Ellen Brown
Well-Known Member
Is he human, though?
Perhaps God, Jesus, the Angels, and many others are beings of the Universe, with God being the leader?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is he human, though?
Human and God, apparently. Genes from Mary and genes from God the Father.Is he human, though?
Perhaps God, Jesus, the Angels, and many others are beings of the Universe, with God being the leader?
I was reading another thread, and this question came to mind.
If jesus father isn't biological (virgin birth), he wouldn't have paternal genes. How does that work? Can one human be the only human within the last three thousand years to have no paternal genes as the rest of us do?
I'm not a gene specialist. Just wondering.
Perhaps, lolPerhaps God, Jesus, the Angels, and many others are beings of the Universe, with God being the leader?
Also, think I found the right combo:
I don't see any reason why Jesus would not have genes, since the creator of the genes is the one giving Jesus his body and life.I was reading another thread, and this question came to mind.
If jesus father isn't biological (virgin birth), he wouldn't have paternal genes. How does that work? Can one human be the only human within the last three thousand years to have no paternal genes as the rest of us do?
I'm not a gene specialist. Just wondering.
I don't see any reason why Jesus would not have genes, since the creator of the genes is the one giving Jesus his body and life.
I dont know. If you shifted all three to the 21st century, would we still think the same?
But, Im serious. The laws of genetics doesnt change so drastically that a person can have no male DNA Chrom. before The Church but then its medically impossible years later.
Unless angels work by era, is jesus human? I cant find any conditions to where one can be born without any male (or female) chromosones. B.C. A.D. doesnt matter the time period. Humans are humans.
Don't humans perform with ease, artificial insemination? How much more easy for the creator of life.Thank you. What genes would he have with the mother's genes?
Jesus wouldnt need a Y gene, according to scripture, because he had no children of his own... so no one continued his gene line. But the idea is if you are born of someone, you have the genes of the parents to whom you were born.
How (and when) did that shift in time to where no one can be born without the Y chromose gene?
I mean, I tried looking it up but I havent found a condition for that. I honestly dont agree time gaps can make one event a godly event but if that event happened today, we would call it a myth.
Don't humans perform with ease, artificial insemination? How much more easy for the creator of life.
What answer are you looking for?But Im asking about the genes not the virgin birth. It would make sense if there were no virgin birth. Jesus would still be special with or without a biological father. Since he didnt have a biological father, where did he get his Y chromones from?
I was reading another thread, and this question came to mind.
If jesus father isn't biological (virgin birth), he wouldn't have paternal genes. How does that work? Can one human be the only human within the last three thousand years to have no paternal genes as the rest of us do?
I'm not a gene specialist. Just wondering.
That is supposed to happen in mice.Parthenogenesis occurs more often in lower species (typically amphibians and reptiles), but so far just the once (that we're aware of) in humans. The miracle isn't so much the development of an unfertilized egg--the miracle is that an individual who would necessarily have two X chromosomes developed as a male!
I was reading another thread, and this question came to mind.
If jesus father isn't biological (virgin birth), he wouldn't have paternal genes. How does that work? Can one human be the only human within the last three thousand years to have no paternal genes as the rest of us do?
I'm not a gene specialist. Just wondering.
What it means is, that Jesus has no earthly father. As we have.
So the genes of Jesus can not be trace or by a DNA test, to any human father.
I was reading another thread, and this question came to mind.
If jesus father isn't biological (virgin birth), he wouldn't have paternal genes. How does that work? Can one human be the only human within the last three thousand years to have no paternal genes as the rest of us do?
I'm not a gene specialist. Just wondering.
That figures
How about to a mother, any genes to test?
What answer are you looking for?
What it means is, that Jesus has no earthly father. As we have.
So the genes of Jesus can not be trace or by a DNA test, to any human father.