Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is measuring, weighing, and observing something how you think people come to the belief or knowledge that they themselves exist? That just seems very weird to me.
I don't really care what seems real to you, it uses scientific methods to establish an accurate answer.
I don't really care what seems real to you, it uses scientific methods to establish an accurate answer.
No, belief is correlated with our concept frames. Everyone thinks in terms of concepts attached to reality.Do you think it is possible to live without any beliefs what so ever?
“One life is all we have and we live it as we believe in living it. But to sacrifice what you are and to live without belief, that is a fate more terrible than dying.” Joan of Arc
Do you think it is possible to live without any beliefs what so ever?
“One life is all we have and we live it as we believe in living it. But to sacrifice what you are and to live without belief, that is a fate more terrible than dying.” Joan of Arc
Yeah, you can avoid the supernatural, but the rest I doubt. At least there is nobody who have done it in recorded history.
For the bold, you would still have beliefs.
No, belief is correlated with our concept frames. Everyone thinks in terms of concepts attached to reality.
What beliefs for example would I need?
As I see it, my existence doesn't require belief. My existence is a fact with or without belief.
My values don't require belief. My brain sets up whatever values I happen to feel. There is no need to believe in something I experience.
I believe that atheists too believe that life has a value that transcends the mere existence.
If life were meaningless, what is the point of making children?
Children who will live a life as meaningless as their parents '?
Ahh, you use belief differently than me. Let us leave it there or we will be nitpicking the proper and correct definitions of proper, correct and definition.
That has nothing at all to do with what I said, and honestly the answer isn't even accurate. I know for a fact that you yourself did not do that to establish the belief in your own existence. Let that be the "accurate answer."
That just seems very weird to me.
my answer is accurate
Do you think it is possible to live without any beliefs what so ever?
“One life is all we have and we live it as we believe in living it. But to sacrifice what you are and to live without belief, that is a fate more terrible than dying.” Joan of Arc
What beliefs for example would I need?
As I see it, my existence doesn't require belief. My existence is a fact with or without belief.
My values don't require belief. My brain sets up whatever values I happen to feel. There is no need to believe in something I experience.
Ok, what is your definition of belief?
There is a difference between saying measurement is evidence of reality, and saying it’s the only measurement of reality. If we maintain that a thing has to be measured in order to be real, we limit our outlook considerably. Where does this leave dark matter, for example? Or particles in a superposition? If we say, in the latter case, that a particle has no existence until it is measured - and some physicists do say that - then we are lapsing into solipsism, and scientists tend not to like solipsisms.
A paradox, then. Though in truth, we believe all sorts of things we can’t see, touch, or weigh; love, for instance. And abstract concepts such as perfection, wonder, truth…
So you believe.