• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Man of Steel: Superman is Back!

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Box office report: 'Man of Steel' scores super $125.1 million | Inside Movies | EW.com

That's right people we finnaly have a good and accurate Superman film. No longer has the atrocity of Christopher Reeves damaged this film with his poor acting and degenerating story line.

I as have many others finally witnessed a Superman story that is faithful to the franchise. Although I do make an exception for the end, May a certain dead fictional character rest in peace :run:.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
It was okay. I expected more.

I mean, the effects were awesome, but he was too much of the movie feeling sorry for himself.

On the upside, he actually had a worthwhile challenge on his enemies and e fights were cool.
 

idea

Question Everything
I have not seen it, but I have fb friends who hated it - said it was hyperactive, no character development, just one of these action movies with no real unique plot made for people with ADD... I didn't watch it tho, so I wouldn't say.
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
I have not seen it, but I have fb friends who hated it - said it was hyperactive, no character development, just one of these action movies with no real unique plot made for people with ADD... I didn't watch it tho, so I wouldn't say.

Funny because everyone keeps saying this yet the original two were soulless. The common complaint the stems from comparison of the fact that it has a story and a good one...........just no Clark and Lois romance :biglaugh:. Very little of the romantic aspect of Superman and Lois is displayed though which makes this movie a flop for the Twilight fans :p
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
I dont care about the romance, but I didnt like he was an emo for most the movie.

Superman isnt supposed to be depressed. Dont get me wrong, he can be, like when stuff gets really bad he can get angry yell and *** things up with his fists and heat vision, thats all cool, but not being a mopping dude all the movie.

Yes, there were reasons for him being such, but still, its just not superman.

Its batman with less anger and more depression and superpowers.

At least we didnt see kryptonite in this one :D
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
I dont care about the romance, but I didnt like he was an emo for most the movie.

Superman isnt supposed to be depressed. Dont get me wrong, he can be, like when stuff gets really bad he can get angry yell and *** things up with his fists and heat vision, thats all cool, but not being a mopping dude all the movie.

Yes, there were reasons for him being such, but still, its just not superman.

Its batman with less anger and more depression and superpowers.

At least we didnt see kryptonite in this one :D

You must have never been around emos because I am mortal enemies with them :D.
The amount of moping he did was essentially none except for childhood which is to be expected. The rest of the film depicting his adulthood just showed him struggling to find a place in life.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
You must have never been around emos because I am mortal enemies with them :D.
The amount of moping he did was essentially none except for childhood which is to be expected. The rest of the film depicting his adulthood just showed him struggling to find a place in life.

Yeah I AM exagerating. :D

I have nothing against struggle, its just that on the whole movie how many fingers will I need for the times I saw him smile? Superman is supposed to represent hope and it is supposed to be a movie full of light. Nothing against having strong darks, not at all, it would be what makes it cool, but I saw almost no light. Even as youoted the conclusion of the mayhem was emo ( the part you didnt like of the movie and what it caused )

Thats what I ddint like. I a way, Batman was way more inspiring. Superman is supposed to be deeply inspiring.

I dont know, it just didnt do it for me. It wasnt bad at all, just didnt go with my expeectations.
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Yeah I AM exagerating. :D

I have nothing against struggle, its just that on the whole movie how many fingers will I need for the times I saw him smile? Superman is supposed to represent hope and it is supposed to be a movie full of light. Nothing against having strong darks, not at all, it would be what makes it cool, but I saw almost no light. Even as youoted the conclusion of the mayhem was emo ( the part you didnt like of the movie and what it caused )

Thats what I ddint like. I a way, Batman was way more inspiring. Superman is supposed to be deeply inspiring.

I dont know, it just didnt do it for me. It wasnt bad at all, just didnt go with my expeectations.

He smiled many times in the film and especially at the end. This film is to literally reboot a franchise that has been "sodomized, brutally raped and murdered". Sorry for the exaggeration :D.

The fact that the movie puts away very idle needless thing make it more acceptable for me. I had high expectations for this and it succeeded in delivery
 

Badran

Veteran Member
Premium Member
When i saw the trailer to Man of Steel, i got excited like a 3 year old. I loved the trailers and liked what i thought was going to be the new touches. I detected a much more serious, and partially dark approach. When the time finally came, and i saw it, it was pretty much what i was hoping for. Not that there wasn't anything i thought could be done better, but it came through more than good enough. I thought it delivered on all aspects, and left the theater more than satisfied.

I think it serves as a great set up for the sequel(s), where i think they'll be able to focus more on certain elements and compensate any fans who were looking for more of certain things. Just to be safe, i'm putting all the following in spoilers:

I think they'll naturally be able to expound on the romance, the villains, and, essentially, Superman kicking ***.

I think there was already enough of the last element in this one, and understand all the stuff he went through at a young age, because this is essentially what the whole inner conflict was about. Without that the movie would've been a lot lighter, and i think they did a good job in giving depth to his character. The contrast between what he can do and what he actually does when he has a choice is an interesting aspect, so is his confusion about his place in the world, and his general hesitance. These are elementary aspects to go through and if they were not found i think the movie would've been a lot less impressive. All that said though, i also understand why some people would be looking for a bit more aggressive or perhaps energetic Superman, and think this might happen in the next installment.

In regards to villains, i also think the villain in this one was pretty cool. I liked Michael Shannon's performance, and Zod's whole entrance to earth was awesome. But, naturally, since this one is oriented around Superman coming into being, there's less space for the villains. Zod's motives and personality in general weren't exactly intriguing for me, but i found them interesting enough. Coupled with Shannon's performance, and some of the set up around him, such as the awesome assistant Faora-Ul (Antje Traue), his dark entrance to earth and the fact that he almost took over his planet and killed Superman's father more than did the job in making him a pretty serious villain.

I found the cast in general to be excellent. To address those i haven't already addressed, Henry Cavill is a perfect Superman, Russel Crow rocked as Jor-El, Amy Adams did a pretty cool job (and i generally find her to be pretty hot, so that's a bonus :D), Kevin Costner's performance was touching to me, so was Diane Lane's, and even in smaller roles i liked seeing certain faces such as Laurence Fishburne. They really added weight to the movie.

The only thing that i felt could have used more work was Kevin Costner's death. I really liked the idea of how they made him die, how Superman would stand their helpless despite being fully capable of saving him. But i think they rushed it a bit, and didn't squeeze enough out of it. There was nothing lacking on Costner's end, but I think they didn't work on Cavill's reaction properly and rushed the whole thing like i said. It could've added a lot of depth to his character if done more dramatically. It felt like something was wasted as i really liked the idea, but i think they might've not wanted to delve too much into dramatics for fear the movie would be perceived as too dark.

Finally, not to forget, as to the action; it was of course terrific. So, overall, like i said i found it pretty awesome.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
When i saw the trailer to Man of Steel, i got excited like a 3 year old. I loved the trailers and liked what i thought was going to be the new touches. I detected a much more serious, and partially dark approach. When the time finally came, and i saw it, it was pretty much what i was hoping for. Not that there wasn't anything i thought could be done better, but it came through more than good enough. I thought it delivered on all aspects, and left the theater more than satisfied.
I'm hoping to see it next weekend.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
if they were going to make suoerman kill, the first movie wasnt at all the right moment to do it IMHO. But oh well, batman begins wasnt wow either. So I hope the second superman movie really rocks my socks.

I understand and liked to a oint his inner struggle, but Superman is supposed to be the one loved by the world and the press, this makes him have more "light" in tone than Batman. He was too emo for most the movie. I understand anormal person would under his circumstances, but I dont expect him to be a normal person us superpowers.

I hated his dad's death. I may be a vegetarian all I want but come on! For the dog?! Seriously?! Cant help feeling like he knew he wouldnt make it and came back for e dog to teach traumathize clark into not saving people cause world isnt ready.

I liked the appears to be autstic thing that they played with his senses, but he was too much of a loner and traumathized guy for almost the entire movie. Yes it would be to be expected, but s I said, I want Superman to be more than the general in an emotional level too.

I dont know. It simply lacked it for me. I admit I amostly a Batman fan though, but I find it ironic. They delivered in what Iwas truly afraid, which was giving a cool villain and cool fight, but then failed in all the stuff I thought they would have for a given.

In summary, it was just to dark for a superman movie. Not having any problem with it having darkness or intense darkness, but it alsoeeds intense light to contrast. I didnt feel that.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
No matter how you dress it up, it's still hard to make a guy in a cape and tights not look silly.

Honesstly is is one for the stuff I liked. He looked really cool.

My only oection about s looks is...

WHERE IS THE CURL?! The curl is classic! :eek: we need the curl! Its so classic superhore parodies everywhere exagerate it on their caricatures! Hw could they leave it out like that?! :cover:
 

Badran

Veteran Member
Premium Member
if they were going to make suoerman kill, the first movie wasnt at all the right moment to do it IMHO. But oh well, batman begins wasnt wow either. So I hope the second superman movie really rocks my socks.

I understand and liked to a oint his inner struggle, but Superman is supposed to be the one loved by the world and the press, this makes him have more "light" in tone than Batman. He was too emo for most the movie. I understand anormal person would under his circumstances, but I dont expect him to be a normal person us superpowers.

I hated his dad's death. I may be a vegetarian all I want but come on! For the dog?! Seriously?! Cant help feeling like he knew he wouldnt make it and came back for e dog to teach traumathize clark into not saving people cause world isnt ready.

I liked the appears to be autstic thing that they played with his senses, but he was too much of a loner and traumathized guy for almost the entire movie. Yes it would be to be expected, but s I said, I want Superman to be more than the general in an emotional level too.

I dont know. It simply lacked it for me. I admit I amostly a Batman fan though, but I find it ironic. They delivered in what Iwas truly afraid, which was giving a cool villain and cool fight, but then failed in all the stuff I thought they would have for a given.

In summary, it was just to dark for a superman movie. Not having any problem with it having darkness or intense darkness, but it alsoeeds intense light to contrast. I didnt feel that.

Blasphemy! :D

I think:

Now that he's built as a character and we've seen his development, the aspects you want to see may come. He went through the death of his earth father, knowing that his biological father was killed, had to kill a man, confronted the world etc.....Now, he is Superman. Or at least, much closer to that than he was. At first he was just a kid with special powers, but now he's more than that. He went through love, anger, loss of loved ones, had to confront himself and others etc...

I hope you get what you're hoping for in the next one. :D
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Honesstly is is one for the stuff I liked. He looked really cool.

My only oection about s looks is...

WHERE IS THE CURL?! The curl is classic! :eek: we need the curl! Its so classic superhore parodies everywhere exagerate it on their caricatures! Hw could they leave it out like that?! :cover:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH! :banghead3

I keep hearing this complain! Superman is now in the 21 century and nobody has awful curls like that anymore. Every Superman fanboy has been complaining about this.

What is so important about a metro-sexual hair curl?
 

Penumbra

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I thought it was awesome. That's exactly what I wanted in a Superman movie: action that makes the climax of Avengers look like amateur hour.

Now, I saw 'Lincoln' at around the same time, and that's a "better" movie worthy of the awards it received and I enjoyed it. But I didn't go to Superman to see a movie like Lincoln; I wanted to see Superman!

In my view (spoilers):

Cons:
-Despite being long, the movie felt a bit rushed in the first half. They had so much material to fit in, so I probably wouldn't have done much different.
-A few scenes were corny, probably homages to the original.
-I find the socioeconomic explanation for Krypton's downfall improbable. This is more a problem with the source material than the movie; Krypton's destruction never quite really made sense. It is a 100,000+ year old civilization that abandoned its space colonies and so 100% of the colonies were not self-sustaining and died (even though I'm sure some were near yellow stars...), and then despite their ridiculous technology they were unaware of how to not destroy their planet's core, and then given days or weeks of warning they couldn't or wouldn't do any sort of evacuation plan despite clearly having the ability to casually send prisoner's into space like it's no big deal. And despite once being a space colonization species, they had no people at all in space on any nearby planet or space station or moon or anything other than Zod and crew. Yeah, okay.
-The action was a bit iterative in intensity. When Superman was fighting the big machines I was getting bored with it (I'm like yeah, yeah I know he's going to win let's just get on with this part), until there was a pause and the action shifted towards the Zod/Superman fight.
-Superman had a really bad day but looked totally fine at the end. I guess they have to keep it PG-13 but it seemed to me that Superman should be a bit bloody and bruised to make the whole thing look harder. He was fighting other Kryptonians; they can make him bleed. When he 'died' in the fight against Doomsday in the comics he was a bloody mess...

Pros:
-It was exactly like what I expected.
-Superman wasn't "emo" as some people say; he was serious. There's a difference. I didn't want to see a goofy Superman that can fly around the world to turn back time like in the first movie (which doesn't even try to make sense). He just got the job done.
-I think it was reasonably well-acted and written enough, for what it was.
-This is the first live action Superman to really make use of current technology to showcase his power. That's what a fight between Kryptonians should look like.
-Faora was awesome.
-Superman was freaking hot.
-This serves as a solid base to build a sequel. This crammed all the origin story and a credible threat into one movie, so hopefully in a sequel they can slow it down a bit and create a more complex plot with more character development and better pacing. (Probably Lex Luthor, so it won't be a slugfest...)

9/10
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Blasphemy! :D

I think:

Now that he's built as a character and we've seen his development, the aspects you want to see may come. He went through the death of his earth father, knowing that his biological father was killed, had to kill a man, confronted the world etc.....Now, he is Superman. Or at least, much closer to that than he was. At first he was just a kid with special powers, but now he's more than that. He went through love, anger, loss of loved ones, had to confront himself and others etc...

I hope you get what you're hoping for in the next one. :D

I just reaaaaaaaaaaaally hope you are right :D
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH! :banghead3

I keep hearing this complain! Superman is now in the 21 century and nobody has awful curls like that anymore. Every Superman fanboy has been complaining about this.

What is so important about a metro-sexual hair curl?

If you want to get rid of something then

get rid of the fuuuuu stupid glasses thing! :cover: I cant believe they keep trying that?! Now?! Seriously?! :cover:
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
I saw it yesterday.

My initial thoughts: very strong first half, weak second half because of WAY too much action, very strong denouement.

I also like how they stuck it to the status quo(which has always been Supes' worst enemy) and made
Lois Lane know who he is right away. Nice touch, since Clark and Lois have been married in the comics forever now('till the recent New 52 reboot and the STUPID idea of linking Supes with Wondy); the old status quo just doesn't work anymore.

Now, as to why they decided to make Clark's long time friend Jimmy Olsen into Jenny Olsen... I have no idea. (Not really a spoiler; this is news that got out before the movie was released, and she ultimately has nothing to do with the plot, only making a very small token appearance near the end.)

But overall, I thoroughly enjoyed it. Highly recommended for fans of superhero movies.
 
Last edited:
Top