• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kansas Ends Bad Economic News by Not Reporting It

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I like this post. But you left small business of the list. They are also untrustworthy, just less capable of causing the end of civilization.
As a representative of small business (really small), I
believe that including me covered that demographic.

I can prove that I'm trustworthy though.
Send me $100,000, & I guarantee that
I'll return it to you.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
My experience dealing with small business is a LOT more positive than gigantic corporate bureaucracies.
I prefer small business too.
But some gigantic ones really step up & make me like them.....
etrailer, Amazon, Zoro

And some annoy me....
ebay, GE
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
All businesses/corporations - small or large, are untrustworthy and cause the decay of civilization.
Maybe I should tell my massage therapist who runs that business that she's untrustworthy and causing the decay of civilization. Or perhaps my dentist who employs a few people in his practice?
 

buddhist

Well-Known Member
Maybe I should tell my massage therapist who runs that business that she's untrustworthy and causing the decay of civilization. Or perhaps my dentist who employs a few people in his practice?
I'd have no problems if they were operating as sole proprietors, but I'm guessing they incorporated? If the latter is true, then my answer to your question is "Yes", on both counts.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
All businesses/corporations - small or large, are untrustworthy and cause the decay of civilization.
Civilizations seem prone to decay even when there are no corporations or businesses.
But I prefer that my decay include business.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
IMO not in this particular case. Haven't you ever asked yourself, why people incorporate, instead of forming sole proprietorships?

Sure. I was a small business owner.
So...wait...you think generalizations are generally overstated, APART from in this case????
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
IMO not in this particular case. Haven't you ever asked yourself, why people incorporate, instead of forming sole proprietorships?
There are good reasons....
- Better tax treatment in some business scenarios, eg, capital retention
- Insulation from legal liabilities, allowing investors to finance riskier ventures.
- Public funding
- More likely to survive exit of the prime mover
 

buddhist

Well-Known Member
There are good reasons....
- Better tax treatment in some business scenarios, eg, capital retention
- Insulation from legal liabilities, allowing investors to finance riskier ventures.
- Public funding
- More likely to survive exit of the prime mover
Do you see any negatives in all of the above?
 

buddhist

Well-Known Member
All have possible negative & positive outcomes.
But they're still good reasons to form corporations.
People form corporations because they're afraid of directly reaping the consequences if they do something wrong (aka "insulation from liabilities"), and they get advantages over other people (aka "better tax treatment"). Both are inherently destructive to society.

People need to reap the consequences of their actions, and to not have advantages over others.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
People form corporations because they're afraid of directly reaping the consequences if they do something wrong (aka "insulation from liabilities"), and they get advantages over other people (aka "better tax treatment"). Both are inherently destructive to society.

People need to reap the consequences of their actions, and to not have advantages over others.
They don't always get better tax treatment.
Often, this different treatment is to encourage reinvestment of profits.
Avoiding liability can be done for ill, but it can also serve good.
Corporations can be sanctioned for wrongful behavior without
making every stockholder liable for things beyond their control.

You say these are destructive things, but I find they make sense for
an economy. Where do you see a better system without corporations?
 
Top