Exist?" He vigorously defended the historical Jesus. You ought to read it!You can't even produce evidence Jesus existed, period! If he never existed obviously his claim "I am the only way to God" was written by churchmen to lure pagans into the religion. Pure insidious evil.
You are so funny, SAT! Half a brain? Do some research. Start with John Polkinghorne, John Lennox, Alister McGrath, Francis Collins...And here is the core of the problem with Christianity: since we have absolutely no evidence Jesus the son of died lived (as opposed to a historical anonymous sage of some kind around which mythical stores were built) and we have no writings from him and absolutely no testimony from any first-hand witnesses who recorded their own accounts of Jesus or any historical evidence of any kind, Christians are free to say, "I think this about Jesus" and "I think that about Jesus" and these are nothing but opinions without any foundation. Much of what is attributed to Jesus in the gospels was written by Greeks who lived up to a century after the crucifixion and in all likelihood never talked to witnesses--assuming any would still be alive a century later. The whole premise is so nebulous and half-baked that it's impossible for a rational person with half a brain to even consider any of this is factual.
Oral testimony is very important in all historical topics, not just in Biblical testimony. See here:Why do you think Jesus said that? How could we ever know if He did, passed down by oral tradition decades after He "might" have said it?
You are so funny, SAT! Half a brain? Do some research. Start with John Polkinghorne, John Lennox, Alister McGrath, Francis Collins...
When you've done this I'll point you to many more Christians with a lot more than 'half a brain'. You are doing yourself no favours, SAT.
Yes indeed, oral testimony was very important back in the days of Jesus, but it was no longer necessary by the time we got to the 19th century, because we have the original writings of the Bab and Baha'u'llah penned in their own hands and we also had people who lived during the 19th century who knew the Bab and Baha'ullah and chronicled their lives.Oral testimony is very important in all historical topics, not just in Biblical testimony. See here:
The Story Of The Storytellers - Importance Of The Oral Tradition | From Jesus To Christ | FRONTLINE | PBS
So, according to SAT, the people I mentioned -- scientists, mathematicians, theologians, philosophers each have only half a brain.I mis-worded. I should have said, "It's impossible for anyone with half a brain..."