LGBTQ

[Kathryn]

It says only to ask other people.

You can't connect the dots? OK, I'll spell it out for you since apparently that's what you need:

Laken Riley, Kate Steinie, Jeremy Caceras, Shannon Jungwirth and her son Jorge, Melissa Powell and her son Riordan Powell, Catalina Andrade and Merced Ballon, and Aiden Clark can no longer exercise any rights at all.

 

[Kathryn]

You don't seem to know many people.

Oh well, think whatever you want.

 

[Revoltingest]

You can't connect the dots? OK,

See the edited post.
You're alluding to the problem of eligibility
to compete in women's sports, but not
addressing rights conferred by government.
This evades the question about what rights
Republicans are being denied.

 

[Kathryn]

I'm curious about your answer to the question posed too.
But your response evades it.

You aren't talking about sexual preferences here.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

True; but the vast majority of them are white.

No this is not about intersectionality, there are plenty of black and brown people who disagree with LGBTQ. As a matter of fact, there are a higher percentage of black people who disagree with this than white people; (I’m black so I have more knowledge of black issues than other races) especially when it comes to black churches compared to white churches. This would make blacks more guilty of LGBTQ bigotry than white people, yet they are put under the banner but white people are not.

Okay, so how does this relate to "T" being a part of LGBTQ+ and not black and brown people?

 

[Revoltingest]

You aren't talking about sexual preferences here.

Correct.
You aren't answering the question.

 

[Kathryn]

Correct.
You aren't answering the question.

I already answered it. Sorry you disagree with that answer.

From Post #101:

Laken Riley, Kate Steinie, Jeremy Caceras, Shannon Jungwirth and her son Jorge, Melissa Powell and her son Riordan Powell, Catalina Andrade and Merced Ballon, and Aiden Clark can no longer exercise any rights at all.

 

[Revoltingest]

I already answered it. Sorry you disagree with that answer.

What rights are Republicans being denied?

 

[Kathryn]

What rights are Republicans being denied?

See above post. And I am done answering you.

 

[Revoltingest]

And I am done answering you.

You never started.

 

[Kathryn]

You never started.

I did, and finished. You didn't like my answer. So what.

 

[Revoltingest]

You didn't like my answer.

You didn't answer.
You continue evading the question.
That's what I don't like.

 

[Kathryn]

You didn't answer.
You continue evading the question.
That's what I don't like.

Sorry you feel that way. I have answered very clearly.

 

[Revoltingest]

Sorry you feel that way. I have answered very clearly.

I'll clearly state that Republicans aren't being
denied rights that are afforded to other groups.

 

[Kathryn]

Here was the question:

and what rights are Republicans being denied to being given a back seat to?

And here are my answers, which are the only ones you are going to get because it should be obvious:

From Post #97:
Well, for starters, ask Laken Riley, Kate Steinie, Jeremy Caceras, Shannon Jungwirth and her son Jorge, Melissa Powell and her son Riordan Powell, Catalina Andrade and Merced Ballon, and Aiden Clark about their rights and whether or not they can exercise them.

And from Post #101:
Laken Riley, Kate Steinie, Jeremy Caceras, Shannon Jungwirth and her son Jorge, Melissa Powell and her son Riordan Powell, Catalina Andrade and Merced Ballon, and Aiden Clark can no longer exercise any rights at all.

Some of them and some of their relatives, are or were Republicans.

 

[Kfox]

There was no such executive order. Or such a mandate. Obama did write a letter on May 13, 2016 affirming the administration's stance that all students are protected from discrimination by title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) and its implementing regulations prohibit sex discrimination in educational programs and activities operated by recipients of Federal financial assistance. This prohibition encompasses discrimination based on a student’s gender identity, including discrimination based on a student’s transgender status.

I wasn’t talking about the one he did for schools, I’m talking about the one he did for all government contractors

President Obama Signs a New Executive Order to Protect LGBT Workers

President Obama signs an Executive Order prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

This caused business to allow males that identify as women access to female spaces. My point is, there were gay and lesbians who disagreed with this; making them (according to you) bigots against everyone under the LGBTQ banner; themselves included. Do you not see a problem here?

Specifically it read:
"As a condition of receiving Federal funds, a school agrees that it will not exclude, separate, deny benefits
to, or otherwise treat differently on the basis of sex any person in its educational programs or activities
unless expressly authorized to do so under Title IX or its implementing regulations. ...This means that a school must not treat a transgender student differently from the way it treats other students."

If that were true, that would mean transgender student who identify as the opposite sex wouldn't be allowed in the restrooms of their choosing since they don’t allow other students to do so. Yet; that was not the case.

 

[Kfox]

Again. I didn't say that

The person I was responding to said that when you entered the conversation. I assumed you agreed with him.

 

[Kfox]

Okay, so how does this relate to "T" being a part of LGBTQ+ and not black and brown people?

When you attempt to put multiple groups under the same banner; as if they were one (which they are not) you get groups under the same banner who disagree/bigoted against each other; whether it be blacks and browns against gays, or gays and lesbians against trans; these are different groups; trying to conflate them all into one doesn't make sense IMO due to this reason.

 

[Kfox]

Here's the thing that got me -men transitioning and then competing in women's sports, I mean, I am sorry if you cannot pass a gender DNA test, I really am sorry, but maybe if you can't pass it you can't compete. I don't know.

Rather than a gender test, how about if we separate everybody on the basis of biology rather than gender? If you were born with only X sex Chromosomes, (assuming you do not have Swyers Syndrome) you play women's sports, and if you have the y you play with the men. Sounds like an easy fix to me.

 

[Kfox]

All that shows is that bigotry is colorblind.

If it's bigotry, it's not against themselves.