• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges

Lain

Well-Known Member
Ok. Well what you see is your experience, I guess. We all have our own experiences here. I, for one, still see greatness in the US. Not perfection by any means, but greatness.

I agree, still love my homeland. To death do us part I suppose.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
I just pack heat as an armed escort for my brother who door dashes underserved communities. Does not Canada allow for delivery drivers to carry firearms?.


I have no idea what Canada allows. But to a European, the idea of delivery drivers carrying firearms, sounds like something out of a dystopian nightmare. I have to keep reminding myself, when talking to Americans, that I’m talking to people who see the world so differently to me.

A 17 year old boy turns up to a riot with an assault rifle, and the police let him roam about the place? That isn’t what I would expect to see in a peaceful society where the rule of law pertains. Kids too young to buy beer, walking around with machine guns? How is that ever okay?
 

Suave

Simulated character
I have no idea what Canada allows. But to a European, the idea of delivery drivers carrying firearms, sounds like something out of a dystopian nightmare. I have to keep reminding myself, when talking to Americans, that I’m talking to people who see the world so differently to me.

A 17 year old boy turns up to a riot with an assault rifle, and the police let him roam about the place? That isn’t what I would expect to see in a peaceful society where the rule of law pertains. Kids too young to buy beer, walking around with machine guns? How is that ever okay?
Unfortunately, I live near gun crazed Chicago. I wish there were sensible gun control measures in place here to prevent gun violence. Life is so unfair,. Europeans living without fear of gun violence while I guard over my brother out of fear he might otherwise be robbed at gun point
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, I live near gun crazed Chicago. I wish there were sensible gun control measures in place here to prevent gun violence. Life is so unfair,. Europeans living without fear of gun violence while I guard over my brother out of fear he might otherwise be robbed at gun point


To be fair, we do have a lot of knife crime in London, but no guns. I used to be a delivery driver btw, not an easy job that at the best of times. Hope you and your brother stay safe.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I can't really comment as to the justice of the decision made by the jury, and especially coming from outside of the USA, but the message seemingly sent out from this verdict doesn't portend much good for the future, and perhaps for Rittenhouse himself, given that he probably has made half the country his enemies. Too many verdicts where deaths have been dismissed almost casually it might seem to outside observers, even if such incidents are so often rather more complicated, and especially where non-whites are involved. So just another to add to the long list that contribute to feelings of injustice most likely for so many.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I have no idea what Canada allows. But to a European, the idea of delivery drivers carrying firearms, sounds like something out of a dystopian nightmare. I have to keep reminding myself, when talking to Americans, that I’m talking to people who see the world so differently to me.

A 17 year old boy turns up to a riot with an assault rifle, and the police let him roam about the place? That isn’t what I would expect to see in a peaceful society where the rule of law pertains. Kids too young to buy beer, walking around with machine guns? How is that ever okay?
Technically it was not an assault rifle since it is semi automatic, not a machine gun. But things are messed up on both ends. The police are limited in what they can do against rioters. And please note, that is what these people were. This was long after the peaceful protesters went home. We have nothing like this here:

Meet the terrifying new 18-tonne anti-riot vehicle | Daily Mail Online

Personally I would like some more control on who shows up at protests. Ban both the Rittenhouses and the Rosenbaums.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I just pack heat as an armed escort for my brother who door dashes underserved communities. Does not Canada allow for delivery drivers to carry firearms?.
No. There are situations where carrying a gun is lawful, but it must first be authorized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I can't really comment as to the justice of the decision made by the jury, and especially coming from outside of the USA, but the message seemingly sent out from this verdict doesn't portend much good for the future, and perhaps for Rittenhouse himself, given that he probably has made half the country his enemies. Too many verdicts where deaths have been dismissed almost casually it might seem to outside observers, even if such incidents are so often rather more complicated, and especially where non-whites are involved. So just another to add to the long list that contribute to feelings of injustice most likely for so many.
When it came to the verdict the jury had no choice. The prosecution had charged him based upon politics and not what he actually did. The shootings that he did were all self defense, not murder, but they based their charges on assuming that it was murder. Charges that would have put him away for a few years instead of a lifetime could have been made instead of ignoring the evidence that they had from the very beginning. They wanted to show their political correctness.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No. There are situations where carrying a gun is lawful, but it must first be authorized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
What!? No protection from moose gangs in Regina?

Actually I could go along with more reasonable gun laws in the US. But you don't get to try someone because you want the laws to be different.

We will see what happens in the US in the next few years. The NRA may be sued out of business.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
What!? No protection from moose gangs in Regina?

Actually I could go along with more reasonable gun laws in the US. But you don't get to try someone because you want the laws to be different.

We will see what happens in the US in the next few years. The NRA may be sued out of business.
We only worry about moose in October, during the rut. Then the males (as so often happens) get a little testy.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
When it came to the verdict the jury had no choice. The prosecution had charged him based upon politics and not what he actually did. The shootings that he did were all self defense, not murder, but they based their charges on assuming that it was murder. Charges that would have put him away for a few years instead of a lifetime could have been made instead of ignoring the evidence that they had from the very beginning. They wanted to show their political correctness.
Well I suspected that if different charges were brought against him the verdict might have been different. His decision to take a weapon into a confrontation seems to me to be the issue, and where his immaturity played a large role. Whatever, he'll have to live with the consequences however they pan out.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Well I suspected that if different charges were brought against him the verdict might have been different. His decision to take a weapon into a confrontation seems to me to be the issue, and where his immaturity played a large role. Whatever, he'll have to live with the consequences however they pan out.
Unfortunately that is currently legal here. If a person could not take a weapon to a riot things could have been different. But then rioters with weapons could have been charged as well.
 

Aštra’el

Aštara, Blade of Aštoreth
He went there to provoke so he could kill people.

You are entitled to your opinion, but you phrase this as if it’s fact. It’s not. Your statement is inaccurate and either severely misinformed or deliberately misleading. Aka: Fake news.
.
KR has been found innocent of all charges. That is a fact.
 
Top