Since the "accident" we've had floor level PIR lighting fitted, we have 2 cats and i don't think i can invent another spoonerism on the spur of the moment.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mathematical proof of the omniscient Champion. Can we call Him "God"?
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
-
- Tags
- god god exists omniscience
Since the "accident" we've had floor level PIR lighting fitted, we have 2 cats and i don't think i can invent another spoonerism on the spur of the moment.
DavidFirth
Well-Known Member
I'm considering installing some floor lighting. That's probably a good move.
DavidFirth
Well-Known Member
Yep. And one usually is.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
We use LED nightlights that automatically go on at night, largely because at my wife's and my age as tripping can be a death sentence.
The paradox for the OP is: Evolution
In theorie it's possible to 'know' everything about what IS NOW but that doesn't mean that what IS NOW will still be the same 100 million years from now.
......and....no,.. even if you gonna call it 'the buildingblocks', 'mini-mini atoms', 'black holes', etc., even those are probably 'effected' by evolution... well, ok, we can't say that for sure yet.... maybe ask Google in 100 mln years?..
In theorie it's possible to 'know' everything about what IS NOW but that doesn't mean that what IS NOW will still be the same 100 million years from now.
......and....no,.. even if you gonna call it 'the buildingblocks', 'mini-mini atoms', 'black holes', etc., even those are probably 'effected' by evolution... well, ok, we can't say that for sure yet.... maybe ask Google in 100 mln years?..
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
1) mental characters are real structures in brain, the proof so starts.
2) So, you would like to remove word "God" and use the "Homer Simpson" or "Unicorn" instead. You have fallen into the "name-calling fallacy".
No. Is shown, that because HC exists in mind, then HC exists in outside world and in mind.
In Special Relativity of Established Science the notion "now" is relative. It does not hold in all descriptions of Reality. My proof is description-independent.The paradox for the OP is: Evolution
In theorie it's possible to 'know' everything about what IS NOW but that doesn't mean that what IS NOW will still be the same 100 million years from now.
......and....no,.. even if you gonna call it 'the buildingblocks', 'mini-mini atoms', 'black holes', etc., even those are probably 'effected' by evolution... well, ok, we can't say that for sure yet.... maybe ask Google in 100 mln years?..
leibowde84
Veteran Member
You obviously have an incorrect understanding of ad hominem (or the "name-calling fallacy"). That speaks to when one sinks to personal insults, name-calling in an argument. I have not done that. I simply showed you that there is no connection with being able to imagine things in your mind with them existing outside the mind in reality.