Lou Dobbs, the NAU, and NWO?

[ericoh2]

Well like I said, I don't trust the source. If we had an American scientist go on national television or the internet and make these claims, and had they made these claims much earlier, I'd be more likely to buy into it. Why did it take so long to finally find evidence of explosives? And how did a Danish scientist get access to samples of the debris from the WTC when that debris was cleared away a long time ago?

I'm not sure if the other link goes into these questions, but I recommend watching the video. He addresses them there.

 

[ericoh2]

Well like I said, I don't trust the source. If we had an American scientist go on national television or the internet and make these claims, and had they made these claims much earlier, I'd be more likely to buy into it. Why did it take so long to finally find evidence of explosives? And how did a Danish scientist get access to samples of the debris from the WTC when that debris was cleared away a long time ago?

Here are a few more links that address some of the issues with the official explanation. Some American sources are provided here.

Journal of 9/11 Studies

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/911andProbabilityTheory17Legge.pdf

you can download a report about the official explanations and scientific counters to them from The Open Civil Engineering Journal here (far as I can tell this is from American sources):

Bentham Science Publishers