Justify creationism over evolutionism

[Father Heathen]

Athiest were indoctrinate to ignore God when it gets in the way of their sin.

You were indoctrinated to ignore God (Vishnu) when it gets in the way of your sin (of eating beef). You don't want to be reincarnated as a pin worm, do you? Repent before it's too late, son. And you're right, the world was created by God (Brahma), when he split the lotus flower (that grew from Vishnu's navel after he was awoken by the sound of Om) into three parts; the heavens, the skies and the earth.

Seriously, though. God and evolution are not mutually exclusive. The ONLY thing evolution is in conflict with is literal interpretations of creation myths.

 

[Sonic247]

I'm trying to find the process they used online.... be back later..

 

[darkendless]

Athiest were indoctrinate to ignore God when it gets in the way of their sin.

Haha oh come on, you can do better than that.

I was actually indoctrinated to be Christian, but then again, i can think for myself. You're showing us just how well indoctrinated you are with such comments.

 

[Sonic247]

Well I couldn't find the process so far. I'll admit it sounds interesting, but they still won't get very far. RNA is one thing DNA is another, and then it has to be something that could have happened outside a labratory. I guess time will tell, it's worse than alchemy to me. Gold and lead are closer than life and non-life. I'll keep looking.

 

[Sonic247]

Haha oh come on, you can do better than that.

I was actually indoctrinated to be Christian, but then again, i can think for myself. You're showing us just how well indoctrinated you are with such comments.

Well then I guess the first indoctrination didn't last.

 

[Tristesse]

Well I couldn't find the process so far. I'll admit it sounds interesting, but they still won't get very far. RNA is one thing DNA is another, and then it has to be something that could have happened outside a labratory. I guess time will tell, it's worse than alchemy to me. Gold and lead are closer than life and non-life. I'll keep looking.

Why is it your goal to undermined advancements in science? I swear if everyone had the same mentality that you have towards understanding, we'd probably still think the earth was flat.

 

[Tristesse]

The truth of the matter is, science is about understanding the universe to the best of our knowledge. Science doesn't have a hidden agenda to disprove claims about a god, contrary to what some people think. It's a process of bettering our understanding, nothing more.

 

[Sonic247]

So far, I'm still looking, the synthetic DNA is where I thought it would be from. According to the beginning of this video YouTube - Creating Synthetic DNA - Drew Endy it is taken from sugar cane, which is already alive. But even if they made it from something that wasn't alive they would have a long way to go.

Edit: Oh yeah did you see that machine that puts it together, I guess you can't just mix it in a bowl which would be more like how those chemicals would react in nature.

 

[Sonic247]

The truth of the matter is, science is about understanding the universe to the best of our knowledge. Science doesn't have a hidden agenda to disprove claims about a god, contrary to what some people think. It's a process of bettering our understanding, nothing more.

Science doesn't disprove God, it supports the fact that there is a creator.

 

[Sonic247]

Why is it your goal to undermined advancements in science? I swear if everyone had the same mentality that you have towards understanding, we'd probably still think the earth was flat.

I'm not against science as a whole. Things like alchemy, and spontanious generation used to be considered science and now they aren't. It's the same way with the belief that one celled critters became birds and whales and turkeys, especially turkeys.

 

[Father Heathen]

Tell us how the existence of God is dependent upon some ancient creation myth written by primitive man being true?

 

[Sonic247]

You were indoctrinated to ignore God (Vishnu) when it gets in the way of your sin (of eating beef). You don't want to be reincarnated as a pin worm, do you? Repent before it's too late, son. And you're right, the world was created by God (Brahma), when he split the lotus flower (that grew from Vishnu's navel after he was awoken by the sound of Om) into three parts; the heavens, the skies and the earth.

Seriously, though. God and evolution are not mutually exclusive. The ONLY thing evolution is in conflict with is literal interpretations of creation myths.

Actually I wouldn't mind coming back as a worm, no real resposibilities except to eat all day. Now I have to try and be temperate and work all the time.

 

[Tristesse]

Science doesn't disprove God, it supports the fact that there is a creator.

Did you read what I wrote? I didn't say science disproves god at all. And it doesn't prove god either.

 

[Sonic247]

Tell us how the existence of God is dependent upon some ancient creation myth written by primitive man being true?

It isn't, but it is true.

 

[Sonic247]

Did you read what I wrote? I didn't say science disproves god at all. And it doesn't prove god either.

That may be so, but you said I think that science has the agenda of disproving God. I actually see it the other way around.

 

[Tristesse]

I'm not against science as a whole. Things like alchemy, and spontanious generation used to be considered science and now they aren't. It's the same way with the belief that one celled critters became birds and whales and turkeys, especially turkeys.

Thats because science doesn't stop working. We discover more and more about the universe, things need to be re-branded, the more we learn. Just because we find one thing wrong or a couple things wrong in our understanding of what we once knew, doesn't mean the whole thing is to be thrown out.

 

[Father Heathen]

It isn't, but it is true.

Which one?

 

[Sonic247]

God being real doesn't depend on what they wrote, but what they wrote is true.

 

[Tristesse]

That may be so, but you said I think that science has the agenda of disproving God. I actually see it the other way around.

No, you obviously glazed over what I wrote. I said science DOESN'T have a hidden agenda to disprove a god. Nore does it have an agenda to prove god, science is completely neutral on the issue.

 

[Sonic247]

Thats because science doesn't stop working. We discover more and more about the universe, things need to be re-branded, the more we learn. Just because we find one thing wrong or a couple things wrong in our understanding of what we once knew, doesn't mean the whole thing is to be thrown out.

That's true I agree with that. But you can be driving down a street a long time before you realize it's a dead end. The Bible is like a sign that says "Dead End." (In this analogy anyway)