• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

love your enemy

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
They do. Why scripture?
to know the name of names, infers that.

ehyeh asher ehyeh
ahmi yat ahmi
tat tvam asi
ahea ashur ahea
nuk pu nuk

malachi 2:10

10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

son of man refers to humanity as a whole and not as an individual. ezekiel and jesus were both called by the name.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13913-son-of-man

and so jesus said,

John 3:14
And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:

nehushtan must be lifted up

http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/n/nehushtan.html
 

Etritonakin

Well-Known Member
Killing in and of itself is wrong no matter how its justified.

Letting him go or being preasured to kill him doesnt excuse that what I am doing is wrong. My protecting myself doesnt justify it as good just a necessity if the situation calls for it.

YES!

God actually acknowledges that he has at times purposed something which is not good in and of itself -because the situation does call for it!

Jer 26:3 If so be they will hearken, and turn every man from his evil way, that I may repent me of the evil, which I purpose to do unto them because of the evil of their doings.

If someone is doing something wrong -and the situation calls for you to do something which is necessary -but in and of itself wrong -you will not cease until they do -in order to correct the situation.

We can see what SHOULD be -but what SHOULD be requires what is now being done.

God SHOULD not kill anyone -and everyone SHOULD not sin -and that will actually be the end result of what god is doing.

Another reason for our human deaths (the next instant after which we are alive by our perception -though much time may have passed) is to create many of us in a limited and controlled environment.

God's plan is to create many children of God -and he has allowed us about 120 years of experience -generation after generation.

It is enough to gain necessary experience for what happens later.

If we were not limited in years, overpopulation would have been an issue much sooner -and we would live longer than necessary for this stage of the plan.

God limited our ability to destroy by limiting our access to the universe -until such time as we are ready to inhabit it.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
YES!

God actually acknowledges that he has at times purposed something which is not good in and of itself -because the situation does call for it!

Jer 26:3 If so be they will hearken, and turn every man from his evil way, that I may repent me of the evil, which I purpose to do unto them because of the evil of their doings.

If someone is doing something wrong -and the situation calls for you to do something which is necessary -but in and of itself wrong -you will not cease until they do -in order to correct the situation.

We can see what SHOULD be -but what SHOULD be requires what is now being done.

God SHOULD not kill anyone -and everyone SHOULD not sin -and that will actually be the end result of what god is doing.

Another reason for our human deaths (the next instant after which we are alive by our perception -though much time may have passed) is to create many of us in a limited and controlled environment.

God's plan is to create many children of God -and he has allowed us about 120 years of experience -generation after generation.

It is enough to gain necessary experience for what happens later.

If we were not limited in years, overpopulation would have been an issue much sooner -and we would live longer than necessary for this stage of the plan.

God limited our ability to destroy by limiting our access to the universe -until such time as we are ready to inhabit it.

There are only a couple of reasons why split-second killing is appropriate event though it is wrong.

Killing sinners because they sin and have not repented is not appropriate. It is not part of the "neccesity rule" of thumb. It is pre-meditated and done dileberately to maybe teach a lesson, punish, or whatever. There is no owner in killing.

Can you do you posts in paragraph format or without only one emphasis bold, italics, or underline. It messes with my eyes and I can't read what you're saying.
 

Etritonakin

Well-Known Member
There are only a couple of reasons why split-second killing is appropriate event though it is wrong.

Killing sinners because they sin and have not repented is not appropriate. It is not part of the "neccesity rule" of thumb. It is pre-meditated and done dileberately to maybe teach a lesson, punish, or whatever. There is no owner in killing.

Can you do you posts in paragraph format or without only one emphasis bold, italics, or underline. It messes with my eyes and I can't read what you're saying.

That is not what God is doing. It is not actually premeditated any more than you knowing that you might have to do certain things is premeditated. It is pre-known to a degree, but not premeditated in the sense you are talking about. The difference is that humans have limited knowledge, but God is able to consider all things. He is also responsible for the existence of everyone -and for the future of everyone -whereas we are not. God did not set out to kill sinners because they sinned. God declared the end from the beginning. The end is everyone living forever in peace and happiness. Between the beginning and the end, he considered all the possibilities which might arise. God planned how he would respond to them should they arise -because creating independent creators introduced some degree of randomness. For example, we can know that certain things will be done by people tomorrow, but we do not know exactly which things will be done by which people. Similarly, God did not know every last thing which would be done by everyone -but he knew that certain things would be done by someone. God knew that creating creators could lead to disobedience and disorder initially -so he planned for it. He did not premeditate evil, because what he does is in response -even if he planned ahead of time for what he would do if he had to respond to certain things.

If you prepare to defend yourself from various dangers which may arise, that is different than premeditating an action against a specific person. God planned to save us all from the dangers which he knew would arise -even if he did not know exactly who would be responsible for which things. God is able to know much more than we do about who will do what -because he can consider all -but the whole point of creating creators is for us to do things which are unknown -new to each other and to God. God meditated upon all things which could happen -and upon what would be necessary in any circumstance to bring us from newness -through a learning process -to perfection. God did not premeditate Satan turning against him -and he did not premeditate Adam and Eve disobeying him. He did not do those things -but had planned for what he would do if they did those things -in order to bring them back to doing the right things.

Hopefully, I can illustrate the point using the flood as an example. One might say that God premeditated the deaths of those who did evil on the earth -because he did plan it and do it. However, he did it as a response to what they were doing and chose to do -but he did it in order to eventually benefit them. Leaving them alive at the time would not benefit them. Saving Noah and his family alive would benefit even those who died, as it prepared their future. Everyone who died in the flood will be resurrected later -to a much better situation, and one which will cause them to cease to do evil. After the days of Noah, God continued to work with men -preparing them to be the government under God and Christ in the future. This did include causing the deaths of more people as a means to maintain a certain necessary situation. People were prepared by the old covenant to receive the new covenant -and the new covenant is the next step in creating the kingdom of God on Earth. Many who did not seek God or to obey him were cut off -so that they would not hinder God's plan even for them. God was premeditating their awesome future even as he removed them from the situation. The situation was required to create that future. When Christ reigns on Earth -literally -those who did seek God and to obey him will be made immortal kings and priests -and reign with him. Afterward, all who have ever lived will be resurrected -judged according to their works -and will be governed righteously in the kingdom of God -not as men now govern. They will serve and bless -not oppress. The dead will be raised to the situation which will perfect them -and their deaths were necessary to create that situation. Still, from the time of their deaths until they are made alive again will seem as an instant to them.

The future being created is for the purpose of turning all who have ever lived from evil. A government will then be in place to make it so -and the removal of the evil in the past made it possible. It will be a government capable of causing war to cease. It will be a government capable of turning people from evil and teaching them good -and those who were removed in the past will benefit from this future. It will be a government which will prepare all who have ever lived to create wonderful things in happiness throughout the universe. God is able to destroy both body and spirit -but that is not to say he will do that. If God caused the permanent death of anyone, such would not be missed, as they would be an extreme danger -but that is not to say it will be necessary.

It is God's premeditation that everyone turn from their evil ways -live forever -and be happy.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
That is not what God is doing. It is not actually premeditated any more than you knowing that you might have to do certain things is premeditated. It is pre-known to a degree, but not premeditated in the sense you are talking about. The difference is that humans have limited knowledge, but God is able to consider all things. He is also responsible for the existence of everyone -and for the future of everyone -whereas we are not. God did not set out to kill sinners because they sinned. God declared the end from the beginning. The end is everyone living forever in peace and happiness. Between the beginning and the end, he considered all the possibilities which might arise. God planned how he would respond to them should they arise -because creating independent creators introduced some degree of randomness. For example, we can know that certain things will be done by people tomorrow, but we do not know exactly which things will be done by which people. Similarly, God did not know every last thing which would be done by everyone -but he knew that certain things would be done by someone. God knew that creating creators could lead to disobedience and disorder initially -so he planned for it. He did not premeditate evil, because what he does is in response -even if he planned ahead of time for what he would do if he had to respond to certain things.

If you prepare to defend yourself from various dangers which may arise, that is different than premeditating an action against a specific person. God planned to save us all from the dangers which he knew would arise -even if he did not know exactly who would be responsible for which things. God is able to know much more than we do about who will do what -because he can consider all -but the whole point of creating creators is for us to do things which are unknown -new to each other and to God. God meditated upon all things which could happen -and upon what would be necessary in any circumstance to bring us from newness -through a learning process -to perfection. God did not premeditate Satan turning against him -and he did not premeditate Adam and Eve disobeying him. He did not do those things -but had planned for what he would do if they did those things -in order to bring them back to doing the right things.

Hopefully, I can illustrate the point using the flood as an example. One might say that God premeditated the deaths of those who did evil on the earth -because he did plan it and do it. However, he did it as a response to what they were doing and chose to do -but he did it in order to eventually benefit them. Leaving them alive at the time would not benefit them. Saving Noah and his family alive would benefit even those who died, as it prepared their future. Everyone who died in the flood will be resurrected later -to a much better situation, and one which will cause them to cease to do evil. After the days of Noah, God continued to work with men -preparing them to be the government under God and Christ in the future. This did include causing the deaths of more people as a means to maintain a certain necessary situation. People were prepared by the old covenant to receive the new covenant -and the new covenant is the next step in creating the kingdom of God on Earth. Many who did not seek God or to obey him were cut off -so that they would not hinder God's plan even for them. God was premeditating their awesome future even as he removed them from the situation. The situation was required to create that future. When Christ reigns on Earth -literally -those who did seek God and to obey him will be made immortal kings and priests -and reign with him. Afterward, all who have ever lived will be resurrected -judged according to their works -and will be governed righteously in the kingdom of God -not as men now govern. They will serve and bless -not oppress. The dead will be raised to the situation which will perfect them -and their deaths were necessary to create that situation. Still, from the time of their deaths until they are made alive again will seem as an instant to them.

The future being created is for the purpose of turning all who have ever lived from evil. A government will then be in place to make it so -and the removal of the evil in the past made it possible. It will be a government capable of causing war to cease. It will be a government capable of turning people from evil and teaching them good -and those who were removed in the past will benefit from this future. It will be a government which will prepare all who have ever lived to create wonderful things in happiness throughout the universe. God is able to destroy both body and spirit -but that is not to say he will do that. If God caused the permanent death of anyone, such would not be missed, as they would be an extreme danger -but that is not to say it will be necessary.

It is God's premeditation that everyone turn from their evil ways -live forever -and be happy.

I do have a question. If people do not turn to god for repentence, and they "suffer the consequences in the afterlife," where do they go?

If they don't go to heaven or purgatory, then I'd assume they go to hell?

If they go to hell, was hell already set up for them to go there are did god created hell?

(It will take me a bit to read your post.)
 

Etritonakin

Well-Known Member
I do have a question. If people do not turn to god for repentence, and they "suffer the consequences in the afterlife," where do they go?

If they don't go to heaven or purgatory, then I'd assume they go to hell?

If they go to hell, was hell already set up for them to go there are did god created hell?

(It will take me a bit to read your post.)

The closest thing in the bible to the popular idea of hell is this.... but it is a story -it does not describe something which has happened, or exactly what will happen -but is used to make a point.

Luk 16:23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
Luk 16:24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
Luk 16:25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
Luk 16:26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence

The point of the story being that those who will eventually experience unpleasantness will not be turned by anything else. In the rest of the story, the rich man wants to send someone to warn his family, but is told that it would do no good.

Luk 16:30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
Luk 16:31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead

This story does not actually mean we go to hell when we die and are in the grave -it is simply used to make the point that some will not be persuaded by more gentle things. Elsewhere, things are written which are not a story -but specify how and when things will happen. It is explained that few are actually cast into the lake of fire -whatever that may actually be -until after they are resurrected. The first to be cast into the lake of fire are the beast and false prophet -then Satan a thousand years later -and only after the thousand years -when the rest of the dead are raised to the judgment -will any others have their part in the lake of fire. Not everyone raised to the judgment will have their part in the lake of fire. Some will have worked good, but were not among those called to the first resurrection. However, the lake of fire is for the benefit of even those who do have their part in the lake of fire. As it is written, they will be saved -yet so as by fire.

One important thing to consider about the story above is that the rich man then regretted his decisions during his life. He was only then persuaded. The evil are separated from those who will do good -but this is not to say they will not eventually choose to do good. The lake of fire -whatever it may actually be (though apparently unpleasant) is FOR repentance. It is an ultimatum. It is God saying that evil will proceed no further -and the evildoer will proceed no further unless they choose to do good.
If they ultimately refuse, the potential exists that they can be destroyed. The potential also exists that they experience unpleasantness as long as is necessary -forever and ever if necessary -to change their will. However, that is not to say that any will actually be completely destroyed -or that any will actually be tormented forever even though they may be potentially. Seeing their state -and the wonderful thing they are separated from -will be what it takes for some to repent. However, they will not be given the same station, reward, authority, etc. as those who did more good during their lives.

The main point is that while some may be tormented indefinitely -forever and ever -this will not necessarily be the case. Though the fire may be eternal, people's experience of it will not necessarily be so. The purpose of the fire is to refine. Tormenting some literally forever -without end -to no good end -is not what will happen.

"Hell" -the lake of fire -is one of the more confusing subjects -but it helps to read all scriptures about it. The bible was not written in such a manner as to be understood without in-depth study. In fact, God purposefully made it so -and has actually hidden understanding of it at various times and for various reasons.
Isa 28:13 But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
I hear whatcha saying.

I don't think you do, but anyway..... :(

Many other religions value diversity. We respect others who disagree with our faith and some of us, depending on culture and religion, welcome those who are interested. If they do not believe what we believe, we do not "shake the dust from our feet" and tell them "they had the opportunity."

That is judging or defining someone else's view of what makes up their reality, their religion on what you believe. I have a very hard time swallowing the Abrahamic concept of Me vs. Them.

I do not think this is explainable. It's a fact and really can't be repeated no more because it's an insult to those faiths who value other people's path. In some faiths, that "Value other people's paths" is part of their religion.

Don't know what to say.

You are stumbling over your perception of the words.

We do not force people to accept our message...like Jesus, we merely offer it on a "take it or leave it" basis. We allow people's hearts to respond as they will.
We do not judge anyone.....you misunderstand. 'Shaking the dust of our feet' is merely symbolically saying "at least we tried". We respect everyone's right to exercise their free will...this is why God gave it to us. We don't judge people, God does and he is the only one with the right to do that. If they reject the message, we don't take it personally because it is only our job to deliver it. If we fail in that assignment, then we are no better off than the ones who fail to heed it. (Ezek 3:17-19) We have a responsibility before God to warn people of his intentions...we cannot make them believe us. We don't hate them for not listening but will keep trying again and again, until God says its time to stop. The door is open to all up until that time, just like it was for the people in Noah's day. It wasn't Noah who closed the door of the ark.


No one will lose their life at the judgment who hasn't been given ample opportunity to change their attitude and ways.

How can you love a sinner who does not repent if he wants to continue what the bible defines as sin?

By not putting him to death immediately. As sinners, we all deserve to die, but God allows even sinners to live and have a chance to repent. God is looking for specific personalities to live in his kingdom. These are the ones who can love even an enemy like God does....He still provides for them.

"You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? 48 You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect."

Being "perfect" is a relative term, because nobody is perfect like God is.

That is the problem, right there. There is no justification for vengengefulness nor wrath. Being a Creator and being a human doesn't matter in regards to the sacredness of life.

You see there is your problem right there....you want to tell God how to behave.....you don't see something just a little arrogant in that?You expect him to meet your standards but you are not willing to meet his. Your life is in his hands and you want to slap his face and tell him what a lousy god he is? Seriously?

Vengeance comes as a consequence of justice. We all want to see the bad guy get his comeuppance, do we not? We are made in God's image and we have his sense of justice.
If someone has hurt or killed someone close to us, what do we want to do to them? Slap them on the wrist and send them home with a whimpy warning? Or do we want to see justice done? What is justice in that case?

That is another issue. Not everyone lives by Christian laws. So, it would be silly to assume this makes sense to non-christians and myself as it does not apply.

If we break the laws of the land, whichever society we are in is whatever punishment we receive. If I am in a foriegn country and do not have a Burka on, I could be arrested. If I am somewhere else and put my a thumbs up to mean OK, I have just insulted someone. In America, if you J-Walk in DC, you get a fine If you do so in parts of VA, you wont.

So, it depends.

As the Creator, God's laws apply to all, whether they acknowledge him or not. The whole earth is his, to with as he pleases. He makes the laws for everyone. As you said, when you move to another country, you can't take your own laws with you, you have to abide by the laws of the country you move to.
Try driving on the opposite side of the road, or growing cannibis if it is legal where you moved from, but not in your new country. The lawmakers have the right to become law enforcers.

We can't use that example to justify that god is allowed to bring wrath on people who he feels deserves it.

If God is all knowing then nothing escapes his notice. The Bible is not just a book of words....

"For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart. 13 And there is not a creation that is not manifest to his sight, but all things are naked and openly exposed to the eyes of him with whom we have an accounting."

Who better to judge us than one who can even discern the intentions of the heart? There will be no miscarriage of justice.

When a mother bores a child, once that child is born, that child has it's own personality, own spirit, and interest. That child is separate from his mother as well. Christians are separate from god in that respect.

Does the mother or father of that child allow them to do whatever they please? Who respects such a slack parent.....or who enjoys the company of such a spoiled child?
When we break a natural law like gravity, we know painfully and immediately that it was foolish to try treat that law as if it didn't apply to us.

Once we came out of god's "womb", that was it. The sacredness of life began. We are each different. We have the right to equality, to be diverse, to believe whatever is healthy for us to believe, and we have the right to say no.

Your god(s) sound like satan in the garden of Eden, they may give you the right to say "no" to the true God, but what if you find out that you chose the wrong god? Too late to do a thing about it. (Matt 24:36-39)

Christianity does not like the word "No"

Ever hear small children say that defiantly to their parents? God is our Father, so saying NO to him is tantamount to suicide. He told his people that "life or death" was in their own choices....he told them to choose life, which meant strict obedience.

This is what he said to Israel..."...if your heart turns away and you do not listen and you are enticed and bow down to other gods and serve them, I tell you today that you will certainly perish. You will not live long in the land ....I take the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you today that I have put life and death before you, the blessing and the curse; and you must choose life so that you may live, you and your descendants, by loving Jehovah your God, by listening to his voice, and by sticking to him, for he is your life and by him you will endure a long time in the land" (Deut 30:27-20)

He shouldn't be. Love your enemy.

God cannot love a traitor who turned the entire human race into sinful rebels for his own cause. He steels worship from God by becoming a substitute god for those who don't want to serve Jehovah. All worship that doesn't go to the true God, goes to the fake one by default. :(
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I don't think you do, but anyway..... :(



You are stumbling over your perception of the words.

We do not force people to accept our message...like Jesus, we merely offer it on a "take it or leave it" basis. We allow people's hearts to respond as they will.
We do not judge anyone.....you misunderstand. 'Shaking the dust of our feet' is merely symbolically saying "at least we tried". We respect everyone's right to exercise their free will...this is why God gave it to us. We don't judge people, God does and he is the only one with the right to do that. If they reject the message, we don't take it personally because it is only our job to deliver it. If we fail in that assignment, then we are no better off than the ones who fail to heed it. (Ezek 3:17-19) We have a responsibility before God to warn people of his intentions...we cannot make them believe us. We don't hate them for not listening but will keep trying again and again, until God says its time to stop. The door is open to all up until that time, just like it was for the people in Noah's day. It wasn't Noah who closed the door of the ark.


No one will lose their life at the judgment who hasn't been given ample opportunity to change their attitude and ways.



By not putting him to death immediately. As sinners, we all deserve to die, but God allows even sinners to live and have a chance to repent. God is looking for specific personalities to live in his kingdom. These are the ones who can love even an enemy like God does....He still provides for them.

"You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? 48 You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect."

Being "perfect" is a relative term, because nobody is perfect like God is.



You see there is your problem right there....you want to tell God how to behave.....you don't see something just a little arrogant in that?You expect him to meet your standards but you are not willing to meet his. Your life is in his hands and you want to slap his face and tell him what a lousy god he is? Seriously?

Vengeance comes as a consequence of justice. We all want to see the bad guy get his comeuppance, do we not? We are made in God's image and we have his sense of justice.
If someone has hurt or killed someone close to us, what do we want to do to them? Slap them on the wrist and send them home with a whimpy warning? Or do we want to see justice done? What is justice in that case?



As the Creator, God's laws apply to all, whether they acknowledge him or not. The whole earth is his, to with as he pleases. He makes the laws for everyone. As you said, when you move to another country, you can't take your own laws with you, you have to abide by the laws of the country you move to.
Try driving on the opposite side of the road, or growing cannibis if it is legal where you moved from, but not in your new country. The lawmakers have the right to become law enforcers.



If God is all knowing then nothing escapes his notice. The Bible is not just a book of words....

"For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart. 13 And there is not a creation that is not manifest to his sight, but all things are naked and openly exposed to the eyes of him with whom we have an accounting."

Who better to judge us than one who can even discern the intentions of the heart? There will be no miscarriage of justice.



Does the mother or father of that child allow them to do whatever they please? Who respects such a slack parent.....or who enjoys the company of such a spoiled child?
When we break a natural law like gravity, we know painfully and immediately that it was foolish to try treat that law as if it didn't apply to us.



Your god(s) sound like satan in the garden of Eden, they may give you the right to say "no" to the true God, but what if you find out that you chose the wrong god? Too late to do a thing about it. (Matt 24:36-39)



Ever hear small children say that defiantly to their parents? God is our Father, so saying NO to him is tantamount to suicide. He told his people that "life or death" was in their own choices....he told them to choose life, which meant strict obedience.

This is what he said to Israel..."...if your heart turns away and you do not listen and you are enticed and bow down to other gods and serve them, I tell you today that you will certainly perish. You will not live long in the land ....I take the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you today that I have put life and death before you, the blessing and the curse; and you must choose life so that you may live, you and your descendants, by loving Jehovah your God, by listening to his voice, and by sticking to him, for he is your life and by him you will endure a long time in the land" (Deut 30:27-20)



God cannot love a traitor who turned the entire human race into sinful rebels for his own cause. He steels worship from God by becoming a substitute god for those who don't want to serve Jehovah. All worship that doesn't go to the true God, goes to the fake one by default. :(

Hmm. :sleepy: I read all you said. It's hard to reply to it all without cutting and pasting.

My overall personal issue that I need to get over is trying to understand religions that, by its nature, has a Me. vs. Them point of view. From the perspective of Christianity, it is not a bad thing. God gave the opportunity for non-believers to come to him. Those who do not, cannot experience his love.

The language (and I can't speak for all, but I'll try) that many Christian's use to share their love for god and intention to save others comes off negative-indirectly. I dont know if you can see it because Christianity is all you know; that is your reality.

I am having acceptance issues that knowing you (not to be personal) and other Christians (and other religious depending-based on a recent thread) can't come out of their shoes and think "hey, you know, I understand why you say god does this. You are right, he does. I won't justify it. I wont try to sugar coat it. It is what it is."

Anyway, being on RF it's harder to do that given the nature of the site.

:leafwind:

We do not force people to accept our message...like Jesus, we merely offer it on a "take it or leave it" basis. We allow people's hearts to respond as they will.
A lot of Christians give Christianity (Christ) a bad reputation. It makes it hard to set our biases aside and learnabout each other's point of view because this simple phrase is turned into a nasty one.

In other words, that's a respectful way to put it. I heard it put very harshly.

You see there is your problem right there....you want to tell God how to behave.....you don't see something just a little arrogant in that?You expect him to meet your standards but you are not willing to meet his. Your life is in his hands and you want to slap his face and tell him what a lousy god he is? Seriously?

I had to address this.

If you can, (really, if you can), step away from that line of thinking for just a moment. I do not believe in god. I do not believe he exists. I cannot tell god how to behave; that is illogical. I can't find arrogance in that because it is illogical. You want him to conform to your terms? Your religion?"

What you are saying is literally illogical to me. That is like my telling you "you are telling Ordin (pagan god) how to behave? You are telling how lousy Ordin is?

Please come in my shoes for a minute and I am you. Do you think it is logical for you to tell me that I am telling Ordin (for sake of argument. I don't believe in Ordin) how to behave?

Can you see how that doesn't make sense?

If someone has hurt or killed someone close to us, what do we want to do to them? Slap them on the wrist and send them home with a whimpy warning? Or do we want to see justice done? What is justice in that case?

It would not be taking a life; that, I know. Unless my life or others are in danger, or I am an authority whose permission is to convict "bad guys", I'd do nothing. If my child did something wrong, I would not kill my child. My punishment will be teaching that child what right from wrong is without him experiencing the consequences to learn it He will make mistakes, of course. At least he won't say, "well, mama made me touch the fire" to the social worker--and she says "why did she do that?" "to teach me that fire burns me" We learn from things accidents. We learnfrom things we can't control or we were not taught. If we were taught and made mistake, at least the mother won't be to blame because she didn't "put that in his head" (didn't put the tree in the garden nor gave directions without details).

And so on and so forth

Your god(s) sound like satan in the garden of Eden, they may give you the right to say "no" to the true God, but what if you find out that you chose the wrong god? Too late to do a thing about it. (Matt 24:36-39)

I don't believe in god/s. Though, can you tell by how you phrase this that it is an indirect statement (at least online) of telling someone "it's too late" for something that other person doesn't even believe in.

Can you see that does not make sense? (like my Ordin example)

When a non-believer's heart is at peace; and, his or her religion prevents her from sining (doing things against her faith), objectively speaking, what makes him or her (I'll say her) not "worthy" in god's eyes?

What is the actual sin she made for rejecting god?
According to her how does it affect her well being for not loving your god?

This is from her point of view. I understand yours.

Kinda getting where I'm going with this?
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Perhaps I will just address these parts because I understand perfectly what it is you are saying. Since I remember you saying a while back that you were formerly a "Christian" (forgive me if I have that all wrong) I did not feel the need to explain because if you were brought up in a church, you will know both perspectives. I have investigated many religions, but never found God in any of them. I could never be an unbeliever, for the simple reason that God's creation itself is screaming about his existence. I am not blind or deaf.

Carlita said:
When a non-believer's heart is at peace; and, his or her religion prevents her from sining (doing things against her faith), objectively speaking, what makes him or her (I'll say her) not "worthy" in god's eyes?

When a non-believer's heart is at peace, (as in found a spiritual home) and his/her religion allows him/her to sin (but not in their own eyes) am I wrong for telling him/her that I believe that their unbelief will end up in a bad and permanent outcome? They don't have to believe me, but should I tell them? :shrug:

Perhaps I can put it this way.....

If I was sitting on my front my porch reading my Bible and I knew that the bridge was out around a blind corner because of a flash flood that washed it away, would it be OK for me to sit there and allow people to go round that blind corner, knowing that there was no time to discern the danger and just let them drop off the gorge into certain death? Am I not under obligation to at least sound the warning? Should I go down onto the road and wave my hands and tell them about the danger? I might look like a bit of a lunatic so they might not believe me, and I can't stop them from continuing on....but at least I tried to warn them......their fate will not be on my conscience because I have tried to warn them. The fact that they did not believe me, or even if they didn't believe there was a bridge there at all, is not the important thing.Their unbelief would result in their undoing.

Jesus used the days of Noah to illustrate what will happen again. (Matt 24:36-39) No one believed him either...it didn't make him wrong.

There is a calamity coming that will engulf the whole earth. It will be the day of reckoning. It is graphic and hard to contemplate something that is worse than anything that has ever happened before or will happen again, (Matt 24:21) but it demonstrates why Jesus said that "many" are on the road to death and only "few" are on the road to life. (Matt 7:13, 14)

So many people are hurtling around that blind corner, unaware of the danger that continuing on will mean for them. Should we just sit back and read our Bible and say nothing or hope that some will stop and listen and take notice? Jesus has told us to go down onto the road and warn them, whether they want to hear it or not.

What is the actual sin she made for rejecting god?
According to her how does it affect her well being for not loving your god?

Rejecting the true God in favor of adopting one that allows you to whatever you like is like denying the loving parents who gave birth to you, (but who gave you restrictions for your own good,) in favor of adopting new parents who pander to your every whim. Its the outcome that matters, not the years of enjoying an illegitimate life, with illegitimate parents. Where does it lead? They don't care if you engage in risky behaviors or even if you are in good health.
You think your real parents would ever give up hope that you would come home? (Luke 15:11-32) God doesn't give up on anyone unless they have given up on him. He will never force anyone to do anything against their will...but he will not chase after you either. It has to be a willing choice.

She gets to live the life she wants
This is from her point of view. I understand yours.

Kinda getting where I'm going with this?

Absolutely. This is why I want you to understand exactly what the Bible is saying. I am not giving you "my" point of view...I am giving you the perspective of the one with whom I believe we all have an accounting. You don't have to believe that an accounting is going to take place, but if/when it does, (as I believe it must) ALL will know who the true God is, and that he means what he says. (Ezek 7)

Forever is a long time to sacrifice for selfish reasons now, in the brief time we have to endure this poor excuse for a life. :(

I believe that it is better to sacrifice now and enjoy real happiness forever, in peace and security under God's rulership. (Rev 21:1-5) That is what I have chosen to do.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member

you can be under conviction of the law, or within the law, but nothing is above the Law.
that would be hypocrisy.

thank you for your insight

in the book of revelation, laodicea is the 7th church. laodicea means "justice of the people".
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
I believe a teaching that says to love the enemy when they deserve to be loved and don't love them when they don't deserve it, is a higher teaching.

Sometimes the enemy wants to murder, rape, torture, take over, etc. I believe such enemy should be fought back and shown no mercy since a simple turn around could mean handing victims to the enemy to do their deeds with them. That's until the threat is over, then I think it is okay or even good to love them.

Loving those who we know for sure truly deserve love, or at least more likely to deserve love, like the weak and the oppressed, always comes before loving the enemy i my opinion, and that could mean having to not love the enemy.

I believe Jesus (peace be upon him) meant it for specific cases, not a general rule.
 

Etritonakin

Well-Known Member
I believe a teaching that says to love the enemy when they deserve to be loved and don't love them when they don't deserve it, is a higher teaching.

Sometimes the enemy wants to murder, rape, torture, take over, etc. I believe such enemy should be fought back and shown no mercy since a simple turn around could mean handing victims to the enemy to do their deeds with them. That's until the threat is over, then I think it is okay or even good to love them.

Loving those who we know for sure truly deserve love, or at least more likely to deserve love, like the weak and the oppressed, always comes before loving the enemy i my opinion, and that could mean having to not love the enemy.

I believe Jesus (peace be upon him) meant it for specific cases, not a general rule.

Loving one's enemies does not mean being unwise.

Mat 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

Being merciful also helps to end conflict.
 

mojtaba

Active Member
Holy Qur'an, 41:34

Good and evil [conduct] are not equal. Repel [evil] with what is best. [If you do so,] he between whom and you was enmity, will then be as though he were a sympathetic friend.
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
By the way, there is truth loving the enemy. It is just that it has its times and conditions. In enemy hostage case, for example, there is no purpose or use in doing anything to them. They deserve being treated well if they are well monitored and managed since after all they are people just like us. Who knows, mayhaps the conflict could end with an understanding and a truce.
 
I believe Jesus (peace be upon him) meant it for specific cases, not a general rule.

I agree. It's an aphorism, rather than an iron law. Jesus himself took action against the money changers for example.

In general, much of many religions is about inner freedom, the only thing you have absolute control over.

Someone with an enemy is controlled by them to some extent, they aren't free. If instead you 'love' your enemy, then their power over you disappears.
 
Top