But it's how you know this that interests me. Don't believers in other religions make the same claim for their mythology?I know 100% the flood occurred. All that know and love God do.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But it's how you know this that interests me. Don't believers in other religions make the same claim for their mythology?I know 100% the flood occurred. All that know and love God do.
That is my understanding, in fact.Sorry, I thought you were claiming that ...
Tell that to the Sikhs, Hindus, or Buddhists.The true religion obeys Jesus.
That is a single mark, there are many marks to look for.According to Jesus' brother James, this is true religion:
James 1:27 Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.
And God says he inspired the words. I do understand most translations have been altered.No, the various religions claiming to be Christian obeys their various interpretations on the meaning of purported quotes offered by anonymous apologists writing decades after the words were presumably uttered.
Forgive me if I find that less than clear, much less compelling.
A true follower lives by faith.No, you do not. That is a false claim on your part. If you did then you could explain away all of the evidence against the flood in a reasonable way. But you do not even understand the concept of evidence. The simple fact is that you lack the knowledge to make that claim.
Are you willing to learn?
They do. God will show all.But it's how you know this that interests me. Don't believers in other religions make the same claim for their mythology?
Here we agree. It's a sad truth.A true follower lives by faith.
No, The Book &/or tradition says that.And God says he inspired the words. I do understand most translations have been altered.
So one day we'll all confront Huitzilopochtli?They do. God will show all.
Where does God say that he inspired the words?And God says he inspired the words. I do understand most translations have been altered.
Oh yes......I expect that the Hebrew population was a mere nothing compared with the claimed 600,000.There is no evidence of a large population of Hebrews existing in ancient Egypt -- and in a literate, arid, well-known region like Egypt I'd expect some mention of these Hebrews, as well as some genetic remains.
Maybe the Exodus was a much smaller event and that it grew with the telling?If half or more of Egypt's population suddenly left, I'd expect some evidence or mention of such a momentous event.
There couldn't have been a massive Exodus.If a massive population of Hebrews dwelt for 40 years in a desert, I'd expect some archæological evidence left behind.
I'm not claiming there were no Hebrews in Egypt. It was the regional metropolis, after all. I'm claiming that there were no Egyptian texts found regarding "about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children. A mixed multitude also went up with them, and very much livestock, both flocks and herds." That would have been a good ~2M people.
Wouldn't that have been a pretty large percentage of the Egyptian population, at the time? You'd think such a momentous exodus would be mentioned somewhere besides the Torah, or would have left some archæological evidence.
What a magnificent post!You are of course free to believe what you will (and to do the research to validate those beliefs), but that is far different than pointing to the fact that a tradition is long-lived as evidence of worth.
Very long lived indeed, and no doubt reaching back to the very limits that tradition could hold on to, but I wonder how many cultures celebrate these same or similar events?Furthermore, the long-lived character of the exodus was and is in many ways the consequence of a story being successfully promoted via a vernacular alphabet and later deemed scripture. In a very real sense it is not a long-lived tradition but a long-lived text.
Exactly how many waves of migration have swept through Egypt, through both Upper, Lower and more southern nations and up in to 'Palestinian', Israeli and Syrian districts I have no idea, but I do expect that the passover/exodus story has some fact within it's depths, is all.And why "escaping of slaves on a large scale" rather than the Hyksos "expulsion," or an 'exodus' by a small group of Egyptian priests later relabelled as Levites, or ... ?
Judean and Samaritan communities....interesting that there was a division as far back as those times. I wonder how far one would need to go back to find a more united community.As for relevant evidence, the Elephantine papyri and ostraca is intriguing. Note, for example ...
The Elephantine papyri pre-date all extant manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible, and thus give scholars a very important glimpse at how Judaism was practiced in Egypt during the fifth century BCE,[10] as they seem to show evidence of the existence in c. 400 BCE of a polytheistic sect of Jews. It is widely agreed that this Elephantine community originated in the mid-seventh or mid-sixth centuries BCE, likely as a result of Judean and Samaritan refugees fleeing into Egypt during the times of Assyrian and Babylonian invasions.[11] They seem to have had no knowledge of a written Torah or the narratives described therein.[12]
The laws were constantly and continually being broken, and then returned to, and since Deuteronomy was a second review of all I wouldn't worry about clear violations. That the original Temple was itinerant then this might have caused communities who ceased travels to set up their own centres, maybe?Also important is the fact that the papyri document the existence of a small Jewish temple at Elephantine, which possessed altars for incense offerings and animal sacrifices, as late as 411 BCE. Such a temple would be in clear violation of Deuteronomic law, which stipulates that no Jewish temple may be constructed outside of Jerusalem.[10]: 31
If there was a Temple in Jerusalem at that time then the ancient history predates even those distant times?Furthermore, the papyri show that the Jews at Elephantine sent letters to the high priest in Jerusalem asking for his support in re-building their temple, which seems to suggest that the priests of the Jerusalem Temple were not enforcing Deuteronomic law at that time. Cowley notes that their petition expressed their pride at having a temple to Ya'u, ' Yahweh ' (no other god is mentioned in the petition) and gave no suggestion that their temple could be heretical.[12]
And God says he inspired the words.
This tradition was being celebrated 2000 years ago and long before, I expect that you would acknowledge that, yes?Your point was that because many believe this story then it is more likely to have occurred. Not so, just as many believe other such beliefs, and these also not having an effect on the religious belief necessarily being true. That's all. Numbers don't mean much when provenance cannot be verified.
Which they were not, but read into it what you wish.That Samaritans and Jews were celebrating Passover(exodus)
How would you know? And worse yet faith is not a pathway to the truth.A true follower lives by faith.
2Timothy 3:16Where does God say that he inspired the words?
The NT is inspired as well.No, a line in one of the (relatively late and very likely anonymous) pastorals says that ...
"All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, ..." (NRSV)
almost certainly referring to Hebrew scripture.