• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Justice has been made.
A 17 year old boy who was in good faith.
Who tried to help.
Being chased by a former delinquent, first.
Being chased by a mob of three people, one of them armed.

I will take off my robe of jurist for one second and I will say to these three men:
It is vile to pursue a 17 year old boy in a three against one chase.
 
Last edited:

Suave

Simulated character
That's insane.

A 17 year old took a rifle out to an event and killed people with no consequences and America wonders why it has so many mass-shooting problems.

Please rest assured, most anybody agrees a 17 year old adolescent should not be armed in public with an AR-15, I'm confident Kyle Rittenhouse's case will prompt state legislators to enact well written laws prohibited minors from possessing semi-auto rifles.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Here is an earlier article for those of us who don't know who Kyle Rittenhouse is:
Kenosha Rittenhouse trial victims: These are the 3 men he shot - CNN

Rittenhouse is at some kind of protest carrying a great big automatic weapon, and some suicidal (literally not sarcastically) person throws something at him on camera, then starts chasing him. After being chased, Rittenhouse shoots the pursuer. 2 shots in front, one glancing along the side of his head and one in back.

The prosecution argued that Rittenhouse provoked the action by pointing the gun and could therefore not use the self defense argument. This is what the jury did not accept. They still applied self defense.

Also the pursuer was not some squeaky clean citizen but had a criminal history, and that may have helped uphold the self defense claim.

The shooting alarmed other protestors, two of whom then got shot as follows:

One person tried to grab the gun away from Rittenhouse while holding a skateboard in his other hand.

The third person shot either accidentally or purposely pointed a handgun at Rittenhouse and also got shot.

That's the basic story.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Does this case differ substantially from the Arbery case? Once again, white vigilantes grabbed their guns to play cop, and ended up feeling threatened, then killed. If Rittenhouse is not guilty, are these people guilty? Will it make sense to convict them? If so, does it make sense to exonerate Rittenhouse?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Please rest assured, most anybody agrees a 17 year old adolescent should not be armed in public with an AR-15, I'm confident Kyle Rittenhouse's case will prompt state legislators to enact well written laws prohibited minors from possessing semi-auto rifles.

I am an impartial jurist.
I would have defended Rittenhouse even if he had been one of the protesters.
To me only the evidence (videos and audios) matters.

I hope politicians leave this boy alone.
 

Suave

Simulated character
Well, if the goal of the US government was to increase gun ownership and mobilization among civil rights groups, they have sure done it.
Most anybody could agree semi-auto rifle magazine clips should be limited to six rounds, this in order to reduce mass shootings. Please let us urge our Congress to place a hefty tax and national registry on private owners of high capacity semi-auto rifle magazines holding more than six rounds of ammo.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Please rest assured, most anybody agrees a 17 year old adolescent should not be armed in public with an AR-15, I'm confident Kyle Rittenhouse's case will prompt state legislators to enact well written laws prohibited minors from possessing semi-auto rifles.

There was some thinking that Kyle would at least be found guilty of this until the judge dropped the charge.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
I am an impartial jurist.
I would have defended Rittenhouse even if he had been one of the protesters.
To me only the evidence (videos and audios) matters.

I hope politicians leave this boy alone.

It's unfortunate it became political. Politics doesn't generally care about justice unless it is something they think can get them elected.
 

Suave

Simulated character
Does this case differ substantially from the Arbery case? Once again, white vigilantes grabbed their guns to play cop, and ended up feeling threatened, then killed. If Rittenhouse is not guilty, are these people guilty? Will it make sense to convict them? If so, does it make sense to exonerate Rittenhouse?
Arbery's was threatened and held at gunpoint by his assailants, I'm confident Arbery's murderer and Arbery's murderer's accomplices will be brought to justice.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
In many states he could have been charged with 'Brandishing'. Its one thing to have a gun. Its another thing to scare people with it.
 
Top