Maybe you could just answer the question. If you think an ant or a tree is so complex that some creator god must have had a hand in it, it's only logical to ask how vastly much more complex this god you believe in must be than a simple tree or a duck.
Since the creator is more than all of his creation combined, he is certainly nothing you could ever describe.....nor can you rule out his existence because you don't have a clue what is "out there". Its the terminology you stumble over. The Creator and his attendants have been placed in the realm of myth and legend...something a scientific mind must reject at all costs. But what if the Creator and his assistants are living beings that share existence along with us, but on a much higher plane? What if we are ants in comparison to them? Are the smartest ants on Earth in a position to doubt that they are the product of a higher power? Can't mere humans alter the genetics of lower creatures? Can't selective breeding produce an animals that are more beneficial or aesthetically pleasing to humans? e.g. horse/donkey....dog and cat breeds? Not accidental, but intelligently planned.
Facts are certainties, not suggestions. Facts don't change on a whim.I didn't say anything about certainty.
By the way, I know this has been pointed out to you before ... Evolution isn't merely "random chance," because natural selection is not random.
If I gave you 20 cupcakes that all looked delicious but different, and I told you that you can only choose 4, on what basis would you 'select' them?
You have 5 senses to help you determine your choice. These 5 sense are coordinated and processed by an intelligent brain and selection is made by cognitive means.
Out of the genetic material from which all living things are made, how is "selection" made without any intellect guiding the choices?
Genetic mutations are randomly produced. They are not planned. They usually result in a defect, not an enhancement. Beneficial mutations are so rare that they almost never happen.
Natural selection explains only survival of the fittest....it fails to explain how life began. But which of the two questions is the most pressing? How did life begin?...or how did it change over time?
Isn't it the one that tells you how life came into existence....because then you will know why things changed and to what extent and reason the Creator made those changes possible. Human guesswork, designed to eliminate ID could then be completely discounted. Problem solved...no ifs or buts and no suggestions needed.