These claims of a free people needing guns because it's so bad when the government just has them doesn't pan out in real life.
And it's not just a short period in history. Dictatorships and authoritarians have existed throughout history despite an armed populace. Free societies exist despite strict gun laws.
but it does “pan out in real life.” I have given you evidence of exactly that. Sure there are places where there are strict gun laws and the impact those gun laws have had is debatable, but that isn’t the point. The point here is that there are also governments which have enacted strict gun laws and then gone on to commit atrocities against the people.
Austrailia has a representative democracy and the people have some degree of control in pushing back politically against oppression or corruption. Hopefully, Australia will remain a representative democracy and this will never be an issue for them. But can we say that it will? I am not so sure. We can say that the evidence indicates that totalitarian regimes have killed more than any gun control measures can ever hope to save. We can also note that societies with an armed populace have a greater measure of defense than populaces without arms.
Guns are efficient and effective measures of self defense. If you don’t want to own one, that is great don’t own one. But do you really think you have the right to make that decision for your neighbor? This smacks of the same entitlement that one has when one thinks they have the right to make medical decisions for their neighbors. What I always find interesting, however is the people that hold such views. They may talk about “pigs” and how evil the government is, but then they will say sure the government should totally have weapons while the people have none.