Well then, just Probably, like his ability to translate anything, it is faulty. :yes: TY!
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Justify creationism over evolutionism
- Thread starter whitworth77
- Start date
Well then, just Probably, like his ability to translate anything, it is faulty. :yes: TY!
I noticed the sarcasm, I think it's your inability to recognize sarcasm to further boast your religious agenda.
Maybe I am just not good at reading charts. It did seem odd to begin with, so I allowed the last things he said in the chart to register only.
Sonic247
Well-Known Member
hahaha good one. Well if your toe talks to you that's personal business and say what you want about my intellect but leave my fingers out of this."Sure they do, it's just change over time. I can grow new cells with mutations."
That statement shows a profound and deep failure to understand what ToE says. I am willing to bet (you name the $) that you NEVER in your entire life not once ever held in your grubby gnarled fingers a copy of Darwin's Origins - much less read a single word.
You haven't even grasped the implications of PW's observation that populations evolve - not individuals. You are really arguing that acquired characteristics are inherited. A 19th century fallacy that Darwin exposed.
One could say you have no idea what you are talking about. But that would be undue charity.
Sonic247
Well-Known Member
Prove they came into existence by a mutation.
Can you suggest an alternative theory of where new genes come from?
So if I understand you, you are actually suggesting that there are no new genes.
Yes, but to be completely frank with you genetics is something I a struggling to understand myself, I really dont have the adequate expertise to explain it to you at this time. Hopefully someone with more understanding and eloquence will pick up on this.
Sonic247
Well-Known Member
Well if evolutionists are right they came from dinosaurs. I've never seen a lizard with feathers but oh well to each his own. I guess it's like a huge jigsaw puzzle, some pieces fit together and evolutionists hope to find other pieces to connect them all.
Last edited:
We all came from the same place, no matter what your idea is. To the most broadest sense we are all related in some way to every living thing on earth.
Sonic247
Well-Known Member
Well that's true. It's just that the places are on the opposite ends of the spectrum. Creationist believe the beginning is God who created everything which then gradually went down hill. Less species over time damaging mutation etc. On the other hand evolutionist's believe life started as very simple organisms and became more complex over time.
I'm aware of what creationists believe. Your last statement however, was spot on. Can you think of any natural causes that don't start from a simple beginning?
Any natural process. Child birth, trees, you name it.
Sonic247
Well-Known Member
Well I can't use those because I can't trace them back to the beginning. I know what your thinking; it starts with a small seed and becomes a big tree. The thing is though the seeds come from a big tree and it becomes the classic "what came first the chicken or the egg." (it's the chicken-the more complex)
No, I'm saying you tell me what doesn't start from simple beginnings through natural processes. I was just giving you an example of what I was referring to as natural.
A tree starts from simpler beginnings(acorns) and emerges into a more complex system, so, trees aren't an example of that at all. Trees evolve, yes, I said evolve. These are natural processes that we've come to know. You never see anything by natural processes just sprout into existence.