wellwisher
Well-Known Member
The problem is science is like a large ship that takes a long time to turn. As new discoveries appear, like galaxies forming very fast in the early universe, obsolete theory will linger for some time, due to the long slow turn of the ship of science, even after the wheel is turned for course correction by new discoveries.The Old becomes dogma, until the turn is complete.yes, now, galaxies, much old than we thought is being found in what we called dark spots, or area in the known universe, but these new finding puts a crimp in these old theories as how the universe came about. bottom line science just doesn't know.
these galaxies being found by the red shift in the spectrum of longer wavelengths, vs the Blue shift, have scientist now scratching their heads.
next it will be their feet until it gets to their backsides. ....... before it finally gets to their heads.
101G
This is less due to science and scientists but more due to the bureaucracy of science. Science does not have its own resources. It is dependent on others to get funding; government, industry and private donations. Budgets by those who give are often planned over years and decades, and the research will run its course until the money runs out. The ship stays on course even if the course is no longer correct and/or you need to turn. That is why it is easier to do science on your own, since an individual can turn on a dime, if needed. But on your own, one lacks all the extra resources the big ship can bring.
One of my theories solved the fast galaxy formation problem. I presented it in science forums, a decade ago, but it was seen as crazy and not needed. Now that this new data has appeared; synchronicity, the old way now seems weak. The slow turn is now in affect but schools will still be taught obsolete, as though these are dogma, since the ship of science cannot turn on a dime.
The BB Model currently assumes an atomization and expansion and progression of space-time and matter, that then is acted upon by gravity to form stars and galaxies. The conceptual problem with this is, going from a singularity to umpteen particles represents a huge increase in complexity; extreme increase in entropy. Since an entropy increase is endothermic; absorbs free energy, the free energy of the original BB would drop drastically. This could lead to too little energy to expand as fast as it did; inflation.
To overcome this entropy based free energy bottleneck, I developed a different scenario, where the entropy change is much lower, allowing more energy left over to do other things, like expand. In this scenario, the primordial atom of the BB does not atomize/expand with space-time, but simply splits like a mother cell into two daughter cells. This will also increase entropy, but not much, compared to the current scenario, allowing most of the free energy to be left over.
These two daughter cells also spilt, etc., etc, until the cells reach the lowest level cell size; galaxy level cells. Next, all the cells of the cluster, do a much smaller or galaxy scale version of the BB; mini BB phase. The powerful energy wave fronts from all the expanding galaxy level cells, cause the universe to expand relative to the galaxies. While the cells in the middle, will see powerful energy wave fronts, coming in from all directions, keeping these galaxies compact, for rapid galaxy and star formation.
Our universe shows superstructure; embryonic body of the universe that formed from its many cells. These cells, before the mini-BB expansion, would be similar to a cluster of galaxy scale black holes, due to their huge density. Their frames of reference would very close to that of the speed of light reference, where any size universe would appears very contracted in their reference. Small changes in their reference; spacing, would reflect huge distances in our earth reference frame. Conceptually the universe could be laid out in the dark, ready to come into existence in our reference; dark to light or black holes to white holes. This also explains why galaxies still have huge central black holes.
Last edited: