Secret Chief
Degrow!
I'm sure I shouldn't say this to an ex-chemist, but... e=mc2 ?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Living Vs. Nonliving and Visible Vs. Invisible. Classification.
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
I'm sure I shouldn't say this to an ex-chemist, but... e=mc2 ?
Altfish
Veteran Member
Not when you were living in the UK it doesn't
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The matter is what matters, the bullet matters to us, so it is the matter.
The visible matter is electrons, positrons, protons, gases, liquids, wine. It is visible to us. The invisible matter does not interact even by weak interaction with visible matter. Recall the sterile neutrino. It is an example of the theoretical invisible matter.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The UK was Christian country not long ago.
Altfish
Veteran Member
The UK Head of State is also head of the state approved church, we still have state funded religious schools - it is a disgrace.
But people are voting with their feet and leaving religion
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The religion provides great comfort in the time of leaving this fallen world. In my worldview. I can fight the Armageddon battle without fear because I am immortal. I have the blood of all kings, because I am the son of Y-Chromosomal Adam.
exchemist
Veteran Member
I don't think it's the key question really, but it is a rival hypothesis. Most of the work I think is going on to understand how the building blocks of biochemistry can have come together, assuming they did so on earth.
There was an excellent thread on some of this work posted by @sayak83 .
Here is a link to it (I warn readers of a sensitive disposition that this contains serious chemistry
):Science of Abiogenesis:- By popular demand
It is amazing how easily the components of RNA come together.
gnostic
The Lost One
That is a mass-energy equivalence equation, not a matter-energy equivalence equation.
Mass is a property of matter, just as energy is property of matter.
You are confusing mass and matter.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Yeah but that just means that energy has mass and mass has energy. Both mass and energy are properties of a physical system. You can't have a bucket of mass any more than you can a bucket of energy. The physical system itself is more than these two properties.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Ninja-ed!
PureX
Veteran Member
We don't know what energy is. That's the point. Yet it is being expressed as a whole array of differentiated quantum phenomena. Or at least, so we think at the moment. We call the array of quantum phenomena "quantum particles" but they aren't really particles at all. Not in any material sense.
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
You provided reference to a source that is not peer reviewed and has absolutely no criteria for publication....in short, itis utterly unreliable as a source. This from their disclaimer on their website:
"ViXra is an open repository for new scientific articles. It does not endorse e-prints accepted on its website, neither does it review them against criteria such as correctness or author's credentials"
There is no evidence for goblins, there is no evidence for unicorns, there is no evidence for gods. How is no evidence a scientific method?
Of course if you can provide some please send me an invitation to your Nobel prize ceremony
So what you are saying is that your paper is not scientific because you cannot provide evidence to back it up? Fair enough.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Atheism acts as if it is a scientific thing: "the Science has no evidence for God". Thus, atheism and science are the same thing. Logically! There is mathematical proof in the paper, please read it, the section "abrupt geodesics".
Rubbish. Total rubbish,
Atheism : disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
Nothing more, nothing less. Anything you chose to pile on top of that is built by your own bigotry.
if you cannot provide evidence for your claim then there is no point in discussing it, no matter how much you try to prevaricate
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
In the former times, the atheists were saying simply: "there is no God".
What does it mean?
Modern atheists would explain: "atheists are totally sure, that the God of the Bible does not exist because there is no evidence for the validity of the Bible."
I would reply: there is plenty of evidence supporting many verses of the Holy Bible.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Yes we do. Energy is a property of matter, like momentum, useful in the book-keeping we do to predict how systems will behave, and defined as the property that denotes capacity to do mechanical (F x d) work, with dimensions ML² T⁻².
There are mysteries about the nature of matter, but the nature of energy is not one of them.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The matter is what matters, the bullet matters to us, so it is the matter.
Have you finished trying to derail your own thread?
I understand that you can provide no evidence for your claim and why you are trying to shift the onus. It makes no difference to me, i did not make the claim
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Please open the great viXra file, look up the section "Fixing abrupt geodesics." Can you do it for me?