Yerda
Veteran Member
They campaigned loudly against a soft Brexit, split the Labour party in the run up to a general election knowing that hard-Brexit and a Johnson government was their best chance to regain control of Labour.They did? I don't remember that. I do remember that they were not in power at the time.
So what are you talking about here? How would Labour be responsible for the Tories' plans?
And it worked.
And we're all paying for it.
There was greater support for Brexit when Starmer was advocating a second referendum a couple of years ago.LuisDantas said:That they need popular support if they hope to win elections and form a government, and there is still far too much sympathy for Brexit at least as an abstract concept?
I feel quite the same.It's sometimes hard to fathom for me, at least as an outsider looking from across the pond. From what I've heard from various Europeans (not just here on RF), the EU seems to have mixed reviews. Some think it's wonderful, and others, not so much.
Around the same time as the formation of the EU, there were those in North America pushing NAFTA and envisioning a continental/regional economy patterned after the EU, even proposing a common currency, the Amero. There were those who even envisioned AFTA, a unified open trading bloc encompassing the Americas and the entire Western Hemisphere. I actually thought this idea had some promise, but only if it were a democratic-socialist economic structure - which the Powers That Be would never go for.
But in America, as well as in many other countries, there seems to be an underlying resistance to the idea of a "global economy" or any kind of unified "world government," regardless of what form it might take. I myself have mixed views on this, although I have to concede that ultimately, humanity's only hope for survival is to eventually unify in some form or another. I'm just not sure how that would be done or what form it should take.
The EU isn't perfect and there are arguments against it from all over the political spectrum. There are some constraints upon state aid and national ownership that are inconsistent with national sovereignty, imo. And most of the power in the EU is, like America, held by a few large banks. But there are good reasons to be inside a trading bloc rather than outside of it as we're seeing. As well as the relative ease in moving to e.g Amsterdam, Rome, or Prague should the opportunity arise.