Yeah....not a good result.All I can think of is...
Not handled well.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yeah....not a good result.All I can think of is...
Not sure what the point of this post is. It seems unnecessarily derogatory, but feel free to correct me if I misunderstood what you intended to convey there.
To say "not a legitimate woman" is provocative.Sometimes I wonder about this crazy mixed up world. I just see it for what it is.
Frankly I don't see nor view Laurel as a legitimate women.
Sometimes I wonder about this crazy mixed up world. I just see it for what it is.
Frankly I don't see nor view Laurel as a legitimate women.
It seems obvious. That big of a failure she must be a Venture.Inconclusive.
I'll just let that do the speaking for me.To say "not a legitimate woman" is provocative.
To say "trans woman" is both accurate & neutral.
So the latter works best...unless provocation is the goal.
You'd think the science and medical consensus would be good enough. But it's not because everyone loves to pretend they're an expert and know everything about a such they don't know snakes from dildos about.1) What is "crazy" or "mixed up" about the acknowledgement of gender dysphoria or the scientific consensus that there's no objective basis for what constitutes gender identities?
1) What is "crazy" or "mixed up" about the acknowledgement of gender dysphoria or the scientific consensus that there's no objective basis for what constitutes gender identities?
2) Does your definition of "real women" exclude trans women in general, or is there anything specific about Laurel Hubbard that makes you say this?
Let's just say foremost things are not being handled well when it comes to the classification of sexual identities as a mental illness.
Most know it, but say nothing for fear of being labeled 'transphobic' or some other creatively thought up term as a put down for something that is clearly not normal to begin with.
Removing and sewing on genitalia , then injecting in hormones, steroids, somehow dosent strike me as being particularly healthy in my view in the first place. I understand the mental issues involved, and if that is what it takes for a person to feel better I'm all for it, go ahead it's your body, but at the same time, I'm certainly not going to give anyone the satisfaction of being called something they are actually not.
Can I change my present view? Of course.
If the day comes when transition results in a complete genetic change, entire bone structure transformation, uterus development, capability to produce offspring. I'll gladly rescind my present views.
I have nothing against individual choice but I'll be dammed if I'm going to be muzzled or decried for speaking my own views on the issue. Especially when it bullies itself in on those who don't deserve it such as in women's sports. It's unfair, it's nasty, and it's unwarranted to natural women who no longer will be able to compete because of this.
I said beauty pagent because it's the only way to get the obvious across, and making a proper solid point on something that needs to be put out.
it's intended as a proper slap in the face for people to wake up and get back on track to stop the madness of pretending to be something that one is not.
Like this 'transphobic' 'hater'.
Pretending was me trying to be male. It was me going through the motions, and living a life so empty I wanted to die (especially when you add in the threats of eternal Hellfire given I used to be a Southern Baptist). That was madness, and I'd rather die than go back to it.it's intended as a proper slap in the face for people to wake up and get back on track to stop the madness of pretending to be something that one is not.
That strikes me as being particularly ignorant of transitioning. Such as, hormones come long before surgery, and they aren't necessarily injected. And "removing and sewing on" isn't really accurate given things are more-or-less rearranged.Removing and sewing on genitalia , then injecting in hormones, steroids, somehow doesn't strike me as being particularly healthy in my view in the first place.
I know several in real life and I'm certainly on friendly terms. You can do that you know, while still holding a mutual respect for one another's personhood even if opinions are diametrically opposed.What a weird, weird hill to die on. Does it honestly matter that much to you? Like, does this really upset you?
I suggest befriending trans people in real life and share a drink or two. Get to know who they are and their lives. Not saying that will change your mind, but in listening to your spiel, it seems you've become real set in your ways on an issue you have no first hand, or any hand experience with. I'm not sure you can empathize with this nearly as much as you think you can, but that could just be me assuming things.
To say "not a legitimate woman" is provocative.
To say "trans woman" is both accurate & neutral.
So the latter works best...unless provocation is the goal.
I rest my case.But I will throw out, the "real/legitimate woman" thing does end up excluding many who were born as and identify as women.
Only about 50% of women have the "female hips," some women are born XY, and someone women are born without a uterus and cannot produce offspring. That doesn't make them any less of a woman.If the day comes when transition results in a complete genetic change, entire bone structure transformation, uterus development, capability to produce offspring. I'll gladly rescind my present views.
Saying it's madness, and not well handled, crazy and mixed up, and people pretending, I have my doubts on your claims here.I know several in real life and I'm certainly on friendly terms. You can do that you know, while still holding a mutual respect for one another's personhood even if opinions are diametrically opposed.
It is possible.
It's not what a person does to their body that is irksome.Pretending was me trying to be male. It was me going through the motions, and living a life so empty I wanted to die (especially when you add in the threats of eternal Hellfire given I used to be a Southern Baptist). That was madness, and I'd rather die than go back to it.
I'll take looking in the mirror and not seeing an overtly and very masculine face any time. Being less detached from my life and finding what paths and tracks I want to take for the rest of it is wonderful. It's a pleasant feeling to just appreciate being alive, especially when most of your life has been a black hole and yearning for death.
That strikes me as being particularly ignorant of transitioning. Such as, hormones come long before surgery, and they aren't necessarily injected. And "removing and sewing on" isn't really accurate given things are more-or-less rearranged.
To say "not a legitimate woman" is provocative.
To say "trans woman" is both accurate & neutral.
So the latter works best...unless provocation is the goal.
What about bone structure?I rest my case.
Only about 50% of women have the "female hips," some women are born XY, and someone women are born without a uterus and cannot produce offspring. That doesn't make them any less of a woman.
It's like when the Harry Potter author made a comment about women and menstruation. Not all women do menstruate. But we have this long standing idea that a woman's value is tied to her ability to bear children. But women who can't, or simply just don't, are not any less of a woman because of it.
Blame the Kinks.Saying it's madness, and not well handled, crazy and mixed up, and people pretending, I have my doubts on your claims here.
Kind of like when a white supremacist says he isn't racist because he has some black friends.
I know several in real life and I'm certainly on friendly terms. You can do that you know, while still holding a mutual respect for one another's personhood even if opinions are diametrically opposed.
It is possible.
The guilt train dosent work with me. Don't even try."Personhood" wouldn't the word that would spring to my mind in the way you described trans folks. I'm not sure if you realized just how much demonizing and belittling was going on there.
Like I said, though, what a weird hill to die on.
Hips are bone structures. I've also known several women who are over 6 feet tall. One the gymnasts on the US Olympic team, she has bigger shoulders than I do.What about bone structure?
Good thing that view didn't win when it came to women in the work place, ending racial segregation, gay marriage, or accommodations for the physically handicapped.It's the practice of bullying and muscling in of ones views on those who dont see things on the same level, and don't appreciate the forced attempts to make other conform or acknowledge something they won't accept.
The studies haven't been conclusive there is an advantage, and if someone starts to transition before puberty then any concerns of an advantage are entirely nullified.In this case, it's the intrusion into natural women's sports.
The guilt train dosent work with me. Don't even try.
With exception to unwarranted and undeserved violence, I dont see how those issues equates with transitioning. Maybe elaborate what's similar?......
Good thing that view didn't win when it came to women in the work place, ending racial segregation, gay marriage, or accommodations for the physically handicapped.....