Marie Yavanovitch Testimony

[Prometheus85]

Hahaha....oh, wait ...you're serious...

that’s all u got?

 

[BSM1]

that’s all u got?

Actually it's all I need..

 

[sun rise]

Yeah...and?

Of course that does not matter because of who said it. His followers don't care what he says or does.

 

[BSM1]

Of course that does not matter because of who said it. His followers don't care what he says or does.

And how does that make you feel.....

 

[Revoltingest]

Another nothing burger, to quote some well known female politician...

It's always about sammiches with them, eh.

 

[Jollybear]

Um, this is a bold faced lie.

No its not a bold face lie. Its true, i proved it true. So you have a bold face denial going on. Theres no cure for zombeism.

The first time they asked her about Hunter Biden, she straight up admitted that it was brought up in an Obama prep session.

What the hell are you gibberjabering about here?

But the Republicans was talking loudly and over the witness as usual.

Oh hush! No they wer not. They asked there question and she said YES, in direct contradiction to what she said prior! The leghths you lefties go too in order to atleast say something. Youl say anything. But by doing so, you make your dwnial so obvious and that makes you look bad. If it wasnt for our debate being public, id be more pissed off. But, fill up, make yourself look bad.

I actually noticed that she mentioned it and was surprised that they didn’t poke at the issue, but they revisited it later. So no, she didn’t contradict herself or lie not even a little bit.

Yes, she lied, and im going to repost her lie below.

Also, it makes perfect sense for the Obama admin to have defenses prepared in case people try to make the Hunter Biden thing an issue.

Oh, ok, so you admit hunter, burisma was brought up to her then! Lol. Ok.....you lefties, you never clue in.

What exactly is the other option??? Please tell us, Republicans. What do you do if a President or VPs son is doing something that makes the administration look bad? Put them on a rocket to the moon? No, you create distance and you prepare your defense. And most importantly and most simply, you never do anything corrupt for that family member so it can’t be used against you. Like Biden did.

Oh my god! Lol, now your saying biden DID corruption! Wow, great admittence coming from someone who kept saying biden did nothing wrong! Lol.

Like Trump should learn to do.

Hows trump corrupt here when you just legitimized trumps call to investigate the bidens by just calling the bidens corrupt!? Lol, only lefties! I swear!

I want to say these far right blogs that u clearly get your info from are full of sh*t, but I am starting to believe you trumptards genuinely just don’t get it.

Mayby we could "get it" if youd stop PRETENDING your charge of a right wing source is full of **** merely because you call them right wing and merely because you consider truth based on your feelings. Instead address the arguments, points and documentation the right wing source points out. If you dont do that, then your not credable nor deserving of even respect.

you watch 7 bloody hours of the testimony but apparently missed the first time they asked her about hunter Biden andshe said, the first time she heard about hunter Biden was during her senate confrimation hearings.

I didnt miss that at all. In fact i quoted to you both her contradictory statements.

Also how she arrived in Ukraine in August 2016 several months before the election and several months before trump took office and the hunter Biden situation was not a main focus for what she was doing during that six month period. Yeah so much for fairness.

Ok, one more time

Yovanovitch said, "although I have met former vice president Joe Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me."

And

The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings, and this was in the form of practice questions and answers," Stefanik told the former ambassador. "This was your deposition. And you testified in this particular practice Q & A with the Obama State Department, it wasn't just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?"

Yovanovitch answered, "Yes. It is."

She LIED.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Oh i heard all 7 bloody hours of her testimony. Oh ya, i know about fairness. And i also know the TRUTH isnt NUETRAL. Trump is either guilty or he is not. Yovonavich is either useless or she is not. Its not both. So, i gave my conclusion based on verbatum quotes.

Secondly, you wanna talk fairness, why not tell that to adam shift who gave more time to the democrats then the repubs in talking to her. And he kept banging his stupid hammer down on the board for repubs, but not once for the dems.

Ya, fair alright!

Um that's because the Republicans were disruptive and kept trying to talk out of turn.
There are rules, ya know.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Yeah...and?

That's disgusting and alarming?

 

[SkepticThinker]

No its not a bold face lie. Its true, i proved it true. So you have a bold face denial going on. Theres no cure for zombeism.



What the hell are you gibberjabering about here?



Oh hush! No they wer not. They asked there question and she said YES, in direct contradiction to what she said prior! The leghths you lefties go too in order to atleast say something. Youl say anything. But by doing so, you make your dwnial so obvious and that makes you look bad. If it wasnt for our debate being public, id be more pissed off. But, fill up, make yourself look bad.



Yes, she lied, and im going to repost her lie below.



Oh, ok, so you admit hunter, burisma was brought up to her then! Lol. Ok.....you lefties, you never clue in.



Oh my god! Lol, now your saying biden DID corruption! Wow, great admittence coming from someone who kept saying biden did nothing wrong! Lol.



Hows trump corrupt here when you just legitimized trumps call to investigate the bidens by just calling the bidens corrupt!? Lol, only lefties! I swear!



Mayby we could "get it" if youd stop PRETENDING your charge of a right wing source is full of **** merely because you call them right wing and merely because you consider truth based on your feelings. Instead address the arguments, points and documentation the right wing source points out. If you dont do that, then your not credable nor deserving of even respect.



I didnt miss that at all. In fact i quoted to you both her contradictory statements.



Ok, one more time

Yovanovitch said, "although I have met former vice president Joe Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me."

And

The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings, and this was in the form of practice questions and answers," Stefanik told the former ambassador. "This was your deposition. And you testified in this particular practice Q & A with the Obama State Department, it wasn't just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?"

Yovanovitch answered, "Yes. It is."

She LIED.

As usual, you didn't prove anything.

Sounds like you need to watch those 7 hours again, as pointed out by another poster who refuted your lying claim.

 

[BSM1]

That's disgusting and alarming?

Sooo...you sayin' you get offended easily?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Sooo...you sayin' you get offended easily?

Um no.

 

[Prometheus85]

No its not a bold face lie. Its true, i proved it true. So you have a bold face denial going on. Theres no cure for zombeism.



What the hell are you gibberjabering about here?



Oh hush! No they wer not. They asked there question and she said YES, in direct contradiction to what she said prior! The leghths you lefties go too in order to atleast say something. Youl say anything. But by doing so, you make your dwnial so obvious and that makes you look bad. If it wasnt for our debate being public, id be more pissed off. But, fill up, make yourself look bad.



Yes, she lied, and im going to repost her lie below.



Oh, ok, so you admit hunter, burisma was brought up to her then! Lol. Ok.....you lefties, you never clue in.



Oh my god! Lol, now your saying biden DID corruption! Wow, great admittence coming from someone who kept saying biden did nothing wrong! Lol.



Hows trump corrupt here when you just legitimized trumps call to investigate the bidens by just calling the bidens corrupt!? Lol, only lefties! I swear!



Mayby we could "get it" if youd stop PRETENDING your charge of a right wing source is full of **** merely because you call them right wing and merely because you consider truth based on your feelings. Instead address the arguments, points and documentation the right wing source points out. If you dont do that, then your not credable nor deserving of even respect.



I didnt miss that at all. In fact i quoted to you both her contradictory statements.



Ok, one more time

Yovanovitch said, "although I have met former vice president Joe Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me."

And

The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings, and this was in the form of practice questions and answers," Stefanik told the former ambassador. "This was your deposition. And you testified in this particular practice Q & A with the Obama State Department, it wasn't just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?"

Yovanovitch answered, "Yes. It is."

She LIED.

someone is either being extremely dishonest or just flat out lying. I’d say both.

 

[Prometheus85]

As usual, you didn't prove anything.

Sounds like you need to watch those 7 hours again, as pointed out by another poster who refuted your lying claim.

Exactly. All he did was copy and paste some BS from some right wing blog. I don’t understand how someone says they watched 7hrs of testimony and say she lied by using to statements that don’t coincide with eachother. One statement was apart of her opening testimony and the other was an answer to a question the republicans bought up several times which was, how she first heard about joe Biden and the company in her briefings before her senate confrimation heelarings. Which means she had no idea about it perviously.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Exactly. All he did was copy and paste some BS from some right wing blog. I don’t understand how someone says they watched 7hrs of testimony and say she lied by using to statements that don’t coincide with eachother. One statement was apart of her opening testimony and the other was an answer to a question the republicans bought up several times which was, how she first heard about joe Biden and the company in her briefings before her senate confrimation heelarings. Which means she had no idea about it perviously.

I know, I don't get it.

I watched the entire thing and concur with your description of how it went down.

 

[Riders]

There was also another person who testified friday or whenever she did but it was not in open court. They said he had direct evidence, he over heard the conversation with Trump on the phone.I wonder where Republicans are getting the misinformation that people testifying do not have direct evidence.?

 

[BSM1]

There was also another person who testified friday or whenever she did but it was not in open court. They said he had direct evidence, he over heard the conversation with Trump on the phone.I wonder where Republicans are getting the misinformation that people testifying do not have direct evidence.?

Who are you talking about?

 

[metis]

What’s everyone’s takeaway form her testimony?

Extremely interesting, imo, and very damning of Trump's and his defender's actions. We well know what Trump was trying to do and why, so her testimony only adds more fuel to the fire.

What was truly funny is that the next morning I watched Fox & Friends for a bit, and they were falling all over themselves trying to distort & twist things to defend Trump and make the Dem congresspeople bad. And then one of the newswomen referred to "we conservatives...", which just goes to show how "objective" they are.

 

[Riders]

Who are you talking about?

David Holmes
Witness overheard US ambassador tell Trump that Ukraine would investigate Biden - CNNPolitics

 

[Jollybear]

Um that's because the Republicans were disruptive and kept trying to talk out of turn.
There are rules, ya know.

No they wernt disruptive lier! Thats a flagrant lie!

As usual, you didn't prove anything.

Sounds like you need to watch those 7 hours again, as pointed out by another poster who refuted your lying claim.

Actually, my last post to him refuted HIM. Its not the other way around.

But hey, i saw you both talking about my post to eachother. Fill up, keep reinforcing eachother into your BS.

 

[Prometheus85]

No they wernt disruptive lier! Thats a flagrant lie!



Actually, my last post to him refuted HIM. Its not the other way around.

But hey, i saw you both talking about my post to eachother. Fill up, keep reinforcing eachother into your BS.

No it didn’t. You just copied and pasted some right wing nonsense. Which I find odd. Because you allegedly watched the whole 7hours of her testimony and yet came to the conclusion that she lied based on two statements that were taken outta context but right wing media.

In any case here’s a clip of her being asked about her Being briefed on hunter Biden prior to her senate confrimation hearings.