Ok. Well what you see is your experience, I guess. We all have our own experiences here. I, for one, still see greatness in the US. Not perfection by any means, but greatness.
I agree, still love my homeland. To death do us part I suppose.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ok. Well what you see is your experience, I guess. We all have our own experiences here. I, for one, still see greatness in the US. Not perfection by any means, but greatness.
I just pack heat as an armed escort for my brother who door dashes underserved communities. Does not Canada allow for delivery drivers to carry firearms?.
Unfortunately, I live near gun crazed Chicago. I wish there were sensible gun control measures in place here to prevent gun violence. Life is so unfair,. Europeans living without fear of gun violence while I guard over my brother out of fear he might otherwise be robbed at gun pointI have no idea what Canada allows. But to a European, the idea of delivery drivers carrying firearms, sounds like something out of a dystopian nightmare. I have to keep reminding myself, when talking to Americans, that I’m talking to people who see the world so differently to me.
A 17 year old boy turns up to a riot with an assault rifle, and the police let him roam about the place? That isn’t what I would expect to see in a peaceful society where the rule of law pertains. Kids too young to buy beer, walking around with machine guns? How is that ever okay?
Unfortunately, I live near gun crazed Chicago. I wish there were sensible gun control measures in place here to prevent gun violence. Life is so unfair,. Europeans living without fear of gun violence while I guard over my brother out of fear he might otherwise be robbed at gun point
Imagine......... An Assault Rifle could be the (US) Christmas present, this year, for those children who don't already have one.It is all just more evidence of a very sick country. That thinks it fine to settle things with guns.
Nothing at all I guessLive updates: Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty in Kenosha shooting
What does this portend for America's future?
Nothing at all I guess
Technically it was not an assault rifle since it is semi automatic, not a machine gun. But things are messed up on both ends. The police are limited in what they can do against rioters. And please note, that is what these people were. This was long after the peaceful protesters went home. We have nothing like this here:I have no idea what Canada allows. But to a European, the idea of delivery drivers carrying firearms, sounds like something out of a dystopian nightmare. I have to keep reminding myself, when talking to Americans, that I’m talking to people who see the world so differently to me.
A 17 year old boy turns up to a riot with an assault rifle, and the police let him roam about the place? That isn’t what I would expect to see in a peaceful society where the rule of law pertains. Kids too young to buy beer, walking around with machine guns? How is that ever okay?
No. There are situations where carrying a gun is lawful, but it must first be authorized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.I just pack heat as an armed escort for my brother who door dashes underserved communities. Does not Canada allow for delivery drivers to carry firearms?.
When it came to the verdict the jury had no choice. The prosecution had charged him based upon politics and not what he actually did. The shootings that he did were all self defense, not murder, but they based their charges on assuming that it was murder. Charges that would have put him away for a few years instead of a lifetime could have been made instead of ignoring the evidence that they had from the very beginning. They wanted to show their political correctness.I can't really comment as to the justice of the decision made by the jury, and especially coming from outside of the USA, but the message seemingly sent out from this verdict doesn't portend much good for the future, and perhaps for Rittenhouse himself, given that he probably has made half the country his enemies. Too many verdicts where deaths have been dismissed almost casually it might seem to outside observers, even if such incidents are so often rather more complicated, and especially where non-whites are involved. So just another to add to the long list that contribute to feelings of injustice most likely for so many.
What!? No protection from moose gangs in Regina?No. There are situations where carrying a gun is lawful, but it must first be authorized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
We only worry about moose in October, during the rut. Then the males (as so often happens) get a little testy.What!? No protection from moose gangs in Regina?
Actually I could go along with more reasonable gun laws in the US. But you don't get to try someone because you want the laws to be different.
We will see what happens in the US in the next few years. The NRA may be sued out of business.
No. I meant it won't have much impact on America's future direction.You mean America has no future?
Well I suspected that if different charges were brought against him the verdict might have been different. His decision to take a weapon into a confrontation seems to me to be the issue, and where his immaturity played a large role. Whatever, he'll have to live with the consequences however they pan out.When it came to the verdict the jury had no choice. The prosecution had charged him based upon politics and not what he actually did. The shootings that he did were all self defense, not murder, but they based their charges on assuming that it was murder. Charges that would have put him away for a few years instead of a lifetime could have been made instead of ignoring the evidence that they had from the very beginning. They wanted to show their political correctness.
i.e. We have a right to kill other human beings in specific situations.In the Rittenhouse case I believe he was justified to defend himself. Responsibility of those deaths falls on the attackers.
Unfortunately that is currently legal here. If a person could not take a weapon to a riot things could have been different. But then rioters with weapons could have been charged as well.Well I suspected that if different charges were brought against him the verdict might have been different. His decision to take a weapon into a confrontation seems to me to be the issue, and where his immaturity played a large role. Whatever, he'll have to live with the consequences however they pan out.
Yes, even if someone is attacking you,you still have a right to defend yourself.i.e. We have a right to kill other human beings in specific situations.
He went there to provoke so he could kill people.
Why are you asking such an asinine question?If you drew your weapon in response to an active shooter who had already killed two people, would the shooter be justified in shooting you?