Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I always thought it strange that gun ownage = liberty in the minds of sum.
I didn't say I find it strange that the right to bear arms = liberty. It's literally a liberty and access to do something. What liberty actually results from gun ownership in and of itself? Anyone here personally gained more liberty from owning a gun?
I don't buy it. In fact, I find the opposite to be true. Those who would take away a constitutionalThe idea is that it empowers the populous, giving them leverage against the government if need be. Ironically and unfortunately, the majority of people who believe that tend to support the political leaders who are the biggest threats to our freedom.
The idea is that it empowers the populous, giving them leverage against the government if need be. Ironically and unfortunately, the majority of people who believe that tend to support the political leaders who are the biggest threats to our freedom.
Were you an engineer familiar with the design & the history of Glock's entry into this market, you might find it a thing of beauty too.No more enthusiastic about my rifles than my fishing rods or paint brushes. I don't look at them as big boy toys that kill. There are some who go on about a massed produced Glock pistol as if it was an heirloom piece or a lover.
Geeze....sounds like you relish killing your fellow humans! (Especially rednecks, I bet.)If it came down to killing, I'd rather have it up close and personal with knives or tomahawks as to see the look in my adversary's eyes. These days however, weaponry has to be matched.
I didn't say I find it strange that the right to bear arms = liberty. It's literally a liberty and access to do something. What liberty actually results from gun ownership in and of itself? Anyone here personally gained more liberty from owning a gun?
You stated a preference for up close & personal killing, rather than shooting at a distance.I do not relish killing any living creature, but know how to use different weapons.
We're all whippersnappers to those who came before us & have earlier traditions.Oh, and I'm no young whippersnapper either.
You stated a preference for up close & personal killing, rather than shooting at a distance.
What is the desire to look in your foe's eye as you kill them with edged weapons all about?
I am a coward, & would rather run away.Guns allow some a sense of courage at a safe distance.
One uses what is at hand.If it came to such, could you fight without your guns ?
I am a coward, & would rather run away.
But if I'm to fight, I want to win quickly & with minimum risk.
To prefer a fair fight to the death makes no sense to me.
It suggests that killing humans is a sport.
We cowards just want to survive "at a safe distance".
One uses what is at hand.
This points out the importance of preserving our right to bear arms.....you never know when some madman might come at you with a tomahawk.
That seems just too glib to me. The wars (which I opposed) wereNo, sending young soldiers out to fight the fat kat's oil wars bespeaks of killing humans for sport. Liken to some board game played by devils.
So what?If someone comes at me with a tomahawk it is in my hopes of survival that he is indeed mad. Mad enough to render him not as careful as he should be.
I don't hunt.Tell me Revoltingest, have you ever been hunting, or do you just shoot at targets and bottles ?
I don't hunt.
I shoot only at targets at ranges where the lead pollution is managed.
You see, I'm one of those enviro wackos.
We all have our roles to play in advancing hunting, even Ted.Having a taste for venison and a need for hide and antler, I have hunted. Mostly I use a blackpowder rifle or my old Browning Nomad bow. If you were to read into my writings, you would see that I'm an environmentalist as well, more so than say Ted Nugent, an idiot whom my crippled cousin could probably hunt circles around.
Meh.....to each his own, as long as yer not the aggressor.If it comes down to fighting a human, I'd rather it to be up close and hand to hand, but that doesn't imply it is looked upon by me as sport. Now if a head, scalp or any other body part is taken after the fact, now that is a different story.
Counting coup without killing an enemy allows a greater honor.