False. The Bible is evidence of God
No. The bible is a collection of claims concerning gods.
and nature in all it's wonder and grandeur is evidence of God.
How?
Science cannot use that sort of evidence or even if miracles happen through prayer.
Because it isn't proper verifiable evidence. They are just claims and anecdotes (which are also just claims).
Sounds like you don't understand what valid evidence actually is.
If it's not independently verifiable, then it's just more claims.
Science has to ignore any hypothesis that God
Hypothesis are independently testable.
What you really mean are, again,
claims.
There is no "god hypothesis", because god claims aren't testable.
was involved unless the evidence is such that it can be tested and falsified.
Correct.
Unfalsifiable claims are a dime a dozen. Potentially infinite in number, only limited by human imagination.
I can come up with a bazillion unfalsifiable claims right on the spot and you wouldn't be able to disprove any single one of them, on the count of them being untestable, unverifiable, unfalsifiable. They are utterly useless and a complete waste of time.
Hence: undetectable graviton pixies. Relativity equations don't have a variable for them, or any of the other infinite amount of unfalsifiable things you could invent out of thin air, for exactly that reason.
If people want to take it past that and say that there was no God involved that is a faith statement.
Nobody does that because that too is a waste of time.
For example, how many medical papers have you read where it is said that "cancerous cells aren't caused by undetectable cancerous dragons"?
Do you know of a physicist who wastes his time trying to point out that undetectable graviton pixies aren't involved in regulating gravity?
Note the word I bolded in your statement. That's a hint of how it's a useless statement.
It's also a blatant attempt at shifting the burden of proof. YOU are the one who wants to insist a god was involved. Upto you to come with evidence for that statement.
If the best you got is "well, you can't prove god was NOT involved" then wooptie-doo.
Science as such does not do that, but skeptics and atheists do it seems, even if they deny it.
Which skeptics and atheists would that be?
Can you quote one on this forum?