Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You are right. Sorry about that. But you did seem to support that poorly reasoned post."Why bring up Dirac in the first place?"
I wasn't the one that brought him up.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are right. Sorry about that. But you did seem to support that poorly reasoned post."Why bring up Dirac in the first place?"
I wasn't the one that brought him up.
Life comes from God's spirit - Psalm 104:30; Psalm 33:6Life coming from dirt is the Bible, not science.
Do you have any reliable evidence for that? All of the reliable evidence that I know of tells us that all of the Genesis stories are myth.Life comes from God's spirit - Psalm 104:30; Psalm 33:6
Adam was formed/ fashioned from dirt, but Adam did Not come to life until 'after' God breathed the 'breath of life' into life-less Adam- Gen. 2:7
If I have it right: DNA/ RNA/ Protein components show that life can't spring from non-living matter.
Even in a science lab, who represents the scientist or lab tech in using what they use, or in trying to use.
Sinning life (sinner Adam for example) goes back returning to dirt - Gen. 3:19
We as sinners return to dust, but the 'return of life ' does Not come from dust/dirt but via resurrection.
Return of Life meaning: more than the mere existence of eating and reproducing and passing away, but enjoying life forever and ever- Rev. 21:5
.... and Earth has its built-in water cycle. Water needed for oxygen and plants, etc. get re-cycled.Water is more plausible then dirt.
Why assume that knowledge is needed? Life evolved to adapt to the cycles. No intelligence necessary..... and Earth has its built-in water cycle. Water needed for oxygen and plants, etc. get re-cycled.
Water: What goes up must come down cycle.
When city air is cut off (highly polluted) or waste sewage removal is cut off then disease and death will come.
Whereas, when pollution stops Earth quickly bounces back to its recycling eco-system needed for life.
How would Earth or water know to recycle unless intelligence was built into it. Who built that intelligence into it __________
One researcher concluded that we are all designed to look for or find built-in patterns in things: like seeing or finding patterns in the clouds.Do you have any reliable evidence for that? All of the reliable evidence that I know of tells us that all of the Genesis stories are myth.
No intelligence for our find-tuned universe ?Why assume that knowledge is needed? Life evolved to adapt to the cycles. No intelligence necessary.
What "researcher"? How did he do his research? If God made the world he also made the evidence that it reveals to us. And that evidence says that people came about through evolution.One researcher concluded that we are all designed to look for or find built-in patterns in things: like seeing or finding patterns in the clouds.
The Bible has patterns that we can follow: For example:
Genesis shows us that God gives advance warning such as with Noah being more than an Ark builder but also a preacher.
Lot and family were forewarned Not to look back. Lot's wife disobeyed and turned herself into a salt shaker.
Babylon's fall in 539 BCE was foretold in Bible prophecy
Before Jerusalem was destroyed in the year 70 by the Roman armies, the forewarned Christians already left the city around the year 66.
Today we are being internationally forewarned (Matt. 24:14; Acts 1:8; 1st Thess. 5:2-3) just as Jesus said.
So, to me the Bible's warning pattern is evidence that the rest will also come to pass.
The rest as in meaning: what was lost in Eden will be returned to us.
Earth will become a beautiful paradisical garden as Eden was a sample as described in the 35th chapter of Isaiah.
There is no evidence for it. Only bad arguments. And some of the supposed design is just apparent. For example for a while people made an argument about how gravity was finely tuned. When they were able to do the math they found that was not the case. There was only one answer. No tuning needed. You are only making an argument from ignorance, That is a logical fallacy, it is not evidence.No intelligence for our find-tuned universe ?
Even if one tours a control room that has hundreds of dials and labels each means something.
Move a dial or move or re-move a label and that can quickly add up to destruction.
The 'huge universe' has purposeful design. The Big Bang did Not create chaos but purposeful design.
What about our 'puny universe' aka each 'cell' with its purposeful design.
Design shows a Designer, a designer shows intelligence, intelligence shows a mind, a mind shows a person and a person shows a personality.
Survey around the Earth and it all points to a purposeful super-natural supreme mind or being.
Yes. All the evidence points towards us living in a simulation.No intelligence for our find-tuned universe ?
Even if one tours a control room that has hundreds of dials and labels each means something.
Move a dial or move or re-move a label and that can quickly add up to destruction.
The 'huge universe' has purposeful design. The Big Bang did Not create chaos but purposeful design.
What about our 'puny universe' aka each 'cell' with its purposeful design.
Design shows a Designer, a designer shows intelligence, intelligence shows a mind, a mind shows a person and a person shows a personality.
Survey around the Earth and it all points to a purposeful super-natural supreme mind or being.
Much of Genesis and Exodus have been contradicted by studying the world.
But what's the loss? I have no such relationship now and like it just fine.
Man’s imagination didn’t make God and cannot ever say how the world came into existence.Wow. So what's wrong with imagination, that seems to be an important aspect of our spiritual life, no?
If you said this a few centuries ago many might have accepted this, but given the progress science has shown as to providing so many answers, why do you think science has suddenly stopped finding explanations and hence might not do so in the future?Man’s imagination didn’t make God and cannot ever say how the world came into existence.
Because “I think” about the future and know what’s going to happen as is described in the Bible.If you said this a few centuries ago many might have accepted this, but given the progress science has shown as to providing so many answers, why do you think science has suddenly stopped finding explanations and hence might not do so in the future?
And - you can't even countenance that you might be wrong? Move along - plenty more like you.Because “I think” about the future and know what’s going to happen as is described in the Bible.
Addressing the OP,Maybe life sprang from dirt 3.5 billion years ago though abiogenesis but I’m beginning to seriously doubt it. The God theory is sounding more and more plausible.
Well it is, actually. We all decide on what to believe based on what seems reasonable, or at least acceptable, to us. In large measure it is what we are told by trusted authorities, or in other cases what we can see for ourselves fits widely recognised facts, or in other cases again what seems intuitively right or aesthetically satisfying.Yes people disagree with the Bible but nobody has shown that what God said that He did is not true, or what He said that He will do either, even if you do not believe in the existence of a God or that He said anything.
I don't think liking it is the test.
There is stuff there that can be seen as God lying, or God being evil etc but if you read it with a trust in the goodness of God and the truth of His Word then imo you can see it from a different perspective and see answers that someone who reads it just as a critic does not see and probably does not really want to see or accept legitimate answers that show the Bible not to be in error.
Nor need anybody. The believer doesn't need it proven to believe it, and the skeptic doesn't need it disproven to not believe it.nobody has shown that what God said that He did is not true
If one is going to call separation from God a loss, he is saying that we won't like it as well.I don't think liking it is the test.
It's already happened. The final form is in the lower left corner:If today you made a clay figurine and exposed it to moisture and sunlight, only bacteria would grow on it which you may call life but in millions of years time it won’t have developed into a conscious living ‘animal’.
It happens in nature quite frequently. Our existence depended on supernova explosions, which seeded our nebula with heavy elements that were forged during those explosions, and also caused a compression wave to initiate star formation. Also, the Big Bang was not an explosion. It was an expansion of space, it's still occurring, and its accelerating.Have you seen an explosion create something?
There's pretty good evidence it did if by God you mean the Abrahamic god. They made a few mistakes and described a logically impossible god, not to mention one already ruled out by the evidence supporting evolution theory. The god of the Christian Bible doesn't lie or deceive. If evolution didn't occur, the only logical possibility left is a deceptive intelligent designer whose fraud was discovered with falsification of the theory.Man’s imagination didn’t make God
No, they do not. Are you aware that thousands of people are devoting their professional careers to the discovering how life arose spontaneously from nonlife, and that millions of dollars are being allocated to that research? Obviously, none of those people agree with your comment.If I have it right: DNA/ RNA/ Protein components show that life can't spring from non-living matter.
All water need do is passively follow the laws of physics and evaporate when conditions are right, rain when conditions are right, flow through rivers when conditions are right, etc..How would Earth or water know to recycle unless intelligence was built into it.