Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's one view established from Paul's "mission." But Jesus, a devout Jew, never claimed to be the expected, promised Messiah of the Hebrew people. The Messiah is to bring peace and he specifically said “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword." (Mt 10:34) And in fact, as per prophecy, he did not initiate the Messianic Age of peace; life and times became much more violent and destructive.Notice that Judaism has been consistently rejecting Jesus for 2000 years while it was the Roman’s who adopted him. Ironically, The reasons that they reject Jesus today are still the same as the Jews of the Gospels who rejected him then!
Thats your opinion but one has to throw out quite a lot of the NT to arrive at it.That's one view established from Paul's "mission." But Jesus, a devout Jew, never claimed to be the expected, promised Messiah of the Hebrew people. The Messiah is to bring peace and he specifically said “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword." (Mt 10:34) And in fact, as per prophecy, he did not initiate the Messianic Age of peace; life and times became much more violent and destructive.
The majority of the followers of Judaism saw he was a Rabbi preaching caution, calm, and to prepare endurance for troubled days ahead. . .which did occur. They did not reject the "real" Jesus. They rejected the falsehood said of him.
Rome did not adopt Jesus. What was adopted was a mix of Judaism with Paganism under the direction of Paul. What I can be grateful for in Paul is his persistent to spread whatever necessary (1 Cor. 9) in order to keep the name of Jesus alive and active in our minds. I have no doubt many have grown closer to God because of him. He indeed helped Peter build the church of Jesus's message. Otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion and sharing of theological thought now.
Strange you would think it was an apple she ate.For the Jewish adherents
Was Eve a real person? Was she actually unaware of morality prior to eating the apple? And if so, how could she sin prior to having an understanding of sin?
If you're speaking of Paul's part, written by him or a colleague, indeed you do. About 80%. That kind of makes it hard to believe in as a Christian scripture, doesn't it?Thats your opinion but one has to throw out quite a lot of the NT to arrive at it.
Im speaking about the Gospels where Jesus is quoted as well the harassment by the Jews, trial, crucifixion and return from the death of his body.If you're speaking of Paul's part, written by him or a colleague, indeed you do. About 80%. That kind of makes it hard to believe in as a Christian scripture, doesn't it?
And that circles back to my original point in this discussion -- it wasn't "the Jews" that harassed and crucified Jesus. It was the Jewish, political leadership of the Sanhedrin, not all of the council, namely Caiaphas and a few supporters, that condemned him for blasphemy and sent him to Pilate to be dealt with.Im speaking about the Gospels where Jesus is quoted as well the harassment by the Jews, trial, crucifixion and return from the death of his body.
You said.....""blame it on the Jews" theory was the safest way in the political climate of the Jewish Wars to speak of who instigated the arrest and crucifixion. "And that circles back to my original point in this discussion -- it wasn't "the Jews" that harassed and crucified Jesus. It was the Jewish, political leadership of the Sanhedrin, not all of the council, namely Caiaphas and a few supporters, that condemned him for blasphemy and sent him to Pilate to be dealt with.
I think he was a troublemaker. He literally went into the Temple during a time when gazillions of pilgrims were flooding Jerusalem and the Romans were struggling to ensure a peaceful holiday, and vandalized it (overturning the tables) and assaulted the priests (driving them out with a whip). That alone could have him crucified. His claim to be the King of the Jews, which is ambiguous at best, simply added fuel to the fire. No, I don't think he was a genuine threat, but I'm sure the Romans didn't see it that way.Do you think that what he did/say threatened the Roman sovereignty?
The Temple authorities had established a lucrative commercial enterprise in the Gods house! It may as well have been Joel Olstein's mega church! Jesus was disgusted by that! He went in and rightly drove out the profiteers!I think he was a troublemaker. He literally went into the Temple during a time when gazillions of pilgrims were flooding Jerusalem and the Romans were struggling to ensure a peaceful holiday, and vandalized it (overturning the tables) and assaulted the priests (driving them out with a whip). That alone could have him crucified. His claim to be the King of the Jews, which is ambiguous at best, simply added fuel to the fire. No, I don't think he was a genuine threat, but I'm sure the Romans didn't see it that way.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with buying and selling in a place of worship. My synagogue has a Judaica shop, where we can purchase things like shabbat candle holders, menorahs for Chanukah, tallitot, mezuzas, etc. It is an enormous CONVENIENCE.The Temple authorities had established a lucrative commercial enterprise in the Gods house! It may as well have been Joel Olstein's mega church! Jesus was disgusted by that! He went in and rightly drove out the profiteers!
Yes, it was. I also said those working underhanded were still at it. Even in the second century and beyond, it was "safer" to point the finger at the Jewish masses than at the Sanhedrin leadership in cahoots with the Romans. The Hellenists authors of the NT books certainly used this tactic -- blame it on the people. Anti-sematism flourished as fed by Scripture until someone along the way over compensated with the "protect Israel" mandate in Christianity.You said.....""blame it on the Jews" theory was the safest way in the political climate of the Jewish Wars to speak of who instigated the arrest and crucifixion. "
I would love to see the requirments if that is possible in any way.I took a 3-evening seminar through a Christian theologian [Presbyterian] who concluded Jesus could not now be the messiah as not all the requirements have been fulfilled. However, he does believe it's likely that Jesus will be the messiah with his second coming.
Are you under the impression that there is anything but a story,?Strange you would think it was an apple she ate.
For example:I would love to see the requirments if that is possible in any way.
Oh, your justification for killing Jesus was that the Temple simply had a little gift shop where they sold scented candles, key chains and bumper stickers! Mean old Jesus went in there an vandalized the place!There is absolutely nothing wrong with buying and selling in a place of worship. My synagogue has a Judaica shop, where we can purchase things like shabbat candle holders, menorahs for Chanukah, tallitot, mezuzas, etc. It is an enormous CONVENIENCE.
The business that took place in the Jewish Temple was similarly providing an incredible convenience. For one, instead of driving your animal for sacrifice all the way from your remote farm to the temple, you could sell your animal before you left and use the money to purchase an animal right there in Jerusalem. Secondly, Jews from all over the Roman empire would come to Jerusalem, and needed to exchange their foreign currency for shekels. Again, an ENORMOUS convenience, and absolutely nothing wrong with it.
Some Christian churches will sell books and CDs in their lobbies. How is this any different?
The problem with Joel Osteen is that he is committing FRAUD. He is telling people that if they give money to him, that God will bless them with even greater wealth. THAT IS A LIE that is meant to increase his own personal wealth.
No one in the Temple was lying to Jews telling them that if they do business in the Temple, that God will make them rich.
I don’t see “the Jewish people” being blamed in the Gospels. The powerful representatives of the institution of Judaism were at odds with the teachings of Jesus, his theology and references to his identity. They had the Roman’s kill him because they weren’t allowed to execute him themselves. But it is an undeniable fact that 99% of Judaism and Jews have consistently rejected Jesus to this day.Yes, it was. I also said those working underhanded were still at it. Even in the second century and beyond, it was "safer" to point the finger at the Jewish masses than at the Sanhedrin leadership in cahoots with the Romans. The Hellenists authors of the NT books certainly used this tactic -- blame it on the people. Anti-sematism flourished as fed by Scripture until someone along the way over compensated with the "protect Israel" mandate in Christianity.
It's difficult at times to sift out the politics even in a time and place that stands for separation of church and state.
I would love to see the requirments if that is possible in any way.