Little known about interior of earth

[dad]

And that is a lovely drawing.

Thanks.

 

[Tambourine]

@dad have you been to the center of the Earth, either in body or spirit?

 

[dad]

@dad have you been to the center of the Earth, either in body or spirit?

No. You thought some people had? What, you think that means we must believe whatever faith based nonsense science cooks up if we also have not been there? Make one wonder if many unbelievers in science might be trying to paint what is down there with a belief brush just to avoid what they will have to face down there one day.

 

[Howard Is]

Evil spirits presumably.

No, just misunderstood.

 

[Tambourine]

No. You thought some people had? What, you think that means we must believe whatever faith based nonsense science cooks up if we also have not been there? Make one wonder if many unbelievers in science might be trying to paint what is down there with a belief brush just to avoid what they will have to face down there one day.

So why do you believe your claim is superior when you haven't seen the truth firsthand?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Too bad you have never been to the center of the earth then. Until you have you are ignorant. There is nothing self correcting about beliefs, and grabbing new beliefs when old ones get busted.

To abandon old beliefs when they get busted, is by definition a form of self-correction dude....

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Self correcting indicates an ability to correct.

Ok. With that in mind, please explain then how abandoning busted beliefs/ideas, doesn't qualify as self-correcting?

When fable mongers simply grasp at some other belief based explanation that can't (yet) be busted, that is not a correction

How is abandoning a busted idea, not a correction?

That is something more akin to a lying politician tweaking his promises to make them seem believable till after the election.

No, it's not.

It's rather akin to someone saying "hey, look at that... turns out I was wrong" when evidence pops up that shows he was wrong.

That's what self-correction is: to stop believing those things that are shown to be false.

 

[dad]

So why do you believe your claim is superior when you haven't seen the truth firsthand?

God's truth that was revealed to man does not need to be proven superior. All that needs to happen is to expose the Satanic creation denying beliefs for what they are. Then people simply chose their beliefs.

 

[dad]

To abandon old beliefs when they get busted, is by definition a form of self-correction dude....

No belief from the bible ever got busted, and never will. The beliefs that get busted from so called science are like the leaves falling in Autumn.

 

[dad]

Ok. With that in mind, please explain then how abandoning busted beliefs/ideas, doesn't qualify as self-correcting?

Easy to do. When a cult is known to exclusively use only a limited range of possibilities all based on beliefs for all explanations, including new ones when their old ones get busted, that is not self correcting. That is flatulent fraud.

It's rather akin to someone saying "hey, look at that... turns out I was wrong" when evidence pops up that shows he was wrong.

More like a criminal in court having been shown false, and scrambling for a new story. The only issue is why should we believe her or him?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

No belief from the bible ever got busted, and never will.

Sticking your head in the sand and doing your outmost best to ignore the busts or just "declare" them wrong, won't make them go away.

The beliefs that get busted from so called science are like the leaves falling in Autumn.

Yes in science, falsifying ideas is common business. It is in fact how you achieve fame and glory as a scientist: proving all your peers to be wrong.

In science, it is a badge of honor.
In religion it is "herecy" or "blasphemy" or "apostacy".

The point exactly.

One celebrates correction, the other punishes it.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Easy to do. When a cult is known to exclusively use only a limited range of possibilities all based on beliefs for all explanations, including new ones when their old ones get busted, that is not self correcting. That is flatulent fraud.

Ow, I see. You're lying about the scientific method again.

Nevermind then.

More like a criminal in court having been shown false, and scrambling for a new story. The only issue is why should we believe her or him?

The fact that you just tried to imply science is like a "criminal scrambling for a new story", tells us all we need to know.

No reasonable discussion is to be expected from a mind like that.

So... Carry on with the bs. It won't get you very far, but you have fun being judgemental and intellectually dishonest.

 

[dad]

Sticking your head in the sand and doing your outmost best to ignore the busts or just "declare" them wrong, won't make them go away.



Yes in science, falsifying ideas is common business. It is in fact how you achieve fame and glory as a scientist: proving all your peers to be wrong.

In science, it is a badge of honor.
In religion it is "herecy" or "blasphemy" or "apostacy".

The point exactly.

One celebrates correction, the other punishes it.

Science replaces busted nonsense with more baloney from the same bag of tricks/beliefs.

 

[dad]

Ow, I see. You're lying about the scientific method again.

Nevermind then.




The fact that you just tried to imply science is like a "criminal scrambling for a new story", tells us all we need to know.

No reasonable discussion is to be expected from a mind like that.

So... Carry on with the bs. It won't get you very far, but you have fun being judgemental and intellectually dishonest.

Still nothing to say, then. OK. Happy total defeat.