I wandered onto a video 'related' to the one Mazdaian put up earlier (thank you, Mazdaian!) which argues that Ahura Mazda and Yahweh are actually the same god - using references from the Bible and historical texts as an explanation.
Does this argument have any weight? What do you think?
The word is 'Mazdayasneen' (those who follow the religion of Ahur Mazda as enunciated by Zoroaster, Zarathushtra).
Yes, Ahur Mazda is of the same category of Gods as Aten, YHWH, the Christian God or Allah. But these Gods sent different messengers to the world.
People use different scales, so the weight of the argument will depend on who is weighing it. I am a strong atheist, therefore, the weight of the argument is exactly zero or less (negative) for me.
Maybe the historical roots are from 'belief in One God', but any more recent depictions bear no resemblance whatsoever.
'Belief in God' is SECONDARY to the belief in messenger, Zoroaster, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, Joseph Smith, Bahaollah, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, etc.
Wow, St Augustine paints with a broad brush! Sikhi doesn't have roots in Abrahamic religion, so I'm not sure how he concludes they are 'worshipping the same God'.
Greetings, Treks. Sikhi (Sikhism) is monist as far as I know.