Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am almost afraid to ask, what in your definition of "temple judaism" vs "non-temple" judaism?Rabbinic Judaism is the term to distinguish Temple Judaism from non-Temple Judaism.
And it makes sense. There is also nothing bad about it because Rabbinic Judaism kept/keeps us together in exile, something Temple-era Judaism couldnt/cant.
As typical with so many discussions, a lot depends on how one defines terms used? Frankly, since all current branches have rabbis, or variations of the word, then all branches are examples of "rabbinic Judaism". If one wants to qualify that term so as to make a distinction of one type or another, then they need to explain how they're using their terminology.
Shabbat shalom
One reason to refer to Judaism today as rabbinic Judaism is Baba Metzia 59b - the oven at Aknai.
Peter
Judaism is based on the Torah not the rabbis.
Therefore it's Torah Judaism or G-D Judaism.
It's not based on rabbis but G-d.
One reason to refer to Judaism today as rabbinic Judaism is Baba Metzia 59b - the oven at Aknai.
Peter
Peter, just had to have a separate post to say Shabbat shalom to you and yours as we've not had that much of a chance to talk to one another. Hope all is well, and...
Gut Shabbos, my friend.
Vern
Not necessarily.You just made a great point. Can't believe I didn't think of this as an example when I was debating it with CMike. But the problem CMike is having, is that Rabbinic Judaism means a different thing to him. For some reason, he believes "Rabbinic Judaism" means to suggest that Judaism is given to us from the Rabbis rather than God, which is not the case.
Rabbinic Judaism only suggests that the Torah is to be taught and interpreted by the rabbis.
Bava Batra makes it certainly seem a lot more difficult than you do.Not necessarily.
Not all the the Torah laws need the rabbis to teach and interpret.
Do you need the rabbis to teach you what do not steal mean means?
You know, without rabbis that the law applies to women and not to men? Do you know the exact definition of adultery without rabbis? I doubt it.Do you need the rabbis to tell you what do not committ adulterly means?
Masekhet Avoda Zara seems to think so.Do you need the rabbis to tell you what do not make a graven image means?
Do you need the rabbis to tell you what don't worship ideal mean?
So you obviously see no issue in eating chicken cheese burgers, right?Do you need the rabbis to tell you what eating kosher means? It's right there in the Torah.
You're making things seen simpler than they really are.The Torah says keep the sabbath. When sabbath starts exactly is figured out by the rabbis. But the sabbath is part of G-D Judaism, not rabbinic judaism.
whose definition? Yours? Mine means that Judaism is taught by rabbis."Rabbinic Judaism" by definition means Judaism comes from the rabbis. That is not the case.
I challenge you to find one halakha that is so straightforward and lacks all murkiness, that no rabbi ever has felt the need to comment on it.The rabbis are needed when there is murkiness to clarify.
agreed. Find me one mishna that hasn't been commented on because of its simplicity.The oral law comes from G-D too, not the rabbis.
There is sizable group who state that orthodox judaism is simply made up by the rabbis.
I challenge you to find one halacha that is made up solely by the rabbis and has no basis from the Torah? If you can't than it's not "Rabbinic Judaism", it's "Torah Judaism".
Why would you put the basis of jewish on rabbis and not on G-D?
I understand not to idol worship pretty well. I don't need rabbis to define it to understand it.
I think do not steal is pretty clear. You don't?
It kind of reminds me of Christianity. Christianity by definition makes it's religion centered on Jesus, and not G-D.
"Rabbinic Judaism" by definition makes it's religion centered on rabbis, and not G-D.
It see it as an extremely important distinction.
It doesn't matter if the rabbis comment on various laws or not. The religion isn't about them. It's about G-D.
The center is G-D.
Therefore it's either G-D's judaism or Torah Judaism, in no way should it be calle "rabbinic judaism".
I challenge you to find one halacha that is made up solely by the rabbis and has no basis from the Torah? If you can't than it's not "Rabbinic Judaism", it's "Torah Judaism".
Why would you put the basis of jewish on rabbis and not on G-D?
I understand not to idol worship pretty well. I don't need rabbis to define it to understand it.
I think do not steal is pretty clear. You don't?
It kind of reminds me of Christianity. Christianity by definition makes it's religion centered on Jesus, and not G-D.
"Rabbinic Judaism" by definition makes it's religion centered on rabbis, and not G-D.
It see it as an extremely important distinction.
It doesn't matter if the rabbis comment on various laws or not. The religion isn't about them. It's about G-D.
The center is G-D.
Therefore it's either G-D's judaism or Torah Judaism, in no way should it be calle "rabbinic judaism".
Where in the term "rabbinic judaism" does it say it's from G-D?Again, I never said anything about Judaism being the rabbi's rather than God's.
I repeat. Judaism comes from God. Rabbinic Judaism simply means that this God given religion, is interpreted and explained to us by Rabbis.