exchemist
Veteran Member
Gospel has a modern meaning in English.What other meaning could euaggelizo have, other than that which the Bible gives us?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gospel has a modern meaning in English.What other meaning could euaggelizo have, other than that which the Bible gives us?
These two shall be one flesh. The woman Eve was taken from Adam's side. These were originally One flesh.The Revelation shows the bride as a separate human being... the 144k standing on Zion, which are the two witnesses of Judah and Israel. Psalm 45:9 says that the bride is the queen, standing next to the King who is obviously Jesus.
His sheep hear His voice, and will follow no one else.
Or fewer. Didn't Christ say there were really only two?
Gospel has a modern meaning in English.
And, like most of them, a disingenuous one.And what would that be? I have to confess that I am a literalist.
You say that His sheep hear His voice and don't follow another. That's true. But, Jesus said to His disciples "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come."
And, like most of them, a disingenuous one.
The laws are very ancient. If we go with Christian modern Bibles they begin not in Eden but on Mt. Sinai. Eden can be considered as part of the beginning of Israel, so possibly Eden is included but not in a timeline. If Eden exists before the experience at Sinai then no.The Kingdom Gospel is all about conditions, just as the Promise to Abraham had it's own conditions. Since Jesus tells us that the Father gave to Jesus those who belonged to God, doesn't that mean that the Law of Moses has continued from Eden through Matthew... and continues like skipping-stones, through the Revelation?
The Millennial Reign appears only in Revelation and should not be a lens for interpreting much. It should be taken in the traditional way. What we do know for sure is that it requires patience on the part of the saints. I do not take Revelation as a timetable or ordering if events at all.Since the Heaven and Earth have not passed away and will not do so until the Millennium of the Kingdom is finished, and since Jesus says that His words will never pass away... I find that the gospel of Paul is written exclusively for the gentiles.
I think that is probably close to the model. Paul says the circumcision are entrusted with the 'Oracles of God' which could refer to Torah or oral Torah. He seems to think that the church requires their input to function.Because according to Jesus, not one word of the Law is removed from His Kingdom Gospel, making His Gospel the gospel to the circumcision.
Its in the correct area although if you put it into 'Biblical Debates' you would narrow your audience to exclude other religious scripture such as the Vedas. That might matter if you wanted to avoid arguing about what counted as scripture. Usually its not a problem. When you pick a debate area you narrow down who replies.I am new here... so, moderators, if you please... tell me if I do wrong in
Jesus and Paul are talking about the same church, no indication otherwise
The laws are very ancient. If we go with Christian modern Bibles they begin not in Eden but on Mt. Sinai. Eden can be considered as part of the beginning of Israel, so possibly Eden is included but not in a timeline. If Eden exists before the experience at Sinai then no.
The Millennial Reign appears only in Revelation and should not be a lens for interpreting much. It should be taken in the traditional way. What we do know for sure is that it requires patience on the part of the saints. I do not take Revelation as a timetable or ordering if events at all.
I think that is probably close to the model. Paul says the circumcision are entrusted with the 'Oracles of God' which could refer to Torah or oral Torah. He seems to think that the church requires their input to function.
Jesus alludes to that, Himself, actually. Example shabbat day, which is sunday, of course, however Jesus breaks the jewish shabbat, blatantly.
Also, the dietary laws, although Jesus does not give specifics, as far as I know.
Interesting that Jesus's followers had no problem breaking the shabbat that the Pharisees were observing.
This is often interpreted as simply they were breaking shabbat, however, why? If they were keeping shabbat on a different day, of course they would be out on the other shabbat day.
Noah's world is full of violence. He is not violent. That could explain how he knows how to offer communion. There's no need to infer knowledge of the future or the mosaic covenant. There is some means by which he discerns which animals can be used. It may not be through the list given by Moses.Noah knew what the clean animals meant.
Cain is not told which thing to offer or if so we are not told so. It simply says his offering is not accepted, but there is nothing in Mosaic law against an offering of firstfruits. We only know the offering isn't accepted not why unless we infer a reason. How much can we know about sacrifices having never been to one?Cain is charged with knowing what the correct offering was supposed to be. The whole world knew about burnt offerin
That is an idea you have. There is no Bible verse saying the world gets knowledge through Noah. The only inkling is that a covenant is made, but what do we know about covenants?The whole world knew about burnt offerings because of Noah... and they carried it to their lands in various forms, which some call the patriarchal religion.
By the way you can start a thread in Same Faith Debates that specifies you only want to debate with those Christians who believe in a millennial reign or any specific set of doctrines that you specify.IMHO, Jesus references the Millennium by telling us that the Law will not pass away until the Heaven and Earth pass away... and that happens after the Millennium.
It is Ok. As long as you are polite, put up with other's outbursts and don't start telling others to accept your views you will probably not break any of the forum's ten rules very often. The no preaching rule does not exclude debate in areas marked for it. Its fine to have an opinion and defend it in debate areas. No insults allowed unfortunately, though insults are an intregal part of human communication!Thank you for that... I was starting to think that I was an alien just visiting this planet. Although I doubt that Jesus would give the right hand of fellowship to anything other than what was written in stone... He tells us that at least one of the laws of Moses were given to hardhearted people... so what He taught in Matthew 5-7 are to bring back what God had said to Moses that was to be applied to tenderhearted men who are called the blessed.
I don't mean to be offering you either rebuttal or a sermon... but I have been laboring in places where the wheat's an inch tall, and as green as grass.
I can't argue with your logic.The Kingdom Gospel is all about conditions, just as the Promise to Abraham had it's own conditions. Since Jesus tells us that the Father gave to Jesus those who belonged to God, doesn't that mean that the Law of Moses has continued from Eden through Matthew... and continues like skipping-stones, through the Revelation? Since the Heaven and Earth have not passed away and will not do so until the Millennium of the Kingdom is finished, and since Jesus says that His words will never pass away... I find that the gospel of Paul is written exclusively for the gentiles. Because according to Jesus, not one word of the Law is removed from His Kingdom Gospel, making His Gospel the gospel to the circumcision.
Jesus says if you will enter life, keep the commandments, and quotes no murder, no adultery, no stealing, no bearing false witness, honor your parents... and thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. i.o.w., if you do these things, you will be loving your neighbor as yourself.
The other 5 commandments are about loving God. Jesus proved that the rich young man didn't love God, because he loved his stuff... his is the seed that is choked by the world, in Matthew 13:22.
The Kingdom Gospel is all about conditions, just as the Promise to Abraham had it's own conditions. Since Jesus tells us that the Father gave to Jesus those who belonged to God, doesn't that mean that the Law of Moses has continued from Eden through Matthew... and continues like skipping-stones, through the Revelation? Since the Heaven and Earth have not passed away and will not do so until the Millennium of the Kingdom is finished,............
Or fewer. Didn't Christ say there were really only two?
Philadelphia is given the ability to pass through the Great Tribulation unscathed, because she is Brotherly Love... which is what good fruits literally mean.
In Bible speak, I find 'gospel' is good news such as the good news of God's kingdom of Daniel 2:44.Gospel has a modern meaning in English.