We're conscious. The universe is unconscious as best we can tell - certainly at the scale of human experience. Unconscious matter is purposeless..
Whoa, hold on there.
We are part of the universe, as are all creatures.
We are not aimless, so nether is "the cosmos".
So no rebuttal then? Shall we consider the matter resolved? Can we assume that if you had such an argument, we would have seen it by now? I do.
I know you do, but the matter is not resolved.
One or two sentences of a reply could not resolve it.
I would agree that scripture appears to
suggest an anthropomorphic "God", but if one ponders upon God's nature, one cannot precisely define what God actually is.
One could write many books just on that topic alone.
To my understanding God is not a person, like a king is a person.
ALL OF OUR SOULS
BELONG TO GOD.
The above statement shows the infinite nature of God, and God does not need wifi to know what we are thinking, for example.
One has to think in terms of the non-material .. the unseen .. the undetectable.
We say that God is One, but that does not imply "a superior soul/person" .. it implies that the source of all is the only one worthy of respect and has supreme knowledge and authority.
..sorry, I might be rambling a bit .. it is not easy for me to explain.
For example, God knows what a tree and a rock is feeling. He feels/knows about every atom. A deist also has similar concept.
That was in response to, "Once again, show me the reasoning. These claims have no persuasive power without a sound argument preceding them." Your response included no reasoning. Can we assume once again that that is because you have no reasoning to show? I do.
It is not through a lack of me trying.
You seem to see the cosmos as "dead", apart from the reasoning of creatures with brains. You assume this, because you assume that something without a brain is "dead" .. is a tree dead?
Can a tree feel pain?
Yes, it's my opinion, but I also contend that it is correct. Show me a religion that doesn't contain dogma. My worldview, humanism, contains no dogma, but it's also not a religion.
Dogma: a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.
..so it all comes down to the source of the authority. That is what needs to be established.
In your worldview, there is no claim other than a human authority, reached by a human consensus.
Regards your "birth control" objection, where is the source of authority for this "fatwa" or ruling?