I didn't ask you that. I asked how, exactly, the Jesus of Matthew and the Jesus of Luke (the only two virgin versions) acquired their Y-chromosome. Mary's ovum had to be fertilized in a manner her evolved Homo sapiens body could cope with and react to, so any alien influences would need to be minimized.Jesus is the eternally preexistent SON of God who took the form of man:
That of course is not Jesus saying "I am God" ─ nor would he, considering the number of times John's Jesus made it clear that he was NOT God, more emphatic about it than the other versions of Jesus, and they each made it clear enough.Jesus says, "I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father" (John 16: 28-33)
Sure, the "Kenosis hymn". That 'robbery' as a translation of Philippians 2:6 ─"Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men".
2:6 ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ
is colorful, but the TR text says nothing of the kind, as you can see.An early form of Obamacare or National Health, you say? Very thoughtful.Everything Mary needed to give birth to a son was provided at the moment of the Son's incarnation. Nothing else needed to be provided.
I'm simply telling you what the NT says ─ that there are five versions of Jesus in the NT and they have irreconcilable differences. I assume you live in a free country where you're free to rewrite documents out of copyright any way that pleases you, so go ahead, however pleases you.There is one Jesus, one body, one Savior. Any other Jesus claiming to be the only begotten Son of God is a false Jesus. This idea of the apostles attesting to several different Jesuses is certainly interesting, but incorrect.
Cheap shot unless you provide specifics, I'd say.I don't see where anything I've said conflicts with the NT, but I must say I see quite a bit of what you posted here that does.
But at least it accords with NT, as I've pointed out. Jesus has to wait till the 4th century to become Triune, which as we seem to agree is an incoherent way to be,I did not present the premise "Jesus is Not God". That's in the title line of the OP, and it's not evidenced. I think a proffered premise, as a bare minimum, needs at least a modicum of support before requiring the world to rush out and rebut it.
You refresh your knowledge of the EM spectrum eg via Wikipedia >Electromagnetic spectrum - Wikipedia<. You take this unfortunate blind person to a source of heat, perhaps a stove top. You help the person (safely) feel the heat. You then explain that you can detect heat, just as the eye can detect other frequencies of the EM spectrum.When someone, blind from birth, stands up and announces there is no color red, the onus is on that blind person to show that red does not exist.
But the solution is as above, so that's not a problem.The onus does not shift to the world to prove the color red exists, no matter how much the blind man wishes to see it.
The converse is also true. If I had created an OP that Jesus IS God, the onus would be on me to evidence the same. All I ask is that you hold yourself to the same standard of evidence that you would demand of me if our roles were reversed:
Show us where Jesus says: "I am not God".
Goodness, didn't you read all the quotes I've referred you to again and again?
For example, Paul in 1 Corinthians 8: 6
yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.
Note how there's only one God and it isn't Jesus.Or what about Mark?
Mark 9 : 36 And he took a child, and put him in the midst of them; and taking him in his arms, he said to them, 37 “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me; and whoever receives me, receives not me but him who sent me.
You haven't worked out who "him who sent me" is? If not, just say so and I'll explain it to you.
Or Matthew 20:23?
23 He said to them, “You will drink my cup, but to sit at my right hand and at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.”
So Jesus is God but there are things God can do and Jesus can't? Do you not see a problem here?
Or Luke 18:18
And a ruler asked him, “Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” 19 And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.”
You're saying that Jesus is being deceitful here, pretending not be God?
Or John 5:30
“I can do nothing on my own authority; as I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just, because I seek not my own will but the will of him who sent me.”
So Jesus has no authority but he's still God, you say? Really?
Or John 17:3
“And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.”
Does that not appear to you to be a perfectly clear statement that Jesus is Jesus and God is someone else altogether?
Or John 20:17
“I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.”
You think Jesus is like Donald Trump or Elon Musk, worshiping himself?
And as Eli G noted recently, Acts 3:13
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified His servant Jesus, the one whom you handed over and disowned in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release Him. (...)
26 God raised up His Servant for you first, and sent Him to bless you by turning every one of you from your wicked ways.
26 God raised up His Servant for you first, and sent Him to bless you by turning every one of you from your wicked ways.
Do you say Jesus is both the servant of the God of Abraham, and the God of Abraham at the same time? The God of Abraham never renounced [his] covenant of circumcision, for instance, and when Paul did that, Paul created a new God, different to the God of the Tanakh's covenant.
As I said earlier, nowhere in the NT does any version of Jesus say "I am God". Not even once.
If the Jesus of the NT was indeed God, contrary to his repeated denials, then his entire mission was a creepy deceit and lie. And it was very silly of him to pray to himself instead of simply effecting any wishes he might have had ─ and of course it's inexplicable how the Jesus of Mark and the Jesus of Matthew might cry out on the cross, "Me, me, why have I forsaken me?" and how all four gospel versions of Jesus didn't pray in the garden, "If it be my will, let this cup pass from me."
Last edited: